• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

blend corner

  • Thread starter Thread starter matfio
  • Start date Start date

matfio

Guest
Good morning to all
I have a problem with the blend corner (up to top) see "imm01".
I can not have a satisfactory result with nx functions (sto using nx8) attached image "imm02" and "imm03".
I saw that with catia "imm04" the result is satisfactory.
Does anyone know any workarounds?
Thank you very much
 

Attachments

  • imm01.webp
    imm01.webp
    21.7 KB · Views: 32
  • imm02.webp
    imm02.webp
    22.8 KB · Views: 37
  • imm03.webp
    imm03.webp
    21.2 KB · Views: 37
  • imm04.webp
    imm04.webp
    23.3 KB · Views: 41
nx uses parasolid as kernel and cgm chain.
even if the cubes are made in the same way, for the rays of this type use different algorithmic solutions.
So ootb can't do anything.
as for the chain cylinders with the line that cuts the cylinder.
the solution for your problem is to use the delete face without the 'heal' option and then later use the mesh n side command.
if you are not satisfied here, try with patch opening.
If even here you are not satisfied, you have to get a lower number of edges for mesh n side to use as few edges as possible.
Unfortunately, to decrease the edges you have to export the part with the export>heal command and not adding a parametric function in the function shaft.
then attack you and open an er.:biggrin:
 
it would also be necessary to see the curve of both... that perhaps it is more important than to see or not the isoèarametrics of the surface.
 
blackwing,
as you see in my answer I do not despise cad nx.
There are things that catia does best, see this case and there are things that nx does best, see the case of cylinders.
This does not mean that we must not open an er if the cad such does something better.
you stayed at nx 7.5, but if you see nx 8 and nx 8.5 they inserted features present in the casket.
Remember that the cad improves thanks to our reports and not because a product manager decides to insert the 'union trim' of catia in nx.

for matrix,
the cat surface in respect of the fitting is of great invoice, if you want the place to analyze.
 
I just wanted to express my appreciation for the feature.
I happen to use it and I feel good, it's easy to use and edit. Sometimes, but not always, it uses some surface of too much... I often get surfaces that come from other cad and all the times that I come across with copleous surfaces, as in this case, that they would like to manage a bit prope conditions to the contour I detect that something escapes; you want tangences or edges... in the best of cases it is not easy to "adjust" them or change them.
Ultimately I think that the aspects to be evaluated are many, and not only aesthetics.

greetings
 
Utente NX said:
blackwing,
as you see in my answer I do not despise cad nx.
There are things that catia does best, see this case and there are things that nx does best, see the case of cylinders.
This does not mean that we must not open an er if the cad such does something better.
you stayed at nx 7.5, but if you see nx 8 and nx 8.5 they inserted features present in the casket.
Remember that the cad improves thanks to our reports and not because a product manager decides to insert the 'union trim' of catia in nx.

for matrix,
the cat surface in respect of the fitting is of great invoice, if you want the place to analyze.
Click to expand...
If you want to make it a pleasure... even the native file if you get better.
 
attached the connection made with catia (unfortunately in step because I only use nx so I sent it from a colleague)

what I do not understand is how nx has given the possibility to make this kind of connection knowing very well that the result is bad (both as iso and as tangences)
That there's some kind of cat's patent? And what does nx try to turn around?
 

Attachments

Utente NX said:
nx uses parasolid as kernel and cgm chain.
even if the cubes are made in the same way, for the rays of this type use different algorithmic solutions.
So ootb can't do anything.
as for the chain cylinders with the line that cuts the cylinder.
the solution for your problem is to use the delete face without the 'heal' option and then later use the mesh n side command.
if you are not satisfied here, try with patch opening.
If even here you are not satisfied, you have to get a lower number of edges for mesh n side to use as few edges as possible.
Unfortunately, to decrease the edges you have to export the part with the export>heal command and not adding a parametric function in the function shaft.
then attack you and open an er.:biggrin:
Click to expand...
I tried as you say in using nside
As you see in the annex I have no satisfactory result and then at most I can do a g1 with questionable tolerances.
what I see is that the internal edge blend command is valid (as a result) only for small dimensions, while if we talk about aesthetics (larger branches) we do only with a good surface construction and then here we open all another world.
What do you think?
 

Attachments

  • prova raggio.webp
    prova raggio.webp
    22.3 KB · Views: 21
Did you have a doubt? If there was a patent or not?
The patent is not there
if then your problem is doing it with a specific software is another speech (for me)
 
I have not managed to obtain a satisfactory radius in that proposed edge I hope in the future a development of the software towards this issue that is not trivial
to solve the problem I went of splines and surfaces.
 
matfio said:
I have not managed to obtain a satisfactory radius in that proposed edge I hope in the future a development of the software towards this issue that is not trivial
to solve the problem I went of splines and surfaces.
Click to expand...
"He who lives hoping, dies falling.
make an improvement request.
 
in fact nx user I am also dealing with other issues like tritangente face blend (nx8) but I no longer give answers in this forum because I am leaving because I can not give technical answers.
Hello everyone
 
matfio said:
in fact nx user I am also dealing with other issues like tritangente face blend (nx8) but I no longer give answers in this forum because I am leaving because I can not give technical answers.
Hello everyone
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, matfio, but from your statement, I feel like I've been sued.
Allow me to point out that as a moderator I have never intervened in your discussions, if not in the presence of obvious provocations or anything that was contrary to the good education and the rules of the forum.
but I don't remember ever taking measures against you.

I'm sorry about your statements, and if I've been wrong somehow, let me make up for it by giving me arguments about it.
It's always a shame to lose competent people.
 
IPdesign said:
I'm sorry, matfio, but from your statement, I feel like I've been sued.
Allow me to point out that as a moderator I have never intervened in your discussions, if not in the presence of obvious provocations or anything that was contrary to the good education and the rules of the forum.
but I don't remember ever taking measures against you.

I'm sorry about your statements, and if I've been wrong somehow, let me make up for it by giving me arguments about it.
It's always a shame to lose competent people.
Click to expand...
no no indeed I have a great esteem of you and does not center anything this section is just tired of how sometimes you interpret things.... I'm sorry about how things went, but I want to point out that I've always found myself well in this section. Thanks for everything:smile:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
ciao
Back
Top