Constraint position - insert

[Il Mauri]

good morning to all, I would like a council on the use of the "insert" bond (the chiodin to understand us) to assemble cylindrical parts.
I have read from various discussions that this type of constraints sometimes (often?) from problems.
I would therefore like to know if it is the case of avoiding it on a little sensitive assemblies, where perhaps flexibility is activated and replace it with classical constraints (face/face and axis/axis and possibly angle positioning). or perhaps it is the case of avoiding it even on simple assemblies that however I cannot exclude that a tomorrow will be placed on other much more complex assemblies?

Thank you and I wish you good work

 

[Tarkus]

You answered yourself, I'll know I don't really like that bond, but if you avoid it, it's better...

 

[pompeo79]

bè the insert bond works very well. is also convenient and fast, in one command removes 5 degrees of freedom.
does nothing more, puts maternal bond face and coaxial in one command.
but it has the reverse of the medal, it also takes a lot of flexibility in the overall control of your team and its cinematisms.

 

[Il Mauri]

Okay, I'll see to use it on "light" assemblies while on the heaviest and most sensitive ones I will use the classic constraints that would seem to be less subject to malfunction. I prefer to invest a little more time hoping to have less problems in the future.

Thank you all

 

[GiGa]

Mah... I've been having a big problem in a heavier group lately with constraints that they "go to the ball"... I must admit, however, that the use of the insert bond has a little improved (unresolved) the situation. . .