configurations

[ceschi1959]

Sorry 'intromission' but they advised me to ask here a question that I had placed on the forum of solid edge where a user asked if they would ever implement sw configurations.
the question is this:
Suppose we have a three-part configuration (which, if I understand correctly, are within a single file), is drafting common or is there one part? If I change a feature of only one of the three parts, for example, I add a hole, how do I manage the revisions?
thanks to those who want to answer.
c.

 

[Atreiou]

the three parts are in a defined file together, if the three parts are different you will then have 4 files in total

the axieme can have configurations that make var the way the 3 parts are together, changing the couplings between them for example. .

then parts can have configurations that change their shape and much more.

As long as the couplings used in the axieme have references (plans, axes, points, surfaces) used, everything works and configurations in the axieme can vary.

when the configuration of a disability part a reference used in the couplings of the axieme, the coupling will present an error. .

I hope I'm explained.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

is more correct to say that there is a part with three configurations as the configurations are contained in the part/assieme file.
said this at the design level you can have a design for configuration, a unique design with all configurations on the same sheet, a design with all configurations on dedicated sheets according to the management of the company. on the design then you can recall the properties of the individual configurations so that, for example, you can create three different cards.
since each configuration has personal properties you can also insert revision indexes so the part without hole will have revision 0, that with the round hole revision 1 and that with the framework hole revision 2; the revision index will be recallable on the chart.
then according to the changes that are made it is possible to start from a single table and changing the reference of the views recover more or less as already done.
this speech is valid both at the level of part and together; in the case of assemblies the different materials are recallable for each type of configuration then hypothesize to have a configuration to and a b can make the configuration design to and separate materials to and change both in configuration b without having to cancel or insert anything

 

[ceschi1959]

I thank everyone for the answers. :
I asked for further clarification in relation to this situation:

from what I understood only file with n configurations.
I have seen, and I ask confirmation, use the configurations with a model with various phases of processing 'defeaturizzando' the finished model at various stages of processing. I with nx would do exactly the opposite starting from the rough-grain with so many linked files how many processing is.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

you can do it quietly with the configurations getting for each one a specific distinct

 

[re_solidworks]

Sorry 'intromission' but they advised me to ask here a question that I had placed on the forum of solid edge where a user asked if they would ever implement sw configurations.
the question is this:
Suppose we have a three-part configuration (which, if I understand correctly, are within a single file), is drafting common or is there one part? If I change a feature of only one of the three parts, for example, I add a hole, how do I manage the revisions?
thanks to those who want to answer.
c.

to clarify a bit, the solidworks configurations are very similar to the family table of creo parametric. the difference lies in the management: with solidworks you are not obliged to switch from a table, but you can simply create a new configuration by hand and change the model directly.
to give you another example, the development of sheet metal parts is a derived configuration. in the flat configuration are resolved the functions that perform the flattening, while in the default these functions are suspended.
another example. when I have a complex and heavy set for the cpu I often make a light configuration. in this configuration I suspect all the contents of the axieme (except the skeleton) and insert a simplified part of encumbrance. also for this use configurations.
if you want to make a simpler level of simplification you could suspend all internal components, all commercials and load parts in a lighter configuration.

playing with the possibilities offered you can do anything, I have always kept myself at a fairly basic level, to simplify the next management of the project.

 

[superspanck]

good morning, if I have configuration to and create a configuration to it derived b, in the bom of b there is way to see dependence with a?

banally I have a component in yellow brass (a) that I have to nickel (b) and I would like it to appear in the bom of b.

Thank you.

 

[re_solidworks]

good morning, if I have configuration to and create a configuration to it derived b, in the bom of b there is way to see dependence with a?

banally I have a component in yellow brass (a) that I have to nickel (b) and I would like it to appear in the bom of b.

Thank you.

no, configurations do not depend on one from the top as a part in a subaxieme.