cad board for technical office

[MarcoBi]

Sure, if you need to model a non-autocad engine.
If you need to model a shoe, do not use autocad.
but if you need to model a plant (and by plant I mean plant, not piping machine) then forget pro-e, sw, if etc.etc. (see Annex).

to model the silencer and the piping of the posted image, autocad is wasted. I would say that you can do with any freeware cad that pays tribute to magazines. Needless to bother pro-e.

if then the discussions always end in style "my is better than your" then ok, it was like when so many years ago it was discussed if it was better the canon or nikon, if it was better the milan or the inter etc.ecc.

 

[The_Matrix]

Sure, if you need to model a non-autocad engine.
If you need to model a shoe, do not use autocad.
but if you need to model a plant (and by plant I mean plant, not piping machine) then forget pro-e, sw, if etc.etc. (see Annex).

to model the silencer and the piping of the posted image, autocad is wasted. I would say that you can do with any freeware cad that pays tribute to magazines. Needless to bother pro-e.

if then the discussions always end in style "my is better than your" then ok, it was like when so many years ago it was discussed if it was better the canon or nikon, if it was better the milan or the inter etc.ecc.

What about the image you posted with our friend's silencer?
Then, you know, as long as the project caller is:
I would like the silencer volume to be always lower than xxx
I would like to understand that structurally happens to the silencer plates if I change the shape so/so
I would like the pipe area to be constant regardless of its section
... and you will see that a cad does not say "serio", but normal is necessary.

 

[Matteo]

What about the image you posted with our friend's silencer?
Then, you know, as long as the project caller is:
I would like the silencer volume to be always lower than xxx
I would like to understand that structurally happens to the silencer plates if I change the shape so/so
I would like the pipe area to be constant regardless of its section
... and you will see that a cad does not say "serio", but normal is necessary.

quoto... here we do not discuss whether it is better than software or other, but whether it is better a way of proceeding or another.

 

[MarcoBi]

ok, if you do the silencer (intensive as a company producing the component) then I can agree that a mid-range cad serves. especially if you make a series product "customized" and for which you also provide a personalized engineering service.
if instead you are a plant supplier (even small, type of emergency engines for fire systems (???) and in your supply is included the 3d model and installation drawings (layout)) then all the parameters we mention do not need.
the author of the discussion of departure did not ask for a cad useful to make stress-analisys of the silencer or fluid-dynamic simulation or something else, but rather a cad that allowed him to obtain a 3d and relative commissioning. he also specified that he uses "carpentery" and "componentistic piping".

 

[Matteo]

ok, if you do the silencer (intensive as a company producing the component) then I can agree that a mid-range cad serves. especially if you make a series product "customized" and for which you also provide a personalized engineering service.
if instead you are a plant supplier (even small, type of emergency engines for fire systems (???) and in your supply is included the 3d model and installation drawings (layout)) then all the parameters we mention do not need.
the author of the discussion of departure did not ask for a cad useful to make stress-analisys of the silencer or fluid-dynamic simulation or something else, but rather a cad that allowed him to obtain a 3d and relative commissioning. has also specified that it uses "carpentery" and "componentistic piping".

Yes it is true, but it was an improper use of the term piping (we are clarified with some pictures).

additional applications quoted by matrix can always serve: I followed (from afar) a work done with solidedge in the piping sector and I must say that at piping level there was absolutely nothing missing of what can serve a planter and in addition the instrument 3d is also lent, when needed, to the approach "particularist" (verification fem, rendering, cfd, parameterization, ...): why "limiting" in departure?

 

[Tequila]

I add that luca who opened the thread wrote:we usually use autocad lt (!!!) and want to evolve without losing the databaseI don't think moving from the lt to the normal equivalga version evolves. Among other things, colleagues have said (see that it has pro/e at home) that can safely use that only by doing training to understand what is the correct approach of use. eventually even if it has a database of several dwg files with all cads you can read quietly. It seems to me that no one has intervened by advertising his own cad as the only and only salvation for the work he has to do, but only that sincerely having a software of all respect in the house is not worth leaving him to rot to use acad lt

 

[maxopus]

I add that luca who opened the thread wrote:we usually use autocad lt (!!!) and want to evolve without losing the databaseI don't think moving from the lt to the normal equivalga version evolves. Among other things, colleagues have said (see that it has pro/e at home) that can safely use that only by doing training to understand what is the correct approach of use. eventually even if it has a database of several dwg files with all cads you can read quietly. It seems to me that no one has intervened by advertising his own cad as the only and only salvation for the work he has to do, but only that sincerely having a software of all respect in the house is not worth leaving him to rot to use acad lt

I tell you, as I said from the beginning, it would seem to me the most logical solution.

Keep pro/e in the drawer and go looking for another parametric cad for me would mean unnecessarily spending money.
then as they say, attack the puppy where the master wants... and so be it.

 

[cacciatorino]

but what does it mean to have a database to be safeguarded? If it's a dwg file collection is an account, if it's a sql or as/400 system that takes data from autocad and automatically generates your cutting distintegration is another!

faces know, bye.

 

[stef_design]

Congratulations... nice work with autocad!! !

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

Don't worry, I already made a demo to the client this morning.

 

[Matteo]

Don't worry, I already made a demo to the client this morning.

tempest!

 

[maxopus]

Don't worry, I already made a demo to the client this morning.

so we do, let people understand what bvp can do (it would say beppe).

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

tempest!

so we do, let people understand what bvp can do (it would say beppe).

The potential is there, just pull them out.
a little days of targeted training and everything will become a game of boys, word of ozzy.:finger: