• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

better autocad to 32 or 64 bits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pc3103
  • Start date Start date

pc3103

Guest
Bye to all,
as from title is better autocad to 32 or 64 bit? because I heard around that if you do not have to create big projects it is useless to have 64 bit.
Thank you very much
 
the 32-bit set it on a 32-bit system, a 64-bit set it in a 64-bit system.
I think if you're trying to install a 32 on a 64 system, it doesn't allow you.
instead if you try to install a 64 on 32 system, simply it is not possible.
 
because I heard around that if you do not have to create big projects it is useless to have 64 bit.
Did your cousin say that? put it this way...if you have to go by car to do the shopping in the shopping center of your city you can go with an old pandino, but maybe it is faster and more comfortable to go with the suv
 
It is a matter of s.o.
If you have a s.o. 32 bits go 32, if the s.o. is 64, go 64...
it is not panda or jaguar (performances/comodity) but of environment.
difficult to circulate a suv on the tracks, so it is difficult to circulate a train on the highway, regardless of the performance.
 
Okay, thank you very much. But I want to make an example: microsoft office exists both at 32 and 64 bits, but the microsoft stesa recommends 32 bits even on 64 bit systems. therefore practically microsoft prefers to make everyone go on the pandino, even on the highway:biggrin::biggrin:
 
Okay, thank you very much. But I want to make an example: microsoft office exists both at 32 and 64 bits, but the microsoft stesa recommends 32 bits even on 64 bit systems. therefore practically microsoft prefers to make everyone go on the pandino, even on the highway:biggrin::biggrin:
in the case of office the recommendation was made for a compatibility problem of add-ons (free, macro, active x) not compatible with the 64-bit version. this at least until the 2013 version of office, then I don't know if microsoft changed address.
 
the 32-bit set it on a 32-bit system, a 64-bit set it in a 64-bit system.
I think if you're trying to install a 32 on a 64 system, it doesn't allow you.
instead if you try to install a 64 on 32 system, simply it is not possible.
absolutely no
on a 64 bit you can install a 32 bit,certain times is easy sometimes it is difficult
last example that happened to me, I installed rhino 5 and rhino 6
rhino 6 is only 64 bit but rhino 5 is 32 and 64 and on the computer installed me both v 32 and 64,
but it is not the only ,in fact windows previews a folder called " x86 programs" where it installs 32 bits on os 64 bit
allego imm my pcpcImmagine.webp
 
Bye to all,
as from title is better autocad to 32 or 64 bit? because I heard around that if you do not have to create big projects it is useless to have 64 bit.
Thank you very much
there are some additional plugins or applications that are sometimes somewhat outdated and only available at 32 bits. If you have to use it then you probably should use a 32-bit cad, otherwise there's no reason to do it. I speak in general, not knowing autocad.
 
absolutely no
on a 64 bit you can install a 32 bit,certain times is easy sometimes it is difficult
normally it is so but autocad this does not allow it, unless you install an old release that existed only in x86 version
I wasn't generically talking about installing a 32bit on a 64 bit. in general certain that it is possible (some programs do not exist just to 64 bit), windows has folders appropriate for this (programx86, system32 etc), and allows it quietly.
but autocad doesn't talk about it. at the time of installation the setup makes a verification on s.o. current and if the version is not that of the installation package, it alerts you and exits from the installation.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top