sir--kris
Guest
My version is v5.17.
I am having a doubt about a type of "general" bond, i.e. a bond of non-compnetration of all the components of my group.
How do I impose this general bond?
I put a simple example:
pretend to have a parallelepiped with inside a pocket, and then put in the pocket a smaller cube of the pocket...I guess as a small nut inside a box of open matches.
Here... I put the joint of flatness.
After that there is no function in dmu kinematics...to limit the various movements until I reach the interconnection...but it leaves me free the possibility to move it flatly...and maybe even rotate it on its perpendicular axis on the plane?
I also tried with the prismatic joint... but it leaves me only a translation!
It is clear that if I then put to och the "limits" of the excursion .... I have no compenetrations... but I imagined there was a function... that automates everything!
Bye-bye
I am having a doubt about a type of "general" bond, i.e. a bond of non-compnetration of all the components of my group.
How do I impose this general bond?
I put a simple example:
pretend to have a parallelepiped with inside a pocket, and then put in the pocket a smaller cube of the pocket...I guess as a small nut inside a box of open matches.
Here... I put the joint of flatness.
After that there is no function in dmu kinematics...to limit the various movements until I reach the interconnection...but it leaves me free the possibility to move it flatly...and maybe even rotate it on its perpendicular axis on the plane?
I also tried with the prismatic joint... but it leaves me only a translation!
It is clear that if I then put to och the "limits" of the excursion .... I have no compenetrations... but I imagined there was a function... that automates everything!
Bye-bye