configured part properties and design

[tanticapelli]

Hey massive, always on the front line, huh?

the section you talk about has been rotated with the wheel function seen to make it a little more comfortable to read to the supplier, and I also interrupted the alignment with the view from which it comes.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Was it no longer logical and understandable to do the section on the top view? I only got there because I remembered the file you posted in this discussion https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads...etizione-parti?p=404943&viewfull=1#post404943In the sections you can add the rotation note.

 

[tanticapelli]

Was it no longer logical and understandable to do the section on the top view? I only got there because I remembered the file you posted in this discussion https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads...etizione-parti?p=404943&viewfull=1#post404943In the sections you can add the rotation note.

It's real massive from the top left view I could have and I shouldn't have turned the view. But if I've been so long, the dashes would have stayed. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

perhaps with the whole design is more understandable the section than from a monk image, but in my opinion not immediately intuitive
if you attach a file with the problem you can take a look at.

 

[drake]

the problem gives me both on 2016 sp0 and sp5.

I attach two screenshots made to the flight:


in the first you see the section line detached from the arrows (in the case of the section treated from interrupted view) and in the second the same thing in the case of a view without interruption.

in the first screenshot that I had posted with red circles some more intervention on there was a thinner section line that connected the arrows but I did it because I didn't like the arrows so usual.

did you have how to deal with the problem?

Thank you.

so many hairs

I have no idea what that could be. I did some evidence, but the lines don't make them. If you attach your file we can try with that.