big problem with the withdrawal

[giocamb]

hello to all
I write to you because I have a huge problem in entering the retreat,
I have a math coming from catia in step format, once imported the file is solid though if I insert the withdrawal that on the three axes is different you dismantle the file...and this is a huge problem.what has a solution?
attached I put the pictures before and after.

I forgot if the withdrawal is only one file does not go down so the problem is due to the different withdrawal on the three axes
withdrawal
x 0.5%
axis y 1.05%
z 1.05%

 

[maxopus]

use the mold module because from what I remember on the foundation the withdrawal cannot be differentiated on the 3 axes.
also indicate that version of pro/e uses.
If you can finally post the step, maybe someone can try to cuff us.

 

[giocamb]

the version and wildfire 5 you have the module for molds but sti pieces do not open even if you cry in Japanese and Chinese together.
the withdrawal is set for scaling and uncheck isotropic to enable the 3 boxes of the withdrawal on the 3 axes.

I managed to find the surfaces that were shooting, all small turning surfaces.....I wonder how to work so

files all rattoppati.

 

[maxopus]

the version and wildfire 5 you have the module for molds but sti pieces do not open even if you cry in Japanese and Chinese together.
the withdrawal is set for scaling and uncheck isotropic to enable the 3 boxes of the withdrawal on the 3 axes.

I managed to find the surfaces that were shooting, all small turning surfaces.....I wonder how to work so

files all rattoppati.

This is the fantastic world of design.
want people to 20 euros per hour to do things? here's the result.
Then there's a cat... I don't know why, but when I get there, you work with a casket, I get a toast along my back and half the time it's about overlapping surfaces, shot, disconnected or exploded.
if you ask to send you something done better: "Oh I don't know who did it, the file came to me like this."

 

[zimmy]

In general, catia does not produce very beautiful files, although in recent years things have improved.
even if you do not solve the problem, I ask you, by curiosity, to read the accuracy with which the file was generated.
in this case as it is step, try opening the file with a editor (wordpad) and look for string uncertainty_measure_with_unit. below you should find value precision accuracy.
This can be important in order to adequately correct accuracy for reading in proes.

or, in case the value is very low, you could call who generated the file to ask for a correction (if ever it was able to do so) to have more human values and that do not lead to aberrations like what happened to you.
In case you have someone who gives you solidworks files... it would be funny!
Hi.

 

[arni1]

a test you can do with:

intf_in_external_accuracy yes

so proe searches for the right accuracy alone when you open the step file.



Hi.
hinges

 

[The_Matrix]

This is the fantastic world of design.
want people to 20 euros per hour to do things? here's the result.
Then there's a cat... I don't know why, but when I get there, you work with a casket, I get a toast along my back and half the time it's about overlapping surfaces, shot, disconnected or exploded.if you ask to send you something done better: "Oh I don't know who did it, the file came to me like this."

Oh, you say that...
without seeing the step file, however, you can not do much.

 

[cacciatorino]

Then there's a cat... I don't know why, but when I get there, you work with a casket, I get a toast along my back and half the time it's about overlapping surfaces, shot, disconnected or exploded.

I confirm, even when I have to deal with iges or steps from caia I already know that I have to prepare for the worst.