cad per mobili

[Giacomo Lepore]

Good morning.
a question maybe a little strange. Suppose we have a workflow in which an architectural 3d of a furniture arrives, such as a bedroom, a kitchen, furniture for the living room, etc., so let's talk about particle board, mdf, etc.

What I have to do is the engineering of the furniture. means to model the panels, hinges, scrocchetti, define the holes and make the work programs for the machines.
My goal is to compress this phase of work as much as possible, even at the expense of optimizing the flow of production. This is because I want to arrive first on the market with small orders whose poor optimization creates a negligible economic inefficiency).

which software, generic or vertical, is it possible to investigate?

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

on the forum, among others, we have already talked about swood

 

[DrBarde]

buongiorno,
esiste anche woodwork for inventor

 

[Giacomo Lepore]

Okay, thank you very much.

 

[+forte]

Otherwise there is the Italian progeny that turns on microstation

 

[+forte]

or the French topsolid cousin of solidworks

 

[vmirko]

those you're looking for are called cabinet software.
Now there are several houses, from the one that leans on a cad 3d or with proprietary drawing programs or cams that import 3d files and automatically prepare the files to send in the car.
However they are programs that if they have to be integrated even with sezionatrici or bordatrici it is nice complicated.

 

[Giacomo Lepore]

those you're looking for are called cabinet software.
Now there are several houses, from the one that leans on a cad 3d or with proprietary drawing programs or cams that import 3d files and automatically prepare the files to send in the car.
However they are programs that if they have to be integrated even with sezionatrici or bordatrici it is nice complicated.

In fact, I just get to the geometric detail and above all to the distinct.
the geometric conversion > cam I do it with the software of the sawing machine or the edging machine.

 

[meccanicamg]

I think one worth the other. If you have solidworks you can do everything. depends on whether or not you have bookcases and modules to make holes automatically. for expiry with solidworks imposed for example the zipper you have to mount and the associ the working pocket and holes. You do it once and every time after you set up that zipper digs your panel.

 

[vmirko]

as mechanicalmg told you with solidworks you can do what you say,
You just have to get lost behind a little time to get your bookstores and figure out how to organize the way you draw.

 

[+forte]

solidworks i know as well as i know the others presented here and believe me are all parametric, the most used by the carpentry series , is precisely the italian progeny , which is not a byproduct , i used it time ago in a carpentry that made custom furniture for big yatch

 

[Scod]

solidworks I know as well as I know the others presented here and believe me are all parametric, the most used by the carpentry series , is precisely the Italian progeny , which is not a byproduct , I used it time ago in a carpentry that made custom furniture for big yatch

Good morning to all,
I work in a carpentry shop where we do a little volume and everything tailored, we work with inventor+woodwork, although we haven't renewed the subscription for a few years. the choice not to renew came after a period in which we realized that the design times, despite all the customizations made, were too long. I'll explain, from the client's sketch to the distinct sizes and programs made there spend too many hours of work. inventor is a valid program but for our sector it is too sleek. we are wondering whether to switch to a sw closer to a configurator than a 3d modeler as an inventor but I fear to be limited in the export of files to share and in the power of modeling. I know imos as I have a customer who uses it and some foul emerges collaborating at the long time but I do not understand whether it is a problem of sw or user not too experienced. progeny attracts me a lot also for the acquisition of clouds points and frontal management in continuous vein etc... Does anyone have advice? and perhaps know the costs and particular benefits of the two solutions?

Thank you very much