• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

copy axial tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter biancoalle
  • Start date Start date

biancoalle

Guest
Bye to all,

I am a neophyte of inventor and coming from solidworks I wondered if there is a way to quickly replicate the table mass for complex but similar axioms.
I explain: in solidworks in case of assemblies with many components whose table is long and laborious, I can save copies of the table itself and then at a later time connect them with any similar 3d assembly, and automatically the table updates all the views, the ball, the sections, the cartilians.. .
 
management --> replace model reference --> select the new model --> save immediately with the new name.

If the assemblies are well done, and I mean that we have to finish one and then get the others out of this in the least invasive way possible, then take up much of the work done, otherwise ciccia.
because the harvests are very expensive, I, during the execution of the first, often try to replace the reference.
In this way I try to check how everything behaves and, possibly, I do not succeed in changing strategy, choosing references for the sections and views or the best details to keep the work already done.
the recovery of a table for another set requires a great order, excellent knowledge of the program and a good dose of :cool:colu:cool:, especially this last one.

I am curious to know if sw is more tolerant in this activity.
 
management --> replace model reference --> select the new model --> save immediately with the new name.

If the assemblies are well done, and I mean that we have to finish one and then get the others out of this in the least invasive way possible, then take up much of the work done, otherwise ciccia.
because the harvests are very expensive, I, during the execution of the first, often try to replace the reference.
In this way I try to check how everything behaves and, possibly, I do not succeed in changing strategy, choosing references for the sections and views or the best details to keep the work already done.
the recovery of a table for another set requires a great order, excellent knowledge of the program and a good dose of :cool:colu:cool:, especially this last one.

I am curious to know if sw is more tolerant in this activity.
Try it, it works.

for now the result seems similar to that of solidworks, to me it seems easier in sw the subsequent adaptation of things to settle but surely it is my problem, not software... Then I'll tell you.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top