• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

bad relationship with solidworks

  • Thread starter Thread starter uluwatu_74
  • Start date Start date

uluwatu_74

Guest
greetings,
from a few months I started working for a company that uses solidworks 2014 for automatic machines.
the relationship is not quite happy!
I find that in the modeling it is very nice... but in the management of assemblies and in various other things...it is really hallucinating what it does!
jump assiemi every escalation of office temperature, need to regenerate continuously because the views show what the most aggradas, features that do not want to feel of appearing once done...poi by magic come out always regenerating, mode of the uterus that works in a wild way too...and so on...to a nervous exhaustion that I now consider inevitable! ! ! !
the question is: but these strangeness only makes them to me (i.e. software is set in a strange way or anything related to various settings)... or are common...and who uses solidworks for years has taken drugs and now works happy? often I am forced to call colleagues to ask "sorry...I am mad I... or did this absurd thing really do it?"!!!! Until today they told me that it is solidworks suffering from melancholy! ! !
thanks for any answers!
greetings
 
but these strange things do me only
Click to expand...
Perhaps if you were more precise you could give an answer, because
jumper assiemi[...]The visualizations show what they hold[...]eatures that don't want to hear about it when made[...]mode of the grapes, explained in guide However, that works so wildly
Click to expand...
do not mean and explain at all what happens
since 2003 that I use solidworks, it is true that I have not used other 3ds and I have no comparisons, but what I had to do I always managed to do
 
I didn't have such problems even using solid to a course on a pc without dedicated video cheda. if the pc you use nn is obsolete try to install solid again and check the video drivers. if this nn resolves contact support and check program settings.
 
your responses upset me on one side...but maybe it's better like this: there's a chance to improve the situation!!! I will make an in-depth study of the situation video card, which in fact... I imagined it was certainly up to a cad 3d in God's grace.
 
I hook up to this thread to ask for lumens. .
at work I have a precision t5810, a monster from 15000 euros. .
compared to my colleagues who have computers much more scraut, when I start working on assemblies, slows down and nails that is a pleasure. .
video card is a k6000 picture nvidia, say that it could be a driver problem?
 
I say it doesn't seem so weird.
I worked in two companies with different solidworks versions (before 2009-2010 and 2016).
These things even did to me, maybe not so much, but sometimes the management of the assemblies was complicated.

attention to how you impose the various constraints: Unfortunately I have noticed that the software sometimes with axiemi a little complex (I therefore understand not 2 or 3 parts) begins to have difficulty managing the assemblies.
sometimes "low" recheck the design tree where you see the components and constraints and move them higher or lower. tries to have a set where constraints are a logical consequence of how you insert the parts.
Sometimes I solved it with this system.

It remains the fact that even me from problems despite the machine is preeminent and with proper video card (k620) envy and updated drivers.

to make an example: today I reopened a set with two configurations where there is a configuration with "closed cover" and the other called "open cover". as you can guess I created the two configurations to have two positions of a distinct component and then verify the encumbrances. some constraints related to the vice practically continue to get high after the saves (then I create them correct, I verify that they work but at the reopening of the file everything returns in disorder).

so I understand you and you have my solidarity, but try to check once more how you create your constraints.
 
for example:
I have to do a section. ..select a plan and then with the arrow cursor start moving dynamically.
Well... today I have come to 12 section attempts (just clearly nerve crisis...psychoanalyst and so on!!!!) and this software did not want to know to make me this "santa" section!!! because it is very susceptible and tells me that the section generates invalid bodies and therefore I must reposition it.
I start moving it in a millimeter... but nothing!!! ! ! ! ! !
Is this the car I use?
 
Usually that notice appears to me, not always though, on parts imported from step. parts however not trivial; for example cylinders, motors.
here the tricks to solve the problem, which I have never understood from what depends, vary according to the situation. one for example is to make a shortcut section or putting legacy an almost null staggering .I attach image of clarification (the size 100 is to make clear the type of section, but on the field it has to put a value 0.001 or similar; then the quota goes hidden). if it is applicable depends on what section and for what purpose.
or do a decomposed section
or once you understand what particular problem to exclude it from the sectionImmagine.webp
 
Massive excuse. I have not specified that I was talking about modalita 3d and not of the masses in the table
 
Then in that case you have no escape.
You still have to figure out which part of the problem. and then see what you can do.
please correct that profile facebook is not software
 
Thank you for making me feel sick! I came to try 25 and I was so sorry!
facebook is not a software... you are right! ;)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)
Back
Top