chrysler adotta nx

[The_Matrix]

now is more official than ever.
It was hard, but we did it.http://www.media.chrysler.com/newsrelease.do;jsessionid=de6ac67e172c75fc2b27b6283ba0b665?&id=9835&mid=2

 

[IPdesign]

put the link back, you can't see anything

 

[The_Matrix]

http://www.media.chrysler.com/newsrelease.do?&mid=2&id=9835

 

[Zanna91]

Congratulations great job!! :finger:

 

[The_Matrix]

Congratulations great job!! :finger:

Thank you. .
in my small benchmark I made the necessary contribution to the "time". . .
I'm telling you, it's been so hard. but as they say "when the game gets tough."

 

[MBT]

Thank you. .
in my small benchmark I made the necessary contribution to the "time". . .
I'm telling you, it's been so hard. but as they say "when the game gets tough."

... chiamo vickers, brinnel e rockwell ! :finger::finger:

 

[IPdesign]

I call vickers, brinnel and rockwell.

:hahahahahahah: sex... with la sei cercata :biggrin:

 

[incapace]

Thank you. .
in my small benchmark I made the necessary contribution to the "time". . .
I'm telling you, it's been so hard. but as they say "when the game gets tough."

It's been so hard in what way?

chrysler has been of fiat! fiat uses nx for years from the agreement with gm, and still have joint platforms and projects assigned common on tcae servers...
I do not see why chrysler should not automatically adapt to the new masters ....

Perhaps it will be hard to pass all models from the caty pdms that they had to tc ...

as a change of mindset perhaps, even if between v5 and nx changes little in the management of models ... and in the philosophy of modeling ... indeed nx is much more intuitive and versatile than v5 , and allows you to work also "sporty" ... unless there are check mates like those using gm ....

So they won't be struggling to pass from one cad to another... I see it very hard on the pdm side.

 

[cacciatorino]

I see it very hard on the pdm side.

I think the_matrix refers to the implementation work done by the Italian team to migrate chrysler from the dassault system to that siemens, mainly pdm side. that then the motives of change are what you say, it does not rain.

 

[The_Matrix]

It's been so hard in what way?

chrysler has been of fiat! fiat uses nx for years from the agreement with gm, and still have joint platforms and projects assigned common on tcae servers...
I do not see why chrysler should not automatically adapt to the new masters ....

Perhaps it will be hard to pass all models from the caty pdms that they had to tc ...

as a change of mindset perhaps, even if between v5 and nx changes little in the management of models ... and in the philosophy of modeling ... indeed nx is much more intuitive and versatile than v5 , and allows you to work also "sporty" ... unless there are check mates like those using gm ....

So they won't be struggling to pass from one cad to another... I see it very hard on the pdm side.

You will not think that in chr they were open arms waiting for us with nx... It was a very hard battle.
I was at arbourn hill more than a year ago and I tell you that behind the circumstance smiles there were terrible struggles (still in place).
for the pdm all in all was + simple: they had vpm and a casino of other unintegrated systems... tc was a health strike.
vpm > tc had already been experimented in maserati, so we had the right experience.
for data passage v5 > nx: jt to all spy.

the check mate also have the... of course... aligned with fiat check.

 

[incapace]

Man! I didn't realize you'd already made the pass! ! ! !

I was unintentionally polemical!

I apologize!

good work then!:finger:

 

[The_Matrix]

Man! I didn't realize you'd already made the pass! ! ! !

I was unintentionally polemical!

I apologize!

good work then!:finger:

Why do you apologize? ?
the things I liked most about all this "adventure" were:
- to see the "mind switch" of Americans towards these Italian coglio.nazzi with the ring to the nose when we showed him what we knew to do.
- contribute to the growth of nx (nx7.5 and 8 will contain many improvement led by chr) in light of the excellent things made in catia v5.
- see in action nx with the active "multi cad": show

in general in recent times (in truth from the announcement of the v6) the wind in the automotive is turning... it is not said that all automotive oem follow ds in adventure v6.

 

[Er Presidente]

...
the check mate also have the... of course... aligned with fiat check.

Even faisbuc does the "check mates", but honestly I have doubts if it's the same.
:smile:

p.s.: Please tell me the secret, what am I checking ma?

 

[Er Presidente]

...
- to see the "mind switch" of Americans towards these Italian coglio.nazzi with the ring to the nose when we showed him what we knew to do.
...

These are true satisfactions, when you realize that they "look at you" instead of "look at you" with enough.
:biggrin:

 

[The_Matrix]

Even faisbuc does the "check mates", but honestly I have doubts if it's the same.
:smile:

p.s.: Please tell me the secret, what am I checking ma?

check in the sense of "crazy check". . .
is a software that is used to check the parts (there are thousands already ready...) and to write in nx and pdm a "flag" that certifies the fact that the part follows the corporate rules. . .
check is "formal" (e.g., "curves are on layer 6?" or "substantial" (e.g. "the part regenerates correctly?").

 

[stef_design]

in general in recent times (in truth from the announcement of the v6) the wind in the automotive is turning... it is not said that all automotive oem follow ds in adventure v6.

Why, according to you, did ds announce a product like v6?
It's been out for about 2 years, but nowadays, I still have to see a "serious" implementation by some client ds.
according to your opinion, v6 is a jump in the void or a market strategy that unfortunately does not ingrain?
feel free to write what you want...I always read with pleasure your posts:smile:
Hi.

 

[The_Matrix]

Why, according to you, did ds announce a product like v6?
It's been out for about 2 years, but nowadays, I still have to see a "serious" implementation by some client ds.
according to your opinion, v6 is a jump in the void or a market strategy that unfortunately does not ingrain?
feel free to write what you want...I always read with pleasure your posts:smile:
Hi.

I'm not hiding that v6, for the little I know, it's a very fascinating product.
ds is a company that has a very technical "head" and that for "love" of technology makes very courageous choices.
see, however... not always the market is ready to accept these choices.
the past is plan of corpses of technologically excellent products that have not broken down:
- the betamax
- Os2
- the video disc
I could quote hundreds

Why is v6 not widespread so far?
Well, first of all because the platform was presented in advance and was not ready.
second: it is tagged to large companies (you will not believe you can use an infrastructure like cloud computing with 2 catia stations)
third: large companies have very complex plm infrastructure (cad, cae, cam all federated by the pdm talking with the savoury turn etc.).
often ds customers have catia v5 as cad and other pdm (teamcenter, windchill) or pdm ds "traditional" like vpm.
v6 questions this architecture. . .
some ds customers wonder "but why should I risk such an innovative architecture that could be unenforceable and expensive? "
... and instead of introducing the v6 suite maybe think that if they keep tc and implement nx they probably have less problems.
we have a "evolutive" strategy: we change the products... we integrate technology... but we maintain a linear strategy and always have "compatibility" as the first goal.
ds has an "eruptive" approach: evolves little products then, after 10 years, change completely. (v3>v4... v4>v5... now v5>v6),
sure many great ds users have a v6 driver at home...
We'll see what the future holds for us: definitely the competition makes the products improve quickly.