cam visi r2017 multiple processing offset

[wjmat]

Hi.

with the new version of this program can you assign offsets of different machining on different groups of surfaces?
from image below for example, I would like to be able to cut beige surfaces to 0, pink to +0.1 and purple to -1.5?
I would also need a few tips for managing negative rays discharges to avoid falling and then directing it in the cam if it were possiblegrazie

ciao

 

[rinato]

hi wjmat, I think that to work with differentiated offsets you need the command "lista faces" of the solid "model: piece" and the strategy "lav. for isoparametrics" that only works on single faces or groups. However, personally, I have always found it a little ostica to "compil" (though I know how to make turns that others do not have, when planned duty).

or work all at +1.5 and then do localized shooting imprendo the different counts and limits.

otherwise you should create a solid offence in the cad with differentiated offsets (at least I seem to remember that you can, but are commands that I use little ). and then use it such as in the cam.

What do you mean by negative rays? Maybe you're under control?

Greetings, reborn.

 

[wjmat]

Hello again

I knew about the side list option, and we also find it osticated because of the actual management of the direction of the various offsets according to the orientation of the faces, it would not be nice to find itself without material when the offset was positive. . .

I would like to avoid losing time to the cad to build offset surfaces and downloaded rays and do this directly in the cam.

the connection below in green is what I mean negative radius and that tends to in sheet metal molds should always be downloaded
the pink one is the one modified to the cad, in this case it is simple but most of the time it is a variable radius with complex zones and therefore not feasible quickly.

 

[rinato]

I understand the problem, but I believe that the only way to manage it safely is by starting from the cad. however nothing prohibits the interest of the issue, whether the function already exists, perhaps in beta.
You realize that I've been through the "mathematics" of a sheet 8/10 funnel mold, but with a gap between the "hairs" of 10/10 on 90% of the piece (not small ). That's all manual work.
do, then, a little account if your substitute had to repair the mold at that point and read a r5 (a cad), and build a dowel with r5, and when it mounts it finds a r4,5, which in the maths does not result, etc. maybe on a 63hrc piece.. .

good work, anyway,
Reborn.

 

[wjmat]

you one of the options is to feel the assistance.
correct also the situation of repair, in this case it would only have to reuse the same milling program and follow the processing information used the first time.
However I will try to insist with the command list faces

Thank you.

Hi.

 

[rinato]

hi, "insistere" or "repetere" the p.u. of the cam is not very sensible if you have to reconstruct only a zone of the mold (you always retrace everything, trusting not to touch the healthy parts? at least very empty turns, etc.).

I see that you have other sw, don't they lend themselves better than the faces to reshape those rays?

 

[wjmat]

if the area to change or remake is small obviously you do a localized processing but keeping the parameters used previously

ray dripping is a command that now exists in all programs even if not in the basic packages, however heavy modeling we do it with catia

 

[ziotoy]

hi wjmat the command you are looking for is under the analysis menu -->scarico rays.
on simple things works well, on the less complex ones. in that case the areas where it fails you have to do them manually.
with regard to offsets the road to use is definitely "lista faces".
Say hi.

 

[rinato]

hi wjmat the command you are looking for is under the analysis menu -->scarico rays.
...
Say hi.

I miss him.
Is it in some progress or blank package?

 

[wjmat]

hi wjmat the command you are looking for is under the analysis menu -->scarico rays.
on simple things works well, on the less complex ones. in that case the areas where it fails you have to do them manually.
with regard to offsets the road to use is definitely "lista faces".
Say hi.

I know, thank you. We have a station.
we prefer to do all the modeling in catia anyway