Mike1967
Guest
My mom... wrong courier....:redface:
gliel' ho
I got it.I studied nasa (to read on the contrary)
gliel' ho
I got it.I studied nasa (to read on the contrary)
Mike1967
Guest
In fact, perhaps it is a little more laborious but regarding precision it is unbeatable.
I attach an image to show you a "defect" that happens with structural elements... And if you're a man who's even in the workbench, you know what I mean (if you ask me... I and the counter... We went to school together:biggrin
.Attachments
roccolaser
Guest
Mike1967
Guest
Did you do that?? :biggrin:
Attachments
roccolaser
Guest
to tell the truth no mike....:biggrin:
Mike1967
Guest
... moreover, I strongly doubt that when you can click on the second line do not make you of the case... the lines are too disproportionate, they are too short to allow the whole diameter to join.
respects the proportions when drawings saw you fall apart from the beginning.
Mike1967
Guest
I'm coming to your house. So I'll compliment you in person... :biggrin:
I don't like myself... (johnny stecchino)
[youtube]_cxwo2gdme[/youtube]
roccolaser
Guest
Mike1967
Guest
Minkia... If after all I'm sorry, I'm telling you, it's not good. I must be a great b......:biggrin::biggrin:Here I am now. Then you say you don't want to do that....?
depends on the precision you want to achieve.
as I have already written that method is not the maximum because in the inner part of the corner there is a lack of support material that makes the welding "draw" by sending to merit the angular precision.
consider that on a ø 100 with inclination of 30° I have an air of 0.6° equal to more than one mm (if you look at the attachment in other post you understand) then on 3 welds, as in your example, you would have a curve that will be around the 92° + welding withdrawal. . above 95° (closed curve), guaranteed.
If you want to overcome in part, you have to molar the ends so as to make the edges parallel.
I don't know if you're handy assembly at the counter, in case you ask your colleagues to complain and you'll see they'll tell you the same thing.
now you go to sleep, after 9 hours of work and 40 km of bike... - What? .
Noche.
ps: I would keep the joints to be soldered towards the inside, there is less to be soldered. (Now let's see if you can turn...) hihihhi
roccolaser
Guest
night mike thanks always of all the help you give me....
Mike1967
Guest
of nothing (in pm I give you the coordinates of my account... :biggrin
..to improve the curve you made you can fix those joints
making an extruded cut with the normal cut option.logically one body at a time and only after having turned them into sheet metal.Here's how it looks:
Attachments
Last edited:
roccolaser
Guest
hi mike take a look at this attachment I noticed that there is another problem...with the structural element.....
Mike1967
Guest
from this moment I will not respond more actively to your posts if you will not put into practice what established in the short past to video and post explanatory.hi mike take a look at this attachment I noticed that there is another problem...with the structural element.....
do not think that it does not cost labor and time, a bit of commitment and respect for the aid received is the currency of exchange, if this is not also the spirit of generosity towards others comes to fail.
I ask you, but why do you dare to put grades (0.1°)???? ? ? ?
Have you tried to change that quota? no? here, do it and you will see what surprises!
also how can you expect to learn if what is explained in a post you lose it on the street?? ?
the vertical relationship, I don't want to see it anymore, if I see it means that that sketch is not symmetrical!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is a basic thing if you do not want to tribulate with the continuation of subsequent work.
Moreover: the attached image does not make me understand from which angle it has been recovered, a macro zoom is to be combined with a global zoom if not really it takes the glass ball... but it is not so much for the glass but for the size that must have!
open your file, delete everything, remake the welding profile as you must and then if it will be all as a rule of art we will talk about it.
Hi.
ps: if you still have that doubt, I'll tell you: yes, I'm angry!
ps2: I apologize to those who will read my post out of my usual tone, I wanted to use erudite terms in use in the worst workshops of canton ticino.. :
ps3: moderator note: please keep the discussion at civilian levels.
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
roccolaser
Guest
mike you have all the reasons of the world, but I started from scratch with solidworks without bases I read something but nothing particular so sometimes the things you say I don't understand them well it takes me time, then sti degrees you talk, I don't understand how I have to do it I see doing it in some video on youtube...
I'd like to do it myself, but if I don't understand how it is done, I can't build it. . .
I'd like to do it myself, but if I don't understand how it is done, I can't build it. . .
re_solidworks
Guest
a long time ago I had written a guide on the creation of the welding sections. try doing a search in the forum, you should find my instructions step by step.
I recommend to all friendly and civil tones.
Mike1967
Guest
No. download the attachment and examine it carefully, spend the night.
. I figured it out. But he realized it was a rash... I'm sure, I had to shake him.
in any way I ask vein... :redface:
roccolaser
Guest
ok mike I will examine it carefully I promise, if there is something that is not clear to me I will let you know,... thank you again...:smile:
roccolaser
Guest
Good morning mike, I did everything again I hope you don't get angry though, if I send you the attachment... :biggrin:
Mike1967
Guest
roccolaser
Guest
I could even turn it, even if my worker tells me that it is better for him... weld it in a horizontal welder. ..however thanks always mike...