balance of a mechanism (motion)

[fede27]

Bye to all,

I am using motion to analyze a cinematism to a degree of freedom, it is a pneumatic clamp that serves to tighten objects.

My aim is to achieve static (force) and cinematic analysis of cinematism. I have a known force that is applied to the stem. if you apply a force to motive how do I get the balance on the yielder? Maybe brushing the whole set of configurations I need for operation. I mean to automate the classic manual static analysis (and then kinematic) that you could do for a well-defined configuration, of course thanks to the software you can solve the balances in multiple configurations in a short time.

so far I have not succeeded in my intent, if I apply a linear motor on the stem I impose a law of motion, but the forces that I detect are dependent on the masses and the inertias of the members, if I apply the necessary force he does not obtain the balance on the yielder as I would like.

Thank you for your help!
Faithful

 

[meccanicamg]

Bye to all,

I am using motion to analyze a cinematism to a degree of freedom, it is a pneumatic clamp that serves to tighten objects.

My aim is to achieve static (force) and cinematic analysis of cinematism. I have a known force that is applied to the stem. if you apply a force to motive how do I get the balance on the yielder? Maybe brushing the whole set of configurations I need for operation. I mean to automate the classic manual static analysis (and then kinematic) that you could do for a well-defined configuration, of course thanks to the software you can solve the balances in multiple configurations in a short time.

so far I have not succeeded in my intent, if I apply a linear motor on the stem I impose a law of motion, but the forces that I detect are dependent on the masses and the inertias of the members, if I apply the necessary force he does not obtain the balance on the yielder as I would like.

Thank you for your help!
Faithful

post a pattern or even better the 3d model we see to understand what you are talking about. only in words you do not understand things and where you applied and why.
if you have the complete motion module you also have inertia, gravity, all considerable and taxable. meanwhile, look at the swx and networked tutorials (films).

then we gladly discuss it. :smile:

 

[fede27]

thanks to the answer, in fact it is difficult to understand only in words. I attach an image of the scheme with some comments, I hope that now the problem is clear.

Hello and thank you!