• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

catia retailers

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxopus
  • Start date Start date
There's something to say. for a design study there are no big investments to do with decent depreciation. the only serious investment would be a large office (mobile) but must be cushioned in 33 years!! !

productivity software, on the contrary, goes in two years and helps a lot in the years in which it is "come well" and you do not want to find ruined the following year.
this is a good incentive besides what is said by maxopus and that is the possibility to find new customers.
 
Unfortunately the sw are excluded from the tremonti-ter apparently, but a little swx I would do it... .
 
there is also to say that the "new" customers who use catia are few in Italy (small but big) instead with cad type proe, sw, if and inv are many more.

I'll ask you a question.
if a study adopts a cad solution, example cad, it is not said that companies or customers use the same program of the study.
How do you behave in this case?!? is it said, we only use catia and otherwise we only provide neutral files or the study adopts the same cad of the customer? ! ?
If it was the last option, do you know that he has to have the studio? ! ?

I think the customer is not always comfortable with a neutral file (iges, step...) that can not change for subsequent production variants.
Thank you.
 
stef_design said:
If it was the last option, do you know that he has to have the studio? ! ?

I think the customer is not always comfortable with a neutral file (iges, step...) that can not change for subsequent production variants.
Thank you.
Click to expand...
usually the neutral file for the first works is provided, but if the collaboration is consolidated it is advisable to adapt to the company standard, at the end the cost of a mid-range is shocked enough quickly. In short, it depends on the average annual hours you think you're doing for that client. once I had made two accounts for swx, and it had come out that with 150 hours/year for three years big I recovered the investment.

Of course we are not talking about those professionals who have all the cads, just ask....:cool:
 
I have some customers who ask me paper (and do what I want) some who want the natives of swx, others who want them with proes.
If I find someone who offers me work, I don't know how to behave, I'd probably ask him for a minimum of work guaranteed, otherwise I renounce.
I have everything original and in the beginning I drank, and for this rather than installing something irregular renuncio to work, otherwise it was worth not buying anything from the beginning.
It is nice when customers put you in competition with others that cost less but then find out they have no license and took a random pc at large distribution.
 
re_solidworks said:
It is nice when customers put you in competition with others that cost less but then find out they have no license and took a random pc at large distribution.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately then it counts the price and nobody cares if that thing you did with original license or not. There should be + controls. :finger:
 
stef_design said:
Unfortunately then it counts the price and nobody cares if that thing you did with original license or not. There should be + controls. :finger:
Click to expand...
However the solidedge system to put the watermark in pirated files at the end is not bad from my point of view, they told me about a competitor who received the attention of the siemens.. .
 
even if I'm late, I'm willing to hold on to the discussion.
having tried pro_e and using now catia, I can express myself quietly.

catia, it is x times better than pro_e.
its ease of use of management, real and plm are within reach of all.
so if you have one or more products to make, with catia you can count on efficiency
and feasible, being clear and transparent. with 5 days and 2 weeks training
Then do the jobs you want to drink a glass of water.
It's true that it costs something more than pro-e, but if you want quality, it's an ideal tool.

greetings
tree
 
Thank you all for your advice.
I have decided to proceed so: I will call a number of catia retailers (2 or 3), for a demonstration on the topics that I consider most important regarding the activity we carry out.
like this: We do not waste time with chatter we work on projects we have already developed with pro/e, so as to see the possible difference of times and quality (I believe little, to do certain jobs, it still serves the good handle).

If he comes after us well, otherwise there will be no trip for cats. :-)
 
ideacad said:
even if I'm late, I'm willing to hold on to the discussion.
having tried pro_e and using now catia, I can express myself quietly.

catia, it is x times better than pro_e.
its ease of use of management, real and plm are within reach of all.
so if you have one or more products to make, with catia you can count on efficiency
and feasible, being clear and transparent. with 5 days and 2 weeks training
Then do the jobs you want to drink a glass of water.
It's true that it costs something more than pro-e, but if you want quality, it's an ideal tool.

greetings
tree
Click to expand...
You know what's tree-lined, it depends on that "x."
because if x < 1 are belly pains, it is to convince the customer to buy pro/e.
Obviously it is Saturday and you will allow me a little caxxing.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top