Mario Napodano
Guest
What do you think?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
AginoA
Guest
as much as I think it is a good project but it must still be refined (it is interesting and useful implementation with all the programs acca).
from the point of view of the architectural design I believe that it will never be able to equal ac either by number of available library objects, or by potential (see for example the latest photorendering possibilities of version 18 out).
excluding this I think it is a great design program, depends on what you have set yourself up in your profession.
from the point of view of the architectural design I believe that it will never be able to equal ac either by number of available library objects, or by potential (see for example the latest photorendering possibilities of version 18 out).
excluding this I think it is a great design program, depends on what you have set yourself up in your profession.
Geometra72
Guest
guys I "use" (the quotes are mandatory) buildingsus for more than a year. How do you define it "a good project that must still be refined" just I don't know! I say it with all respect; especially if those who say it do not have the program and tried it for a few days (although after a few days you can realize that it serves very little). Buildingus is a disaster with which it is impossible to work. I challenge anyone to make us even the most trivial and simple work.
take a look (not superficial) to the graphic plates produced by edifiucius: elements that should be seen and that there are not and vice versa; impossible to get shady prospects; graphics (in the tables!!!!) from cartoon; approximate architectural elements; assonometric views where elements are missing or the viewing priority is not respected (e.g. an element that should cover another one because in the foreground but does not).
not to mention the difficulty in the realization of model 3d: relationship between elements on contiguous levels; impossibility of solid modeling if not interfaced with sketchup; snap little or not practical, lack of architectural objects fundamental for architectural design or building in general: lack foundation plinths, the possibility to realize countertops!!! (this is incredible) etc.
comparison with archicad is not likely. less than ever the comparison with allplan, on all the sw for those who want to work. if I had not spent 2,800,00 euros approximately (including a mandatory year of amicus service) I would have already taken allplan, which I tried for a month in the version 30th edition and that I will acquire as soon as possible.
Excuse the vent. Hello, colleagues.
take a look (not superficial) to the graphic plates produced by edifiucius: elements that should be seen and that there are not and vice versa; impossible to get shady prospects; graphics (in the tables!!!!) from cartoon; approximate architectural elements; assonometric views where elements are missing or the viewing priority is not respected (e.g. an element that should cover another one because in the foreground but does not).
not to mention the difficulty in the realization of model 3d: relationship between elements on contiguous levels; impossibility of solid modeling if not interfaced with sketchup; snap little or not practical, lack of architectural objects fundamental for architectural design or building in general: lack foundation plinths, the possibility to realize countertops!!! (this is incredible) etc.
comparison with archicad is not likely. less than ever the comparison with allplan, on all the sw for those who want to work. if I had not spent 2,800,00 euros approximately (including a mandatory year of amicus service) I would have already taken allplan, which I tried for a month in the version 30th edition and that I will acquire as soon as possible.
Excuse the vent. Hello, colleagues.