"consolidate" flexible assemblies in idw

[GiGa]

I have a number of supports in which sheet metals must be placed compared to pipes in a certain position not defined "by quotation".
I therefore made the axioms of the supports flexible and correctly positioned the plates compared to the pipes. All right.
the problem arises in the table of the support axieme as I can not keep the plates in the exact position, but they are reported in the approximate position where I put them assembling the support itself.

a few tips on how to "consolidate" the exact position of the plates in the support axieme (and then in the idw)?

 

[Tarkus]

I understand that:
plates and supports are in the same assemblies, but the positioning of
plate with respect to the supports by binding sheet metal to the piping of a higher level unit?

If so, in the upper axieme you do so many levels of detail for each "support + sheet" where there are only the components you want to put on the table and then make many tables for how many your levels of detail are. .

:redface: always that I understood well...:smile:

 

[GiGa]

you got it right:

It was just the solution I thought about, just that it seemed like "discussed."
Actually, the mistake is my... I didn't have to make the asses "flexible", but "adactive". and so I managed to get what I needed.. .

for a "mental plate" (not supported by anyone), in case of positioning constraints, I was thinking first of all of flexibility, in case of shapes and sizes first I thought about adactivity.

Anyway, thank you.

 

[Tarkus]

you got it right:

It was just the solution I thought about, just that it seemed like "discussed."
Actually, the mistake is my... I didn't have to make the asses "flexible", but "adactive". and so I managed to get what I needed.. .

for a "mental plate" (not supported by anyone), in case of positioning constraints, I was thinking first of all of flexibility, in case of shapes and sizes first I thought about adactivity.

Anyway, thank you.

bhe, it's not a mental tara, I avoid the act like the plague. not always works and often causes strange troubles....:biggrin:

 

[marcocom]

If I understand your problem well and use inventor 2012 you have to use the position constraints so you don't have to make so many tables but only one