create a part from a set... .

[ixx]

Hello, girl.
Does anyone know if there is a solid works command that gives the possibility to make a solid part a set of a piece and then be able to feed it to a cam?
I'll explain better.
If I make a set consisting of two or more parts, then I do not have the opportunity to work the assembling with a cam, or better it is possible but very slender because it does not recognize all the edges the points, the guidelines etc.
It works very well if I have a unique solid.
in thin3 there is a command called "solid implodes"; Is there something like that in solid works?

Hello and thank you all!

 

[Ivan1990]

Hello, girl.
Does anyone know if there is a solid works command that gives the possibility to make a solid part a set of a piece and then be able to feed it to a cam?
I'll explain better.
If I make a set consisting of two or more parts, then I do not have the opportunity to work the assembling with a cam, or better it is possible but very slender because it does not recognize all the edges the points, the guidelines etc.
It works very well if I have a unique solid.
in thin3 there is a command called "solid implodes"; Is there something like that in solid works?

Hello and thank you all!

If I have understood well enough that you save by name, and under the place to save it as you save it together in part format.

 

[controllofiamma]

or carry out in igs

 

[Onda]

you can save by name and choose the part format. at that point you save a part that contains all the other parts, like making a parasolid export and then an import.
But then you have to open the new part and make a boolean between the various solids, so as to eliminate intersecting surfaces.
to do the boolean you have to use the matching command.
In this way you create a single solid, which can then be worked.
wave

 

[re_solidworks]

or you can insert a blank part into the axieme, go in contextual modification of this part and use the conjunct command to make the boolean of the other parts inside this new.

you understand something

If not I try again....with my words!

 

[Onda]

it seems more correct, so it keeps the parameters of the compound part
wave

 

[ixx]

Thanks raga for the advice, I tried all the solutions, they are all ok, however the solution of re_solidworks to me is the one that goes best because it keeps the parameterity of the composed part! !
thanks to all problem solved! ! ! !