component replacement in multiple axioms

[Bobo75]

Good morning I have a new question. I have the need to replace a component present in multiple assemblies. How can I do that? Is this an operation that you can do via smart team or not? in itself were opened all the assemblies in which the component "incriminate" was present through revision managers and replaced in all the component, or was saved by name with all the open and automatic assemblies replaced (and if it was the same article to which maybe the code changed or little other kept you also all the constraints.. .
if someone can help me thank you in advance

 

[falonef]

Hi.
open all assemblies and replace the component with the specific command

 

[Bobo75]

I apologize for my ignorance due to the fact that I did not do any course for this program, what would be the appropriate command?

 

[falonef]

no controversy but how do you work without attending the course?

in any case select the component in the logical tree and with the right click you will find the option to replace it.

tipp: in the online help, very well done, find the description of the various commands

 

[Bobo75]

Hello, falonef. Thank you.
I know but you either eat soup or jump from the window, and today as I eat cold soup today... I am finding many difficulties in adapting to this program that in some situations I find really complicated, especially in the management of the assemblies that always lose my constraints whenever I make a slight change to a component.
but the operation you say replaces me the component in the specific one together and then I have to repeat the operation for each set, or opening them all, if I replace it in one I go to replace it in all open ones?

 

[falonef]

no should not automatically replace the components despite opening various assemblies in the current session.

I would also think it fatal!

constraints jump because public elements were not used...

ps: I understand your situation. . .
do you have the option to use at least the online for self-taught purposes?

 

[gianni55]

I agree with what Falonef said,
I add that you can create a new product father, in which to insert all the products you want to replace the components, then select the component and put the check mark on replace all the components, and you will see them replaced in all the products, then from saving management save all the products except the product father created only for the purpose.
I remind you that the name of the celebrations remain unchanged and that you can change with the appropriate macro.

years ago

 

[Bobo75]

Now I'll see to myself studying these public elements. I build the assemblies a little as my colleague explained to me and a little as I always did with solid edge before. There are many things that put me in trouble like the absence of a system of plans bound to zero in the axieme. Thank you. Turns out it's a big mess to fix

 

[Bobo75]

Thank you.
I'll try this thing tomorrow for my father. In practice amount within all the set that have the component I need and then I make a substitution all?
I ask a further question, but if with this system I would make a rescue with the name of the component that interests me by making a new raise that changes the code of the component, in this way I would go to replace it and update it by binding it to all the assemblies and therefore also in smart team for all the "sons" inside the initial cauldron?

 

[falonef]

Thank you.
I'll try this thing tomorrow for my father. In practice amount within all the set that have the component I need and then I make a substitution all?
I ask a further question, but if with this system I would make a rescue with the name of the component that interests me by making a new raise that changes the code of the component, in this way I would go to replace it and update it by binding it to all the assemblies and therefore also in smart team for all the "sons" inside the initial cauldron?

It does not work entirely because if you have various sub-assistances in your father's aid, in order to replace a compote, you must first activate its set > will be coloured with the blue background > that is to indicate which document is currently active, so the others are, I would dare say > extinguished.

the change you will have to do it manually for each set, activating it first with a doubleclic on its name.

 

[falonef]

Now I'll see to myself studying these public elements. I build the assemblies a little as my colleague explained to me and a little as I always did with solid edge before. There are many things that put me in trouble like the absence of a system of plans bound to zero in the axieme. Thank you. Turns out it's a big mess to fix

in caia v5 in the axieme there are no plans bound to zero. When you import the 1. component you will need to make sure to fix it in space > uses the bond symbol again.

on this component you will assemble all your assembly and consequently you will refer to its axle system.

if you need to assemble a tool machine, insert the frame as 1. component after which you will assemble everything else.

so much to understand, do not enter as 1. component an external plate fixing screw

ps: if you use catia v5, turn off the solidedge switch, solidworks, cocreate etc. learn to know cv5 and only after a while begin to compare the working methodologies applied in the different cads you know.

Don't let your instincts crash at the beginning.

in the forum I posted several interesting things.
search with google also videos that will be useful to you.
Good research.

I hope I helped you.

 

[gianni55]

I'll try this thing tomorrow for my father. In practice amount within all the set that have the component I need and then I make a substitution all?

this provided that the parts of the product do not conflict because they have the same file name, but they are stored in different folders, otherwise I miss the loads that goes into conflict.. .

I ask a further question, but if with this system I would make a rescue with the name of the component that interests me by making a new raise that changes the code of the component, in this way I would go to replace it and update it by binding it to all the assemblies and therefore also in smart team for all the "sons" inside the initial cauldron?

I'm sorry, but I don't know what you're doing, and I don't want you to end up in a juniper. .

or are you in possession of a pdm that manages updates with security, or you have to maintain a storage structure that is error-proof, e.g. the development of the design takes place in a wip folder and concerns only new elements while the particular standards that are stored (from the senior) in a specific read-only folder, and to finished project the senior archives everything in the final area that will be that used by the fresa or exported to the supplier.

design variants change name or take a suffix, names or better codes must be "parlanti" I make an example: if the company is called "politechnic" what it plans is called pol, 19 a year, 000 the shop, gr 00 the product father, 001 the part
therefore pol19166gr01232 a project made in 2019 whose commission is 166 the particular 232 that belongs to group 01 etc.

 

[gianni55]

... the absence of a system of plans bound to zero in the axieme.

I agree with falonef, and I add that if you really feel the need you can insert a neutral part that contains only the reference plans and/or a terna of origin, this becomes a standard, create it once and put it in archive: will be the first part that loads in a product (and by-products) and that you will fix with the anchor, from develop the project. that part you will use it even when a symmetry plane will be necessary within the product, using it as a mirror for the parts and as a new rotation for the screws or components not symmetrical

 

[Bobo75]

you can insert a neutral part that contains only the reference plans and/or a terna of origin, this becomes a standard, create it once and put it in archive: will be the first part that loads in a product (and by-products) and that you will fix with the anchor, from there develop the project

Thank you very much, this is something that could be very helpful to me for the creation of assemblies, without overturning my modus operandi until now...
Of course, I'm pushing to do a course, but I think it's not gonna be a real thing before 2021... for now I'm shaking my teeth and I'm seeing a little bit of the program.
sure that the absence of the stp module is something that complicates my life a lot because too often igs do not close well and then find the problem and fix it takes away a bust of time.. .

 

[gianni55]

sure that the absence of the stp module is something that complicates my life a lot because too often igs do not close well and then find the problem and fix it takes away a bust of time.. .

Unfortunately, the fire must be lit with the wood available. . .

try to change the import of igs:

tools-options-general-compatibility-igs- import - advanced optimization- parameters - topological edge reduction (sent)
possibly test deformation with 0.002 or 0.005

to close an igs:

after importing it, when you make the union, eventually increases a little tolerance and then select only a surface and dx key - angular propagation, the selection will stop in non manifold elements, double surfaces or fork error that you can locate and delete. you will get tangency groups and without the problematic surfaces that you will easily identify and correct (reface)

Let me know.

 

[falonef]

to use file steps you need the st1 license.

 

[Bobo75]

I imagined it would take a special license (and forgive me if I consider it a porcade calculating that the stp module is present on cad much less blasonati than this already in the basic licenses) in the end with some igs I left them as they are so much I do not have to modify them and I inserted them in the assemblies. I have to change it, and I don't have time to lose.
Thank you gianni55 that making me increase the parameters has solved a lot of wood at least on the great majority of the files we import.