cad for stone industry

[Fulvio Romano]

I don't quote, because they're too many posts, but I agree with matteo on the whole line.
for that type of work, practically free surface modeling, rhino is a great program (I use alias to do similar things, but the concept does not change). at the limit with alibre you can import the surfaces made with rhino and manage them as solids.

 

[RS4]

hello I put a test made with catia running time 15minuti premetto that are not of your industry but I know catia well

I assure you that with topsolid used especially in the wood sector you go quiet and you put it myself and definitely less when you take your hand.

you don't want to spend excessive money for pro/e inventor catia... and other high-end...

topsolid told by colleagues I used it is really powerful... I almost unloaded it to see it a little:biggrin:


greetings

♪

 

[guyver]

thanks for the answers.. .
I found that inventor lt arrives on 2000 euros sometimes with autocad lt included

to me that you don't need asses and fem and beautiful company I could take a look at.. .
I have to take a look at everything else. :

 

[guyver]

Sorry to abuse your patience. .
I don't understand anything anymore. .
summing up:
problem
evaluate purchase parametric cad and cam 5 axes

As on, there are offers of inventor lt to about 2000 euros, instead I can not find the prices of the cams, also acquaintances in "competitive" firms do not want to tell me or are very vague... use worknc visicam (it seems) pro-e (how did I understand 3000 euros for the 3 axes? ? ? )
what I would simply like to understand before banging the head in quotes various demonstrations is whether, in principle, inventor lt more worknc (or cam 5 axes analogous less expensive if it exists) and pro-e more pro-nc cost the same figure...

If we are there is however preferable the second beyond the initial rock I think.. .

 

[Marley3D]

Sorry to abuse your patience. .
I don't understand anything anymore. .
summing up:
problem
evaluate purchase parametric cad and cam 5 axes

As on, there are offers of inventor lt to about 2000 euros, instead I can not find the prices of the cams, also acquaintances in "competitive" firms do not want to tell me or are very vague... use worknc visicam (it seems) pro-e (how did I understand 3000 euros for the 3 axes? ? ? )
what I would simply like to understand before banging the head in quotes various demonstrations is whether, in principle, inventor lt more worknc (or cam 5 axes analogous less expensive if it exists) and pro-e more pro-nc cost the same figure...

If we are there is however preferable the second beyond the initial rock I think.. .

I believe that your problem at this point is to identify an integrated cad/cam solution. if you have to buy a parametric cad and then a cam also parametric.. Don't you want to look for an integrated cad/cam solution? topsolid is a single solution that allows you to design and mill

As mentioned above, knowing topsolid, I think it can do your case maybe deepen with the missler software

 

[The_Matrix]

Sorry to abuse your patience. .
I don't understand anything anymore. .
summing up:
problem
evaluate purchase parametric cad and cam 5 axes

As on, there are offers of inventor lt to about 2000 euros, instead I can not find the prices of the cams, also acquaintances in "competitive" firms do not want to tell me or are very vague... use worknc visicam (it seems) pro-e (how did I understand 3000 euros for the 3 axes? ? ? )
what I would simply like to understand before banging the head in quotes various demonstrations is whether, in principle, inventor lt more worknc (or cam 5 axes analogous less expensive if it exists) and pro-e more pro-nc cost the same figure...

If we are there is however preferable the second beyond the initial rock I think.. .

Look at some demos to clarify your ideas...
with inventor lt if you have to make a model a minimum "moved" you are walking...
And if you're evaluating a five axes, I think you're in that situation.
I don't tell you to rate the top (nx and cat), but if you don't do "mechanical" stuff don't stop at such a simple cad.