conversion together

[Bonve]

Hello I would have a simple question:

I have a series of assemblies that in turn will go to be part of various assemblies (machine parts that are compatible in many machines).
Now, given the heaviness and quantity of files to be exported (pack&go mainly) there is a command that makes me a unique piece not editable to be able to insert into other axis? (it should be much lighter and with only 1 file instead of 60-70-80 parts at a time)

Thank you.

 

[stefanobruno]

new ipt, comes component, choose the axiemon, wait the time due, depending on the complexity of your set and the performance of the pc.
at this point, in the derived joint window, choose the lav style button. derived (read the help when you move the cursor to the icons), for your case I would say the first left, with the two cubes intersected without distinction, although the second from a better visual result.
last step, press ok, wait patiently and make the last choice you need, i.e. if you want to maintain, suppress or interrupt the association with the main set.
your request is met by the interruption of the connection, the other two take you behind the basic files.
armed with holy patience or take a walk in waiting for processing.

ps. : save everything before you start the task, you may need to stop the processing process with dramatic consequences and loss of what you have done and not saved.

 

[Il Mauri]

new ipt, comes component, choose the axiemon, wait the time due, depending on the complexity of your set and the performance of the pc.
at this point, in the derived joint window, choose the lav style button. derived (read the help when you move the cursor to the icons), for your case I would say the first left, with the two cubes intersected without distinction, although the second from a better visual result.
last step, press ok, wait patiently and make the last choice you need, i.e. if you want to maintain, suppress or interrupt the association with the main set.
your request is met by the interruption of the connection, the other two take you behind the basic files.
armed with holy patience or take a walk in waiting for processing.

ps. : save everything before you start the task, you may need to stop the processing process with dramatic consequences and loss of what you have done and not saved.

Good morning, excuse the intrusion, really great explanation. But I would have the following question: at the list level parts only appear to me the new derivative part or is there the possibility that appears all that is present in the assieme "father"?

 

[stefanobruno]

before you said.

 

[Il Mauri]

therefore in the phase of pogettation it is advisable to insert the derived part for questions of practicality. a finished project will be replaced with the "original" axieme so the list of parts will appear complete. Am I right?

 

[eugenesis]

. Is it not better if you use the level of detail?
automatically makes you the single simplified part, you change it to the flight with the original set and more
You don't have a distinct change...
the management of large assemblies, don't you??

 

[stefanobruno]

Therefore in the design phase it is advisable to insert the derived part for practicality issues. a finished project will be replaced with the "original" axieme so the list of parts will appear complete. Am I right?

no, ipt and iam do not replace transparently, you may have some bad surprises at the end of the design.

 

[eugenesis]

So you admit you don't know the "level of detail-part replaced"??
is from the 2010 version ...ahi ahi ahi ...

 

[stefanobruno]

. Is it not better if you use the level of detail?
automatically makes you the single simplified part, you change it to the flight with the original set and more
You don't have a distinct change...
the management of large assemblies, don't you??

I never did, maybe I'm wrong.
I have always managed to manage my large assemblies complete with all the components ( 106677 occasions and 3403 docs open in session ), clearly rationalized in subgroups.
before I answer you, by curiosity and not to end the fish, I wanted to try to do it on a very small group ( 145 occasions and 48 docs open in the session ), it is still there that trite and now I throw it down badly.

 

[eugenesis]

in fact done so is wrong!!
you have to work "bottom-up" from the bottom to the top; you do it in every subgroup, giving a unique name and then
in the general assembly you reconnect them with the command that is in the productivity tools!!
as you tried, it is not correct!

As I say, we also work with axioms of 890000 .. yes, I said eight hundred and ninety thousand occasions!!

it is also used to make cards starting from the finished machines to use in the factory layouts!!

who sells the product should also make you the course for these things!

If you manage the assemblies as you must, you can also work them with a 32-bit machine with little ram .. guaranteed!

 

[stefanobruno]

in fact done so is wrong!!

Okay, got it.
I'll try to get your information, thank you.

 

[Zac69]

. Is it not better if you use the level of detail?
automatically makes you the single simplified part, you change it to the flight with the original set and more
You don't have a distinct change...
the management of large assemblies, don't you??

For me too this is the right way. One click and you have the ipt in the main axieme, one click and you have the subaxieme.

 

[Ilario]

in fact done so is wrong!!
you have to work "bottom-up" from the bottom to the top; you do it in every subgroup, giving a unique name and then
in the general assembly you reconnect them with the command that is in the productivity tools!!
as you tried, it is not correct!

As I say, we also work with axioms of 890000 .. yes, I said eight hundred and ninety thousand occasions!!

it is also used to make cards starting from the finished machines to use in the factory layouts!!

who sells the product should also make you the course for these things!

If you manage the assemblies as you must, you can also work them with a 32-bit machine with little ram .. guaranteed!

I'm interested in this and I don't know her at all!! !
Can you explain it a little better?
in the sense, how do you start to reason to use this type of method to lighten the final axieme?

 

[Bonve]

new ipt, comes component, choose the axiemon, wait the time due, depending on the complexity of your set and the performance of the pc.
at this point, in the derived joint window, choose the lav style button. derived (read the help when you move the cursor to the icons), for your case I would say the first left, with the two cubes intersected without distinction, although the second from a better visual result.
last step, press ok, wait patiently and make the last choice you need, i.e. if you want to maintain, suppress or interrupt the association with the main set.
your request is met by the interruption of the connection, the other two take you behind the basic files.
armed with holy patience or take a walk in waiting for processing.

ps. : save everything before you start the task, you may need to stop the processing process with dramatic consequences and loss of what you have done and not saved.

That's exactly what I was looking for, thank you very much!

 

[stefanobruno]

I'm interested in this and I don't know her at all!! !

Well, if even the Ilario didn't know this way of operation, then I feel more relieved and stop scourged!

 

[Catafratto]

back time I had downloaded this pdf
http://beinginventive.typepad.com/files/inventor-deep-dive---large-assembly-instructions.pdfI was also at a presentation where a company with great experience in large (so large) assemblies in fact recommended a middle way between stefanobruno and eugenesis, that is to insert in the axieme simplified contours (which in practice are a particular case of derivative assembly) but not to do so using the levels of detail but directly inserting the generated solid: this for stability problems. i.e.: the axiemea.iam generates the simplified contour togethera_sub01.ipt, in the main axieme recommended not to use the axiemea.iam in the level of detail but to insert togethera_sub01.ipt, the separate management made it via management so that was not a problem. I'm not here to say it's the best thing, I'm talking about what I'm told by those who have direct experience about it. I currently use this hybrid and I don't feel bad, in fact using directly the replaced detail levels I had had some problem but they were the first experiments and it could have been something wrong I did. an advantage to insert .ipts is that if the main axieme is opened for consultation by multiple users there are no pastries with any open subaxis. Finally, togethera_sub01.ipt is however a level of detail replaced and therefore can be upgraded to "request", even with productivity> more replaced.

 

[Tarkus]

Well, if even the Ilario didn't know this way of operation, then I feel more relieved and stop scourged!

If that's why I didn't even know him.
@eugenesis:
It will be necessary that you enlighten us, perhaps taking the small assembly that posted stefanobruno and fitting it according to the method you described.
thanks in advance

 

[Catafratto]

I also join the request for extra indications that never enough.

 

[eugenesis]

boys, the pdf linked by catafract should be studied and venerated as the bible!!
What I said, is basically that!!
try and then tell me..

 

[eugenesis]

I try to turn this (I don't say who did it ...)