cost profiles in part files

[Stefano Mombelli]

Good morning, guys.
I wanted to ask a suggestion about how to manage the cost of the tubular (and any profile) directly in the part files. I can add the cost to mm in the properties but I can't use the total length data to perform the calculation of the total cost.
I can do the calculation in the table of the separate materials but not in that of the separate cut because bound to the parameters of the file part.
I attach the files used including profiles and an explanatory image where I would like the part file to be automatically compiled.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

add equation f*c

 

[Stefano Mombelli]

add equation f*c

I didn't know where to add it and how...

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

insert a new column, select the cell and do the equation.
that on the distinct materials like you created it? What does the initial {2} of equation mean?

 

[Stefano Mombelli]

insert a new column, select the cell and do the equation.
that on the distinct materials like you created it? What does the initial {2} of equation mean?

I wanted to make sure that the result is in the part file and that the 2d is a consequence.
the "2" between the scratches serves to approximate the value to the 2nd digit after the comma

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

i.e. you want that in the side file there is a property in the separate cut with the cost of the profile?
Do you want it for each single section of profile or total length of the profile type?
Why don't you add the column as you did for the distinct materials?

 

[Stefano Mombelli]

i.e. you want that in the side file there is a property in the separate cut with the cost of the profile?
Do you want it for each single section of profile or total length of the profile type?
Why don't you add the column as you did for the distinct materials?

1. Yes.
2. the maximum would be the sum of the cost of the individual traits but I do not think it is feasible
3. because I use another template for the complete machine material

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

. because I use another template for the complete machine material

Can't you create a separate cut template?

 

[Stefano Mombelli]

Can't you create a separate cut template?

use but is bound to the part and less free file than that of separate materials where equations are kept unlike this

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the use but is bound to the part file

obvious, the cut-off only works with the part file because the cut-off can only be created within the file part by activating the module (I don't have any other way to call it) welds

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

in profile properties insert a global variable in which you calculate the price by dividing the total weight by the meter and multiplying it by the price per meter
(kgtot/kgm)

 

[Stefano Mombelli]

I can't "weight" the value of the cost to the mt to equatize it

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I wrote to insert a global variabile. the lumen values from the properties of the file.
the global variable then will be recoverable in the file properties

the kilo/m and cost/mm parameters must be content in the file properties. if you do not use configured profiles deletes fields in the file property configuration tab otherwise you risk making confusion

 

[Stefano Mombelli]

I wrote to insert a global variabile. the lumen values from the properties of the file.
the global variable then will be recoverable in the file properties

I tried to insert it but it doesn't take it... the first tab where the name fits.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I edited the previous post

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I'm testing and there are difficulties.
in the profile everything works while in the part in the cut list the euro item does not return the correct value, but a string.
this probably because the equation works within the profile, but not externally.
The thing is not trivial

 

[Stefano Mombelli]

I'm testing and there are difficulties.
in the profile everything works while in the part in the cut list the euro item does not return the correct value, but a string.
this probably because the equation works within the profile, but not externally.
The thing is not trivial

That's the problem I've found myself. However, you gave me some important ideas.
thank you very much, as usual a guarantee of quality having you in the forum.!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

something I managed to get it, but it is very limiting, not to say useless. can be just useful to draw inspiration.
in practice, taking the cue from this debate, in the profile I added a line of construction led by an equation that refers to the calculation already reported total/weight peos to the kilo/€ to the kilo.
the limit is that I can't specify that you have to read the weight of that object and then read the total weight of the part. this means that if in the part besides the profile you have other elements the result is wrong.

 

[Stefano Mombelli]

something I managed to get it, but it is very limiting, not to say useless. can be just useful to draw inspiration.
in practice, taking the cue from this debate, in the profile I added a line of construction led by an equation that refers to the calculation already reported total/weight peos to the kilo/€ to the kilo.
the limit is that I can't specify that you have to read the weight of that object and then read the total weight of the part. this means that if in the part besides the profile you have other elements the result is wrong.

thanks to the help always new experience. We'll see if something comes to mind. .

 

[TINO]

Sorry, I for a distinct piping, generated by a set, I wandered the problem by saving the table in excel, then importing it into access. I clean them, fix them and get all the desired results, to create a distinct requirement for my group.