compensation for rendering tips

[Superpippo33]

I do not make, I take care of other things, also because partially daltonic:biggrin: :biggrin:
by analogy with the other I do, from the bottom of my experience, I can tell alukino that if he starts to reason so he will not have a big professional future. I better explain: today what you ask will seem enough and enough, for pizza with friends, the new smatphone, the fuel for the car (of Dad) and the weekly exit. but you are laying the foundations of a limited, very limited future. in ten years, with the prices you want to propose, you will not have the money to renew the hardware, software, and we do not talk about contributions, rent etc... know that to carry out a study, with some taxes, contributions and various expenses, it takes about € 2.000,00/month (estimate for defect).
people who will come to you will always expect those prices as a student or hobbyist with performance as a professional, i.e., tight times, quality of the result and more, like let's do it again, other view, let's try to change this other etc...
If you want to spend some time, follow the tips they gave you: attends a study that deals with rendering, but not a simple study, look for among the best and spend your time there, will be a great investment for the future.

Good luck.

 

[Utente cancellato 70856]

I know I'm not very good I've learned to use architecture programs for maybe 1 year, rendering a few months
I started doing it as a pastime (drawing the house of my dreams in 3d and then applying the rengering)
my father is craftsman and one day by chance I heard that one of the geometries he knows asks for rendering for some jobs and I thought this is what I can definitely do I am not goodView attachment 47478Can I earn something?
I saw something on the internet what could I ask?
But you have to help me, I have no idea how to do it.
I have no idea who gives me a tip?

rendering is not a profession, it is an optional to a profession that can be: architect geometra, engineer perito, don't pitch us making rendering, is more paid a dishwasher of a renderer

 

[Tristan]

consider that the gentleman who made rendering of this qualityHe's done shady and puppets (maybe, and I'm saying maybe, because there are too many situations like yours around Italy, fed by those who think that doing the job to the cousin is spared) and now he's working on the floor.
you will also be able to propose occasional collaboration, if those who commission the job agree, but I am ready to bet that the licenses of the software you use are not legal. Do you want to come and sniff out who's been there long before you? You took me for mynchions?

 

[alukino]

Do you know the old man's story calling the street police to report that they're all going to the highway? :wink:

I don't know her but I already realized that I will ask elsewhere the answers so someone will give me cmq 1 thing I happen, fear of competition less bad than I was good

 

[alukino]

consider that the gentleman who made rendering of this qualityView attachment 47481He's done shady and puppets (maybe, and I'm saying maybe, because there are too many situations like yours around Italy, fed by those who think that doing the job to the cousin is spared) and now he's working on the floor.
you will also be able to propose occasional collaboration, if those who commission the job agree, but I am ready to bet that the licenses of the software you use are not legal. Do you want to come and sniff out who's been there long before you? You took me for mynchions?

I don't take anyone for mynchion or coglionare sta cmq of fact that as you have just done, using (intelligently) the word "committee" does not accus anyone and you are very free to do it to diversity of others, I will be strange I but I strongly shock to point my finger without proof.

 

[Tristan]

less bad I wasn't good

You're not. a rendering like yours would do anyone after a training course of a few dozen hours. You want an estimate for that rendering? If I were the client I would give you to max 50€, nothing more! and consider that I would put it back as you did not take more than a couple of hours to do so, with software probably not fired.

 

[gil]

for my old forum colleagues.i think you're making acid blood for nothing. if we're wrong, he's a good alukin who's been able to put on a business.
if we're right, worse for him.

then i understand your speeches about piracy, quality and other, but none of us is agent of bsa, and it is useless to insist.

good and profitable work to all.

 

[cacciatorino]

for my old forum colleagues.I think you're making acid blood for nothing. If we're wrong, he's a good alukin who's been able to put on a business.
If we're right, worse for him.

then I understand your speeches about piracy, quality and other, but none of us is agent of bsa, and it is useless to insist.

good and profitable work to all.

but no one offends, just smiles to see the young man who mates specific ignorance and human arrogance. Maybe she'll have a bright professional life, I hope so!

 

[MBT]

Who knows why everything reminds me of a certain gabberman.. .

https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/5524-help-preventivi-urgente

 

[marcof]

marcof is already a smarter fur than used the term I bet without accusing )indefinitely)

I'm sorry I was misunderstood and especially that you misjudged me.
Let's see if I can make myself understand this time: I'm sure you're only using pirate software!

 

[MBT]

I don't know her but I already realized that I will ask elsewhere the answers so someone will give me cmq 1 thing I happen, fear of competition less bad than I was good

definitely don't scare anyone with your grammar.
I doubt you can scare someone with your renders.
I don't have the ability to do it, I do anything else, but I assure you that stuff was done 15 years ago with software and hardware of time.
today as today you can make that they would be confused with photos also from one of the field. . .
You, fortunately, don't get that far. therefore do not fall within the "competition"
- - - updated - - - -

I'm sorry I was misunderstood and especially that you misjudged me.
Let's see if I can make myself understand this time: I'm sure you're only using pirate software!

Now that I understand it, I agree with you.

 

[alukino]

I'm sorry I was misunderstood and especially that you misjudged me.
Let's see if I can make myself understand this time: I'm sure you're only using pirate software!

Look, I'm telling you one thing, then, very free to think what you want, with the (only and exclusively) you've got a bad cmq free to not believe me.
cmq continues to accuse without proof compliments

 

[Cristallo]

consider that the gentleman who made rendering of this qualityView attachment 47481

trying to coat the tones a bit, and staying on the theme even if slightly ot:
but according to you, is it correct to produce renderings that (such as this tristan post), are so perfect to be exchanged for reality?
I mean: lacks the recognisability of "artfact", of non-originality.
a little like the restorations: the superintendencies claim that the intervention of restoration is made with similar and compatible materials, but must remain trace and be perceived what is original from what is the restoration operation.
I look at this making I remain a little doubtful: Is it so perfect to look true even in the eyes of a chewing photo, or is it a real photo shot to make?

 

[MBT]

trying to coat the tones a bit, and staying on the theme even if slightly ot:
but according to you, is it correct to produce renderings that (such as this tristan post), are so perfect to be exchanged for reality?
I mean: lacks the recognisability of "artfact", of non-originality.
a little like the restorations: the superintendencies claim that the intervention of restoration is made with similar and compatible materials, but must remain trace and be perceived what is original from what is the restoration operation.
I look at this making I remain a little doubtful: Is it so perfect to look true even in the eyes of a chewing photo, or is it a real photo shot to make?

There was a good discussion here...
https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/4537-meglio-una-foto-o-un-render

 

[Utente cancellato 70856]

consider that the gentleman who made rendering of this qualityView attachment 47481He's done shady and puppets (maybe, and I'm saying maybe, because there are too many situations like yours around Italy, fed by those who think that doing the job to the cousin is spared) and now he's working on the floor.
you will also be able to propose occasional collaboration, if those who commission the job agree, but I am ready to bet that the licenses of the software you use are not legal. Do you want to come and sniff out who's been there long before you? You took me for mynchions?

he is almost exceptional good, maybe the exceptional no longer exists, probably he left because of the marketplaces making absurdly low prices

trying to coat the tones a bit, and staying on the theme even if slightly ot:
but according to you, is it correct to produce renderings that (such as this tristan post), are so perfect to be exchanged for reality?
I mean: lacks the recognisability of "artfact", of non-originality.
a little like the restorations: the superintendencies claim that the intervention of restoration is made with similar and compatible materials, but must remain trace and be perceived what is original from what is the restoration operation.
I look at this making I remain a little doubtful: Is it so perfect to look true even in the eyes of a chewing photo, or is it a real photo shot to make?

with today's sw all can, it only takes patience
I want to post some examples to make understand the current prices:
this image is of an Italian site with a lot of pricehas some imperfections like the pillows too rigid, but is so much the amount of things rendered, is worth doing this job for120 euros?
when then there are marketplaces like daz3d that give you for 16 dollars:

 

[Cristallo]

he is almost exceptional good, maybe the exceptional no longer exists, probably he left because of the marketplaces making absurdly low prices

Well, I still said something different.
looking at the photos you posted, regardless of the amount of rendered objects, I recognize on the flight that is a render.
you want for prospect deformations, you want for the unnaturality of some objects (like pillows you highlighted) etc.

And I think that makes it. give an idea, even very close to reality, but that it is recognizable as non-existent to a look that is not superficial.
the image of tristan shatters perfection. Looking at it is doubtful that it is only a render for the management of the lights, that because of the great difference of brightness between the outside sky and internal lighting that would confuse the great exposimeter of modern digital.
but to make me arise this doubt, it takes a good infarination of photography.
Also the shooting point is not to render, it is more similar to a photo made a low person with the reflex in hand.
that to say that in my opinion these levels of rendering serve other... for example in the cinema field.

 

[alukino]

Here are the remote changes of a few weeks I took inspiration from the photo of a modern house and I made a 3d of it and then rendered now that you say how they are

 

[MBT]

I like the sky.

 

[ceschi1959]

Don't ask questions whose answers you may not like, I join mbt and not completely.

 

[Tristan]

I say you better watch this movie.
[video=youtube;F59bHgEX338]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f59bhgex338[/video]all in real time and wanting in vr.
your rendering could make sense 15 years ago; now with these results you can only accompany.. .