"big" axiemi... how do you manage them?

[stef_design]

Hey, guys.
what is the maximum number of components you manage in product environment? obviously with a smooth display.

 

[stef_design]

and also how to manage them (trucks, hardware implementations, ...).
bye:

 

[torniaccio]

Hello, stef! Every now and then we read again! Always on the breach, huh?
and anyway, I found indispensable a good hardware base, especially for the graphics card, then work module for module projects and then convey them in a single mega final together maybe to save in cgr for future quick views.

Bye!

 

[stef_design]

Hello, stef! Every now and then we read again! Always on the breach, huh?
and anyway, I found indispensable a good hardware base, especially for the graphics card, then work module for module projects and then convey them in a single mega final together maybe to save in cgr for future quick views.

Bye!

hi lathe mesh, as a hardware base what you mean (butta down a little numbers):wink:?
the final file "mega" is about how many components?

 

[The_Matrix]

hi lathe mesh, as a hardware base what you mean (butta down a little numbers):wink:?
the final file "mega" is about how many components?

on a different product (nx) I noticed that the current hw level is + that sufficient to manage really large assemblies.
what I think (infrastructure) should be taken care of is:(1) Network. must be fast and without bottlenecks2) data quality. must be of good quality... I noticed that only 1 component with geometric problems and the performance collapses (at least, on nx).3) hw locale. w7 64 bit, 8gb ram, nvidia with 1gb on board are usually + that sufficient on high end cad

 

[alebacc]

the most important thing is to have win64 bits and 8 giga ram.

then use chace for cgr representations.

 

[The_Matrix]

the most important thing is to have win64 bits and 8 giga ram.

then use chace for cgr representations.

This is true if you work alone with data on your disk.
(which is highly unlikely, isn't it? )
if you are a "normal" user and on a complex artifact you work there in 20, with the data on the net (pdm or not), the network becomes your bottleneck.
And you know why?
... because a workstation with a good cpu, 8gb ram and a good nvidia costs 1500€, while a network with excellent performance (physical... switch... router... server... etc) costs no more, where n goes from (20 to 100).

 

[stef_design]

then use chace for cgr representations.

You mean, saving the various components in cgr or opening the axieme with the cache?

 

[stef_design]

a network with excellent performance (physical... switch... router... server... etc) costs no more, where n goes from (20 to 100).

the user, inserted in a business context, can you see or know if the " bottleneck" is the network? or better, can you measure network performance?

 

[peloritano]

in my company a colleague has catsetting defined light.....I do not know exactly the origin (perhaps the assistance) but seem to work egregiously.
I'll train them.

 

[The_Matrix]

the user, inserted in a business context, can you see or know if the " bottleneck" is the network? or better, can you measure network performance?

can have a sense.
definitely the evaluation is heuristic.
It's what you need to do that measurement.

 

[stef_design]

can have a sense.
definitely the evaluation is heuristic.
It's what you need to do that measurement.

but the trick, I cover everything locally and then I port (to work/revision finished) to the server, can it work?
often you have very good ws but unfortunately networks or slow servers. Unfortunately the blame always falls to the designer who must respect times and methods not always in line with the technologies made available.
How can you do that?
Is there any possibility, design method or philosophy to adopt to improve speed and therefore also the quality of work?
thanks ug:smile::smile:

 

[falonef]

from us the files are copied from the local server -> edited -> to final changes -> all saved again on the server.

cache mode: Yes but only if you don't have to create detailed assembly drawings (sections, esatee odds etc.) because in that case cv5 has to fully calculate everything again

hardware: 64bit + at least 4 gb ram, better 8 ..

 

[stef_design]

from us the files are copied from the local server -> edited -> to final changes -> all saved again on the server.

This operation is done by the designer with a classic copy+paste or via utility or pdm?

 

[falonef]

of course through our plm.

ps: sorry the "naturally"

 

[stef_design]

I'm so glad. linkoptimise catia settings for large assemblies