haga78
Guest
Hello everyone!
I had written months ago about the partial salary payments by the company and the activation of a procedure.
the salaries then we were paid, but the thing repeated in the following months: a deposit when they give us the envelope, another deposit and then the balance, usually within the month or the next.
this also for the March salary, which I was actually paid only last week.
to today however I should have already received also the salary of April, which instead did not arrive (also a welcome) and we have no news about when it arrives.
Now the problem of salaries is tied to the discussion of the agreed (I said the company had asked for it last year).
the agreed was admitted by the court and the next step is the membership of creditors set in two months. from what I know, if the majority of creditors accept you have the approval of the agreed and therefore everything ok.
now we have been told (our direct superior) that in the verification of creditors by the court employees are also involved: the court should send a recommended to which we should respond by reporting our situation (I don't know what they ask, but I imagine situation payment salary, payments inps, tfr...).
the idea of the company is to delegate to the work consultancy study (which deals with our pay envelopes) the activity to forward the information to the court.
we employees, a little puzzled, in this regard we asked two things:
1) to give us a copy of this delegation before signing it (so that we can show it to someone of trade);
2) the study before sending any communication to the court must ask for authorization (in essence what the study writes must be approved by us in advance).
However, I do not know whether these requests will be accepted and whether they are possible.
My fear is that the study may declare something I do not say false, but at the limit of legality, that in some way in case of a possible future litigation does not give me the chance to have what is mine.
Unfortunately with the time I became very distrustful (some say "to think bad you make sin but often we guess") and sincerely this concern by the company stinks me a little (in the past, as I have already written, for many things were little transparent and elusive).
who tells me for example that they will not pay us the next salaries and in the assembly (in which we will inevitably end up as creditors) by means of the proxy made we will be given only a small percentage of the credit that we boast?
When they give us this document I will see if it is appropriate to sign it, or if I should not sign it and proceed on my own when I receive the recommendation from the court (I do not know however how technically complex it can be to prepare a similar answer).
I had written months ago about the partial salary payments by the company and the activation of a procedure.
the salaries then we were paid, but the thing repeated in the following months: a deposit when they give us the envelope, another deposit and then the balance, usually within the month or the next.
this also for the March salary, which I was actually paid only last week.
to today however I should have already received also the salary of April, which instead did not arrive (also a welcome) and we have no news about when it arrives.
Now the problem of salaries is tied to the discussion of the agreed (I said the company had asked for it last year).
the agreed was admitted by the court and the next step is the membership of creditors set in two months. from what I know, if the majority of creditors accept you have the approval of the agreed and therefore everything ok.
now we have been told (our direct superior) that in the verification of creditors by the court employees are also involved: the court should send a recommended to which we should respond by reporting our situation (I don't know what they ask, but I imagine situation payment salary, payments inps, tfr...).
the idea of the company is to delegate to the work consultancy study (which deals with our pay envelopes) the activity to forward the information to the court.
we employees, a little puzzled, in this regard we asked two things:
1) to give us a copy of this delegation before signing it (so that we can show it to someone of trade);
2) the study before sending any communication to the court must ask for authorization (in essence what the study writes must be approved by us in advance).
However, I do not know whether these requests will be accepted and whether they are possible.
My fear is that the study may declare something I do not say false, but at the limit of legality, that in some way in case of a possible future litigation does not give me the chance to have what is mine.
Unfortunately with the time I became very distrustful (some say "to think bad you make sin but often we guess") and sincerely this concern by the company stinks me a little (in the past, as I have already written, for many things were little transparent and elusive).
who tells me for example that they will not pay us the next salaries and in the assembly (in which we will inevitably end up as creditors) by means of the proxy made we will be given only a small percentage of the credit that we boast?
When they give us this document I will see if it is appropriate to sign it, or if I should not sign it and proceed on my own when I receive the recommendation from the court (I do not know however how technically complex it can be to prepare a similar answer).