ball the drawing quotas automatically

[AK-47]

Good morning.

I wanted to know if there is a way to ball, to write the quotas on the drawing automatically.

this because sending the design to the supplier, it is easier then to discuss any changes/controls on certain quotas.

what I'm interested in is being able to bring a reference to the value of the quota.

I can switch between the name of the quota (d101 for example) and its value, but it's not what I care about. I look for an automatic method of identifying a share uniquely in addition to its intrinsic value.

Has anyone had the opportunity to face and solve this aspect?

Thank you.

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

Good morning doctor! :wink:

then an automatic way to post all the quotas in a drawing I already tell you that it does not exist but depending on your final purpose there may be valid alternatives.

we say that in principle what you want to do is a method typically used for the inspection of the piece at the quality level, jointly called fai (first article inspection), the technical quality takes the design, ball manually or digital all the design and attaches with a report (typically a excel) all the numbered quotas, with the separate tolerance values, the control method with which the mandatory value is controlled (caliber, perccmeter,luto. . .

if in your company (and I presume so) do this type of control then there are applications developed in toolkit that allow you to do it clearly always maintaining the association with design, prices, tolerances, as well as there are software that do that job starting from a pdf, but here clearly it is not associative.


If your final purpose instead is only to view together with the supplier the quotas then I could propose you another system, which instead of numbering and posting the quotas previews the use of the x-y coordinates exploiting the drawing cartilage divided into sectors letters and numbers, style naval battle in automatic of course.

in my opinion if your purpose is only this is more than enough, otherwise if you need the above part you should use the other, because it would incorporate more parts of the manufacturing process, with a remarkable return in time.

If we have time for a second Tuesday, I can show you. :wink:

greetings

 

[AK-47]

Good morning to her entrepreneur (now you have left your desk completely I imagine...) :finger:

I was interested in knowing if there was something in proe; but from how you tell me those toolkits are not integrated into the software. I would be curious cmq of verne one or more at work. If you have useful links, I'm starting to give him a Okkiata.

And then, you who are now in the high spheres of the ptc, could propose an improvement of this type! for a future creo 2.0!

thanks in the meantime and good work

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

Good morning to her entrepreneur (now you have left your desk completely I imagine...) :finger:

Let's say I'm less and less in the office. I still wait for the ficus plant, the human leather armchair and the ninfo-secretary 20 years... :wink:

I was interested in knowing if there was something in proe; but from how you tell me those toolkits are not integrated into the software. I would be curious cmq of verne one or more at work. If you have useful links, I'm starting to give him a Okkiata.

toolkit is the programming and customization environment of applications in pro/e.
I don't have links to send you, they're jobs for customers, just for special needs like these.

And then, you who are now in the high spheres of the ptc, could propose an improvement of this type! for a future creo 2.0!

But I doubt they'll listen to me. . .
ps: but the naval battle hypothesis does not garb you? is the customer unable to recover the odds if he does not have a reference ball? :wink:

thanks in the meantime and good work

 

[arni1]

On-inspectionwww.sf.comhttp://www.sf.com/index.php/cad-cam-en/pe-inspect-en.htmlcation
Arni