beast slowdown

[marcazzanluca]

Good morning to all
I am faced with a very complex problem.
we're working on a nice tough project and we have a nice tough problem, now I explain.
the axieme is composed of many parts of interwoven sheet with structural members and every time I enter in one part and do unmodified then in returning to the axieme puts an eternity to make the update of the part, with loss of time at the end of the considerable day.
So I ask someone if there is a chance to speed up these automatic processes that makes solidworks when you step on one side to the axieme.
These time losses multiplied by three people we are working on the project and multiplied by 8 hours a day at weekends we talk about hours lost uselessly.
Thank you.

luca marker

 

[marcof]

Good morning to all
I am faced with a very complex problem.
we're working on a nice tough project and we have a nice tough problem, now I explain.
the axieme is composed of many parts of interwoven sheet with structural members and every time I enter in one part and do unmodified then in returning to the axieme puts an eternity to make the update of the part, with loss of time at the end of the considerable day.
So I ask someone if there is a chance to speed up these automatic processes that makes solidworks when you step on one side to the axieme.
These time losses multiplied by three people we are working on the project and multiplied by 8 hours a day at weekends we talk about hours lost uselessly.
Thank you.
luca marker

did not give any useful indication to understand the causes of slowing down, a bit like calling the mechanic and saying "the car consumes a lot and goes slow, how can I fix it? " :wink:

To say a lot together means little. there are assemblies that become unmanageable because they are made in a non-optimal way even if they are made by a few hundred parts, and others that are made as a rule of art but that become toast because they are constituted by tens of thousands of components.
is it a mostly top-down set?
there are a thousand thousand thousand indications that you have to provide so that someone can tell you something more than "cambia pc"...

 

[re_solidworks]

Good morning to all
I am faced with a very complex problem.
we're working on a nice tough project and we have a nice tough problem, now I explain.
the axieme is composed of many parts of interwoven sheet with structural members and every time I enter in one part and do unmodified then in returning to the axieme puts an eternity to make the update of the part, with loss of time at the end of the considerable day.
So I ask someone if there is a chance to speed up these automatic processes that makes solidworks when you step on one side to the axieme.
These time losses multiplied by three people we are working on the project and multiplied by 8 hours a day at weekends we talk about hours lost uselessly.
Thank you.

luca marker

the information you have given is actually too little to understand what the problem is. first give us information about the pcs you use?
I also thought about the modeling technique. For example, I have seen that the multibody should not be used excessively, that is, in addition to a certain threshold of components it becomes more difficult to manage a traditional set.
I have not yet identified the maximum number of convenient bodies, but I made tables of a multibody model of others, excessively and unnecessarily complex, and times were indecent.
if you have a unique salad with huge dimensions (e.g. 2000 components) it is best to make a set of 10 parts welded by 200 components or, if it is not possible, model it with a traditional asm.
other button the simplification of the models. if it is not necessary to maintain all the details of a set in the upper axieme would be the case of clearing it. the defeaturing of swx is not enough to achieve this purpose, I use the configurations to simplify and sometimes remodel in one part the envelope of the axieme and can do it in a parametric way since I support myself on the same skeleton.
In short, there are loopholes, you have to understand what could be feasible in your reality.
the quickest way of resolution is to report it to the var point, he what did he tell you?

 

[marcazzanluca]

Good morning
Sorry for the delay in the answer but I was a little bit hurt this last week.
we start from pc specifications, almost all are equipped with i5 dual core processor at 2.7 ghz 12 ram giga and 580 512 mb ram picture video card.
we always work on the net, with category 6 network just remade new, server with windows server 2008 new ball.
Our assemblies consist of about 1000/1500 components.
normally we do mini assemblies and then we gather everything together.
Our parts are mostly multi-corps, sometimes complex ache, with many bodies and sheets inside them (I ask sheet metal processing if then not used development can be replaced by simple extrusions? ).
Some parts also took 10 minutes in the rescue, then with newmacut we saw to solve this problem that was caused by dbcent.
another question, dbcent how do you consider it? Are there any other programs that I replace him better? I found this here and I had no choice.
in a body is it better to avoid complex processes? (guided series etc.).
Last thing, with some more powerful pcs, would we solve a problem? here now we don't even have a workstation are all simple pcs.
do you have a configuration like a pc with balls?
I don't know if I've been clear enough.

Good day

Luca m.