circular flange repeat (folds) sheet: impossible?

[reggio]

... but also just let him use the software they plan for a couple of weeks. . .

 

[re_solidworks]

However, I think that with 2010 it can also be done directly in sheet metal.

 

[re_solidworks]

I'm sorry, but every now and then I start the cumshot.
There's no need for escamotage, here's the footage:www.aureaservizi.com/archive/filmati/serie pieghe/serie su pieghe.html

there is no need for any escamotage even with swx, there are two roads and in this case only one door to the solution.

 

[maxopus]

there is no need for any escamotage even with swx, there are two roads and in this case only one door to the solution.

ohhh king ... and then give 'this answer to the desperate user.
It seemed strange to me that you couldn't do it.

 

[Poly]

more than a kiss (which would be a " mistake") I would say that is a precise choice of programmers.. dictated by what should be asked to them. On the contrary, we should send them at least 6 months in the workshop and then as many in ut:biggrin:.

greetings
Mar

I also believe that in 2009 is not a kiss but an unsupported feature.

 

[Poly]

there is no need for any escamotage even with swx, there are two roads and in this case only one door to the solution.

the second escamotage I proposed allows to have the correct development and works perfectly even without making the circular repetition of the bending.

 

[re_solidworks]

ohhh king ... and then give 'this answer to the desperate user.
It seemed strange to me that you couldn't do it.

I wrote it right away, make the solid and convert to sheet metal at the end. At least you had your time to do the [Bleep]. :biggrin:

 

[maxopus]

I wrote it right away, make the solid and convert to sheet metal at the end. At least you had your time to do the [Bleep]. :biggrin:

to the kings, I think you don't come out of it and there's a reason... you do evidence and let me know.
First you make the solid with the 4 fins, then change and do it with 12 or 10 and then do it again with 6 or 7.

 

[re_solidworks]

to the kings, I think you don't come out of it and there's a reason... you do evidence and let me know.
First you make the solid with the 4 fins, then change and do it with 12 or 10 and then do it again with 6 or 7.

I did, I did this test. I had no problem. I also modified the size of the fins and there are no problems.

 

[maxopus]

I did, I did this test. I had no problem. I also modified the size of the fins and there are no problems.

I believe you, I asked you the question because the approach is different.
better so, I'm not a swx warning and I think it's a nice program.

 

[re_solidworks]

the only flaw I've found, which is probably about the service pack I'm using, is that when the number of instances grows there is no problem, if it falls from an error in the sheet functions because it does not automatically delete the folds that do not exist anymore. I'm sure this is a bug (which I've seen in the past) of this version.
to eliminate this problem just open the function containing the folds and delete those in error that no longer exist.
I have 2009 5.1, maybe with 5.0 or 4.1 does not...

 

[reggio]

However, I think that with 2010 it can also be done directly in sheet metal.

n or even with 2010 (directly in lam I mean)

...in 2009 and 2010 ... we will talk about it in 1 year

 

[-Mc-]

I'm sure this is a bug (which I've seen in the past) of this version.

Yes, it happened to me too! then I did it from scratch with the correct number and now it is correct!

thank you all!! !