baco wf3?

[cougarz]

proe wf3 m180, support different features on a sketch, modify the odds of the sketch, regenero and features do not follow the modified sketch. also entering the incriminated features, do not update. need to delete references and recheck them. Is that a kiss?

 

[maxopus]

I don't think it's a kiss.
if you can post the zipper part, so let's check what it is.

 

[cougarz]

here is the zipped file

 

[Prof.]

before saying that it is a kiss check it carefully.
Thank you.

 

[zimmy]

if skecth is the one used to "bucare" (treated of holes and not of holes ) the piece,
I tried to change some quotas (from 10 to 9.5 and diam from 5.2 to 4.5 ) , regenerates -> all ok! with wf3 m230. I can't tell you

 

[maxopus]

provato con wf3 m160, nessun problema.
che workstation hai (scheda video, ram e sistema operativo) ?

 

[cougarz]

The computer is a toilet, but I don't think it can count the computer I have. have you tried to change the odds of the holes and to regenerate and everything has followed the change?

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

The problem is very simple you have it in front of your eyes, it is not a kiss, the computer may be also a toilet but not even the one centered.. .

 

[maxopus]

I think it's a hierarchy problem in the model tree.

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

no it is conceptually wrong to take the sketch references in that way, especially when there are mirrors in the middle, which are very labile.

if all the model is based on a sketch feature of 4 circles, all dependent references must be taken with a certain criterion.

I already see that in the first ribassi of the studs (feature nr.12) were taken the 2 means arcs of sketch, at the top left and at the top right to determine the position and its diameter and subsequently were mirrored.

This already creates problems, but the most serious thing is the next.

the feature nr.14, you have always taken the 4 curve references, at least at that point you take the copy edge with the loop if you just want to do something like that, but do not take the reference bind it and give again the 4 equal rays, making in this way you create inetivably a cascade of dependencies very dirty and difficult manageable in regeneration.

but use some reference type axis or point not?

greetings