• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

cone development tracking lines

  • Thread starter Thread starter MARCOC
  • Start date Start date

MARCOC

Guest
hello to all...domandone

and possible to make sure that on the flat model a cone are reported trace lines? ? ? ?
1622219979705.webpI tried to exhaust the command line of division, but then develops more cone and by mistake the flat model1622220160474.webp
 
MARCOC said:
Guys. ..no one has ever had need to have trace lines on laser cutting dxfs
Click to expand...
hi, create the cone by means of 2 sketches on two floors (even not parallel), the sketch should be opened (even 0.1mm) then create sheet with loft, choose bent manufacturing method and from there you can set the number of stools, or the angle of each fold. so in flattening to dxf tracks the fold lines. Good day
 
Thank you valter, but that method there is no good...because I get the cone for displacement... mine must be lines of traction....with inventor I can get....so surely also with solid you can
 
MARCOC said:
Thank you valter, but that method there is no good...because I get the cone for displacement... mine must be lines of traction....with inventor I can get....so surely also with solid you can
Click to expand...
hi, I also get it in dizzying as well as bending, and with this method I draw with the laser the lines you indicated in your first post. I don't understand your question.
 
the problem and that I get the cone for revolution not using the loft...and I need the cone to be modeled smoothly and not with the folds. .
 
I tried both with all the faces and with one.... always nothing works
1622393141830.webpthe image and obtained with inventor, if it succeeds inventor surely you can do also with solid, and only understand how...but unfortunately solid I do not know it so thoroughly to succeed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've tried all of them... I think I can say that solid can't handle the divisions on tin plate.
 
I saw the function shaft in the first post. to make the calandrate cone I would make a loft with two open profiles, and the openings on the two profiles must be corresponding.
on the outer surface of the cone you make your traces as if they were normal and bound sketches.
extend the sheet, in the table setting, but activate the display of the sketches.
 
Wintel said:
I saw the function shaft in the first post. to make the calandrate cone I would make a loft with two open profiles, and the openings on the two profiles must be corresponding.
on the outer surface of the cone you make your traces as if they were normal and bound sketches.
extend the sheet, in the table setting, but activate the display of the sketches.
Click to expand...
it can't work because the sketch would be bound to the calandrate and not to flattening. if instead you have verified it post the file that we learn something new
 
the problem basically, correct me if I say a cagata, there is in the fact that in the flattening the sheet must have constant thickness on the warp areas so it is not possible to make markings, understood both as sketch and as thin cuts not passing, on the calandrato; markings that can be done on the flat surfaces of the classic plates.
a little orthodox method therefore is to draw the sketch of the area to mark and make an engraving (wind function) with complete removal of the material.
 
the result must be that on the flat model I have to have some sketch fins that though are drawn on the model
 
MassiVonWeizen said:
it can't work because the sketch would be bound to the calandrate and not to flattening. if instead you have verified it post the file that we learn something new
Click to expand...
I didn't check. I use this procedure for flat folds and, in fact, on curved surfaces it is not possible, at least directly and without resorting to artificial.
I try to make some effort, you never know.
 
MassiVonWeizen said:
the problem basically, correct me if I say a cagata, there is in the fact that in the flattening the sheet must have constant thickness on the warp areas so it is not possible to make markings, understood both as sketch and as thin cuts not passing, on the calandrato; markings that can be done on the flat surfaces of the classic plates.
a little orthodox method therefore is to draw the sketch of the area to mark and make an engraving (wind function) with complete removal of the material.
Click to expand...
but here who are you asking to correct you?? to whom is the disappointment to me?? ?
 
MARCOC said:
but here who are you asking to correct you? ?
Click to expand...
to no one in particular. Since this is a hypothetical explanation made for deduction, I put my hands forward and emphasize the fact that I could say a stupidity so, in case someone has a more solid explanation well come to correct me. paraphrasing such if I am mistaken you will
MARCOC said:
to whom is the disappointment to me?? ?
Click to expand...
I shall say
 
Thank you. @marcoc to keep us updated.
find me in the situation I can deny my last statement #13 and say that the markings on calandrates can be made
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top