coupling

[dicifa]

Hello, girl.
I need you...

when constraint 2 details in a set I must every time select the symbol of the quota in the dialogue or in the menu to give the distance... is there no possibility to bind details and find me already with the possibility to change the distance without going to select the symbol of the quota?

Unfortunately I just passed by inventor and I find myself a bit in trouble....

Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

No. the program from the most logical bond according to the selected entities. between faces will give coincidence, between concentric diameters, between a plane and two symmetric faces. distance and angle not by default.
I have never used inventor, but for any program I think it is worth the speech to learn to reason with the new rather than try to adapt the new to the reasoning of the old.

 

[dicifa]

No. the program from the most logical bond according to the selected entities. between faces will give coincidence, between concentric diameters, between a plane and two symmetric faces. distance and angle not by default.
I have never used inventor, but for any program I think it is worth the speech to learn to reason with the new rather than try to adapt the new to the reasoning of the old.

It is right what you say, but coming from another program and not knowing the new one is normal to try to understand if the new one can do the same things of the other...but I think it is normal for everyone...the first thing you do is see if the commands can be equal or just how they are set.

for what I ask you....

 

[nazz]

Hello, girl.
I need you...

when constraint 2 details in a set I must every time select the symbol of the quota in the dialogue or in the menu to give the distance... is there no possibility to bind details and find me already with the possibility to change the distance without going to select the symbol of the quota?

Unfortunately I just passed by inventor and I find myself a bit in trouble....

Thank you.

I have not quite understood what you mean, when mating parts in a set asks you to select faces, edges and various things, and he automatically gives you the bond that is supposed to be the right one, but if you want to set them a different bond or set the distances simply enough that you change the type of bond... But I don't know what I was asking.

try to put a snapshot of what you try to do, so it is easier to understand the problem

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

It seems quite clear to me the question.
17pha wants that in automatic the basic proposed coupling is the distance.
probably use to place the elements in this way, which among other things in the design and development phase can become mandatory; then change the choice every time becomes not so expensive in terms of time, but frustrating. You get a hundred. . .

 

[nazz]

Now that I read it more carefully I realized what he was asking... In fact the automatic deduction of the constraint cannot be set by default, I tried to dismantle in the options.
the only thing you could do if they are many equal pieces that are to be paired is to use the copy command with couplings, would immediately give you the possibility to put the same constraints on the new pieces by setting the desired distances immediately

 

[dicifa]

It seems quite clear to me the question.
17pha wants that in automatic the basic proposed coupling is the distance.
probably use to place the elements in this way, which among other things in the design and development phase can become mandatory; then change the choice every time becomes not so expensive in terms of time, but frustrating. You get a hundred. . .

exact mass, it was to save time.. .

Now that I read it more carefully I realized what he was asking... In fact the automatic deduction of the constraint cannot be set by default, I tried to dismantle in the options.
the only thing you could do if they are many equal pieces that are to be paired is to use the copy command with couplings, would immediately give you the possibility to put the same constraints on the new pieces by setting the desired distances immediately

Thanks to you too, I didn't know you could do that.


However slowly we are moving to solidworks and leaving inventor and I am very well...it is just a matter of habit!