black edges forever

[cacciatorino]

noooo! but then you can see. . that you have told us all these years?
a myth has collapsed

..but maybe it will only be for the tetesca version (austriaca?), hopefully

greetings
Mar

now they will all become partisans of the black edges, like those of the macintosh after the passage from the g4 processors to the intel!

 

[maxopus]

I don't think they can improve my job. I leave these things to "femminucce"

 

[Er Presidente]

noooo! but then you can see. . that you have told us all these years?
a myth has collapsed

..but maybe it will only be for the tetesca version (austriaca?), we hope:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

There's no religion, we lost honor, we don't have the horizon anymore, the world is lost in the sidereal space, and we are condemned!

 

[marcof]

There's no religion, we lost honor, we don't have the horizon anymore, the world is lost in the sidereal space, and we are condemned!

"Yes, yes, no, I do.. " [cit. Troisi] :biggrin:

 

[elleon]

I intervene because I am one of the "femminucce" who had already asked this question.. .
... I would like to find myself well with pros and I find it better than the other modelers I tried.

I keep reading that s edgings are not needed and every time I get a comparison: I buy a ferrari but they give it to me without air conditioning. What am I doing? It takes power... I can always lower the windows... then in the tail under the sun I see the one near in the panda in the fresh:biggrin:

the doubt that maybe, in some cases, I would have served maybe it comes to me. . .

 

[maxopus]

I gladly leave this question , comparing everything to an air conditioner seems excessive.
a consideration however is necessary:
I used the systems with and without edges and, in the passage to the system without edges, I have not suffered neither trauma (I have of other kind) nor slowing down in the work.

the illutrate method above (view the edges) exists at least from the wf3 and is not a novelty of the wf5.
I noticed at the same time one thing, that the systems with the edges are much slower than the systems without, perhaps that's why the ptc tend not to use them.
I tried to load very complex assemblies with one and another system and said right out of the teeth ... there is no bit, you can do all the goats you want pro/e in the management of big assemblies is the best cad that exists on the face of the earth.
we also have a swx license and right these days we are working on a complex machine set and we have to make 300 explosion tables on a customer's project.
boys come milk to the knees, every time we open the assemblies (loaded in light weight) and we have to configure an explosive view we do first to give two hammered on the zebedei and the machine is a hp z600 with nvidia picture fx 4800 and 12 gb ram.
with pros a year ago we worked on a more complex project of this, with 2gb ram machines and 3500 fx card and worked much better.
I don't know if this is the fault of the black edges, but I prefer to have a cad that turns as you must.

 

[cacciatorino]

I don't know if this is the fault of the black edges, but I prefer to have a cad that turns as you must.

the important thing is that the cad allows the user to choose what he prefers.... good thing that also pro/e allows the option.

 

[incapace]

config.pro:
show_shaded_edges yes

e poi come nel gif allegato.



arni

Thank you! ! ! ! ! ! ! !if I saw it look! ! ! ! !!!

ho seen the look! ! ! ! ! ! !!!
used to ug were years I wanted them!!!! ptc did the miracle!! ! !I think that the swx crisis is not attributable to the black edges... but to the modeling engine... since I worked with caia and ug on huge assemblies with 3gb machines and fx1400 ... and they went discreetly ....

the fact is that catia ug pro/e are high-end robine born on the automotive
and the aerospace ... the rest is robe that has evolved discreetly well ....

 

[maxopus]

I think with this puxxanata... ptc will have some extra clients

 

[cletus]

show_shaded_edges yes

It is a parameter that has always been in proe, it allows to highlight the edges.
the left image is of the now defunct version 2001, the right one with wf2.

 

[maxopus]

It is a parameter that has always been in proe, it allows to highlight the edges.
the left image is of the now defunct version 2001, the right one with wf2.

hello cletus, so I remembered well, it is not a novelty.
But if you want them like the others... horse bell:biggrin::biggrin:

 

[sampom]

Now I'm offended, you've made fun of us! No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. The ns is a serious cad, not cartoons. and now it turns out that you always had them but kept them well hidden, so much to make fighetti, the "alternatives".
:hahahahah::hahahahah:

But if you want them like the others...

Other jokes,
Why are they "the others"? What do you mean? even in swx choose whether to display them or not, and I confirm that for heavy stuff I have to remove them because they nail everything (but then you get used to it and I almost never use them.. ah, and the quality/definition of the monitor is important for understanding the graphics area).
Indeed, yours is even better because you can also choose the color (.. other than cartoons:biggrin, "other" or black or nothing.

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[Er Presidente]

Now I'm offended, you've made fun of us! No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. The ns is a serious cad, not cartoons. and now it turns out that you always had them but kept them well hidden, so much to make fighetti, the "alternatives".
:hahahahah::hahahahah:

Other jokes,
Why are they "the others"? What do you mean? even in swx choose whether to display them or not, and I confirm that for heavy stuff I have to remove them because they nail everything (but then you get used to it and I almost never use them.. ah, and the quality/definition of the monitor is important for understanding the graphics area).
Indeed, yours is even better because you can also choose the color (.. other than cartoons:biggrin, "other" or black or nothing.

greetings
Marco:smile:

Do you realize? !
years of debate, research, analysis (that from the psychiatrist mica caxxi!), the nasa that almost closes, there have fallen two governments!! !
and now it turns out that the problem was in the file "cosi.coso" what the thing!!

but you won't get away with proe, now I make a call "top" where, if you allow, I have some connections and I will ask in the order:
- total ban for months two for all proe users
- closing of the proe forum and reopening as subforum of "other cad"
- turquoise of all messages in brail, so even the cecati that have consumed the visa working without the "black abortions" can read them
- fund creation of solidarity for former users "I don't have black edges."
- 24 hour forum strike for solidarity

greetings

p.s.: but now that proe makes cartoons "colored", what we do, we put it in the "creative cad" sector?

 

[re_solidworks]

I gladly leave this question , comparing everything to an air conditioner seems excessive.
a consideration however is necessary:
I used the systems with and without edges and, in the passage to the system without edges, I have not suffered neither trauma (I have of other kind) nor slowing down in the work.

the illutrate method above (view the edges) exists at least from the wf3 and is not a novelty of the wf5.
I noticed at the same time one thing, that the systems with the edges are much slower than the systems without, perhaps that's why the ptc tend not to use them.
I tried to load very complex assemblies with one and another system and said right out of the teeth ... there is no bit, you can do all the goats you want pro/e in the management of big assemblies is the best cad that exists on the face of the earth.
we also have a swx license and right these days we are working on a complex machine set and we have to make 300 explosion tables on a customer's project.
boys come milk to the knees, every time we open the assemblies (loaded in light weight) and we have to configure an explosive view we do first to give two hammered on the zebedei and the machine is a hp z600 with nvidia picture fx 4800 and 12 gb ram.
with pros a year ago we worked on a more complex project of this, with 2gb ram machines and 3500 fx card and worked much better.
I don't know if this is the fault of the black edges, but I prefer to have a cad that turns as you must.

The big assemblies in swx are a drama for most users and you have to know how to do them. Unfortunately of people who know how to make them around do not find it because there is no training and research in the matter.
to the swx throw out beautiful news but that they must necessarily hit from the commercial point of view, therefore strive to create ad hoc tools for great assemblies that please 200 users in the world...it is not their interest.
ptc, otherwise, traced the path of the great assemblies and provides specialized training to create and manage them.
I have learned about my mistakes trying to improve, I assure you that you can do and manage, but you have to have personal experience in this matter.

 

[re_solidworks]

we also have a swx license and right these days we are working on a complex machine set and we have to make 300 explosion tables on a customer's project.
boys come milk to the knees, every time we open the assemblies (loaded in light weight) and we have to configure an explosive view we do first to give two hammered on the zebedei and the machine is a hp z600 with nvidia picture fx 4800 and 12 gb ram.

You sold yourself to the enemy... .

 

[Prof.]

config.pro:
show_shaded_edges yes

e poi come nel gif allegato.



arni

I don't have time to read all the discussion but the technique that recommended us hinges, which however works and solves the problem, is nothing but a workaround, that is a trick that bypasses the obstacle. is a particular coloration of the model that allows you to see the black edges. also the same color management interface, which I remember, was also present in wildfire 2, so black edges could be obtained even then. I think we have never thought about it and good at hives that solved a serious issue.

 

[mali_fx]

I don't have time to read all the discussion but the technique that recommended us hinges, which however works and solves the problem, is nothing but a workaround, that is a trick that bypasses the obstacle. is a particular coloration of the model that allows you to see the black edges. also the same color management interface, which I remember, was also present in wildfire 2, so black edges could be obtained even then. I think we have never thought about it and good at hives that solved a serious issue.

I followed the procedure but the tangency edges are not seen or am I wrong in something?

 

[maxopus]

The big assemblies in swx are a drama for most users and you have to know how to do them. Unfortunately of people who know how to make them around do not find it because there is no training and research in the matter.
to the swx throw out beautiful news but that they must necessarily hit from the commercial point of view, therefore strive to create ad hoc tools for great assemblies that please 200 users in the world...it is not their interest.
ptc, otherwise, traced the path of the great assemblies and provides specialized training to create and manage them.
I have learned about my mistakes trying to improve, I assure you that you can do and manage, but you have to have personal experience in this matter.

king, I know that complex assemblies are to be managed well, and the work I know you do the same and manage it, but the difference is and you see everything.

You sold yourself to the enemy... .

It's all my brother's fault, swx was born, and I think he's gone.

I followed the procedure but the tangency edges are not seen or am I wrong in something?

I was referring to this when I said: if you want them like the others... horse bell:biggrin:

 

[cacciatorino]

king, I know that complex assemblies are to be managed well, and the work I know you do the same and manage it, but the difference is and you see everything.
:

I've never used a cad of "high fringe", but it's likely that a cad as pro/e was developed when the mouse was cast iron and the screens were two pixels, led to better optimize certain aspects that were less considered on the products came after.

When I started with the 3d I could already use a "quadro 2", I don't know if I explain (one and a half million liras at the time), but until just before what was there? 3dlabs wildcats for those who were straricco, otherwise... .

 

[maxopus]

I've never used a cad of "high fringe", but it's likely that a cad as pro/e was developed when the mouse was cast iron and the screens were two pixels, led to better optimize certain aspects that were less considered on the products came after.

When I started with the 3d I could already use a "quadro 2", I don't know if I explain (one and a half million liras at the time), but until just before what was there? 3dlabs wildcats for those who were straricco, otherwise... .

hunting I give you reason, pro/e was born in the 88 and 22 years are so many, so much so that the only possible alternative for the era were the unix systems and the first customer of ptc was john deere (just to understand how much money they wanted to buy a software of this type).
to "turn" a parametric cad on platforms of the epoch has surely determined a series of strategic choices for the optimization of resources.

in the 88 I worked on autocad (I didn't even know that 3d parametric cad) on a 80286 system with 640 k ram 20 mega of hd and to launch a print on plotter wanted us a whole series of red horns hanging on the wall, divide the print into blocks manageable by machine and plotter, throw it in the evening and find it ready in the morning after .... hoping that everything didn't jam.