• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

create video dvd zerissimo level

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEF888
  • Start date Start date

STEF888

Guest
hi I am new to this forum, and I would like to learn the soft. creo ex pro/e - I would like to know if besides the help online ptc "uny" there are dvd or video that explain the basics also the English language, or someone can give me some private lesson - zone roma. I would need some hours with someone in web link or tutorial with person, to learn the basics... now I can't do anything. I already have experience of other surfacing software but not basic parametric/engineering as I create. so I find it a little ostico, even if they are clear the enormous potential... the purpose would be cmq of industrial design since it now also enjoys a good freeform module, which could help me.
the sector in which work is of design of vehicles and products - I mostly take care of advance design therefore save small objects, I never do engineering objects, collaborating with competent people in this field. but although they are great professionals, they are not prodigal of advice. - Maybe professional jealousy? Maybe... cmq while I understand the choice not to divide your knowledge with others, I do not share it perhaps because I teach too;) cmq if any of those who know this program would want to contact me I would be happy to evaluate how to collaborate.
thanks for any info support
Hello
 
Hi.

waiting for a course, which is the best solution to save time and money, you can start following the pro-e driving exercises:
guide > help center > quick links > exercises

give us an eye, they are not hurt, many of us have left from there.
 
Hi.

waiting for a course, which is the best solution to save time and money, you can start following the pro-e driving exercises:
guide > help center > quick links > exercises

give us an eye, they are not hurt, many of us have left from there.
Thank you so much,
I'm trying to figure out a few things...a lot of anxiety and I'm going through everything but it's tough. For example: how do I personalize the interface? I set the mm as a unit now, but as a color change to the back ground - I have a problem to the optical nerve and I have to work not with white but with other color scales. then, can you have a grid and set its distances and colors? I realized that it is not possible to have 4 views (top,side,front, 3/4) (so they tell me... )
you can not know with a double click, click on the plan on which I want to work without re-passing for "nominal views" that seems to me a waste of clicks? ;)
how active or disable snaps?
I know that they are dumb questions but it seems to me a program that has a huge potential but also a lot to do in simplification.
then... last for today!!
how do I customize the tools - starting to put together the ones I use most in a new tab? I am following the tuts of the prof of the noble (pro/e) and I try to adapt them to creo because they are well done but I will be dumb but always happens the passage in which things go wrong ehehhe
I hope you or others can answer the questions above and I hope ptc will make a more easy and intuitive config to handle.
amen and thanks
 
I'm going through everything, but it's tough. For example: how do I personalize the interface? I set the mm as a unit now, but as a color change to the back ground - I have a problem to the optical nerve and I have to work not with white but with other color scales. then, can you have a grid and set its distances and colors? I realized that it is not possible to have 4 views (top,side,front, 3/4) (so they tell me... )
you can not know with a double click, click on the plan on which I want to work without re-passing for "nominal views" that seems to me a waste of clicks? ;)
how active or disable snaps?
I know that they are dumb questions but it seems to me a program that has a huge potential but also a lot to do in simplification.
then... last for today!!
how do I customize the tools - starting to put together the ones I use most in a new tab? I am following the tuts of the prof of the noble (pro/e) and I try to adapt them to creo because they are well done but I will be dumb but always happens the passage in which things go wrong ehehhe
I hope you or others can answer the questions above and I hope ptc will make a more easy and intuitive config to handle.
amen and thanks
Bye!

In the meantime, I have to say, dani! !

and I add that for all your doubts, I think you find many answers on the online guide (see image).
could (conditional of obligation) be misleading to follow a guide for proes trying to learn create: they have changed a lot at the interface level and position of some commands. . .

for all other requests, I can tell you that it is not said that there is everything you are used to using in other cad: but it is a matter of habit.
but what I can absolutely contradict you, is the request for a more easy and intuitive configuration. Once you enter the configuration editor page (the old config.pro), you can decide how to behave the software. I find it very easy, very intuitive, and especially very stable. Not to mention that if you have to work on another pc, cover your config on the new machine, and you have your own personal configuration.
other thing I like to die: the config is editable with a notepad....if you know what to do (variable, macro....) enter to create "spento", edit what you want, save and the game is done.

I have changed 3-4 cads since I approached this world, everyone has pros and cons (you can read many debates, more or less lit on the forum), but the difference, always makes the handle... .

Good job!
 

Attachments

  • help creo.webp
    help creo.webp
    116.8 KB · Views: 18
stef another thing, in your profile specify the version of pro-e you use, to better target the answers.
 
thank you guys all - for support... In fact the handle in this program will take time to build it;) for the config. I read in other discussions indicated to me by dani that while personalising it someone found difficulty in loading if on that pc several people worked there, even if they had experience in previous versions of the soft. cmq is clear that everyone to his tastes, and I will try to enter the head of the prog.

but the search for personalizations is fundamental because cmq if you come from other solidworks. Rhino. alias you have a way of working that is structured and that in part you would like to try again in the new prog. to save you time and maintain automatism.

but we will try to blow it and learn. true is that the interface can be simplified - because if in so many post the same questions for years obviously father create could simplify things a bit.
I find those videos well explained even if I hang in some passage. . .

If cmq you know a good Samaritan who at a reasonable price give me some lessons on roma or I don't know how on the web let me know. . .disposed to evaluate. clear I do not claim free but I will evaluate according to my pockets; )
thanks cmq for the support.
stew
 
before trying to change the interface of pro-e make an effort and try to adapt, it is a bit spartan and without frills, but if you get used it is not bad.

If cmq you know a good Samaritan who at a reasonable price give me some lessons on roma or I don't know how on the web let me know. . .disposed to evaluate. clear I do not claim free but I will evaluate according to my pockets; )
thanks cmq for the support.
stew
in the area of roma there is this course:http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?38465-corsi-cad-cae-cam-finanziati-regione-lazioIt's a little late. See you. or try to contact prof
 
Thank you so much. I know and my "prof" gave the contacts. I tried to write to him but I did not get answer;( email remained unsuccessful. Maybe he left and they have work to do or did not come - I will try again. Clearly an official course has a cost and maybe releases a certificate, I would be happy if one of the teachers of the course or a good one would teach me lessons. I would pay you... I believe that of the "repetitions" in this case "initiations" eheheh would be necessary - also because I am not 20 years old I can not "lose" time 20 hours a day to make a cranked cube.I have to produce;) and given the crisis the will to learn this softw. It's just that, but I'm not 10 years old for the DIY. I must be extradited and be able to ask my stupid questions. then adjusted the seat and the mirrors, understood how to turn the car on and put the reverse go alone... I forgot the lights!! eheh cmq thanks to the bang you do to give me a hand. Thank you.
 
Hello, stef, I'm learning I create myself. I've never had the chance to lecture with teacher, but I found it useful enoughe-learning of the ptc. this includes video-courses with adjoining practical exercises that guide you at first to move the first steps. of course complete packages are paid, there are also courses for 40 hours each! in practice they have the advantage that they explain everything to you, but they have the defect that they do not deepen enough according to me. I am useful to get a general idea at first and start working, then to deepen what I need I have to bang myself and search for guidance or forum for example.
are made altogether very well, a small free taste you can find qui. if you go to the top bar and change your English language clearly you will find more.
 
Hello stef888
we "know" already and I see with pleasure that you followed my advice to enroll.
you will immediately realize that the forum is fortunately rich in highly prepared people and available to help.
I started using creo2.0 about a year ago and after a short course of a week, I did as calacc, "self-dictism" and will.
certainly creo does not have a friendly approach however...

@stef888 excuses if I haven't been able to write you lately but I have some difficulties that I hope will settle soon.
Hi.
 
Hello stef888
we "know" already and I see with pleasure that you followed my advice to enroll.
you will immediately realize that the forum is fortunately rich in highly prepared people and available to help.
I started using creo2.0 about a year ago and after a short course of a week, I did as calacc, "self-dictism" and will.
certainly creo does not have a friendly approach however...

@stef888 excuses if I haven't been able to write you lately but I have some difficulties that I hope will settle soon.
Hi.
Hello exatem,
do not apologize (before all hello to you;)) you were among the first to answer me, and I think that has a value. thanks again for the advice... In fact I think the interface the menu is a little ostico but reading forums on the world web it is worthwhile that in many find astico the interface and some "burocratic" over... the potential as mentioned already do not discuss but the usability is tough to digest. And that's tough. I don't understand how much god can be wasted with some questionable choices. true that it is a mix of various programs but has not yet taken the best of everything or even of the competitions - also looking at the middle.range programs that I think can for usability teach so much. Sometimes it seems like some programs have to stay complicated and that you have to go over 5 years before you understand them and exploit them... I think it's different today. a little like having a gp motion with the traction counterll or the old 500cc that if they were crumbling in acceleration broke your wrists, see the history of capirossi for example. - true to be hard and pure but today I think if ptc sees for example how autodesk designed a simple interface in a program just born as fusion 360, you could access the different plans with a direct click etc... cmq thanks for everything - it will take me some time that "I have but I don't have..." and that week with someone who knows how to better understand how the story works;) I read very intense clashes on the interface of nx vs I create...
the parameters of this generation are still complicated and therefore need a certain process to make the rog/pc understand what it has to do and how to behave. So my criticism is constructive. . because the prog is powerful. we hope to handle it but not in 3 years.
By the way, how active or disable snaps? eheheh as would say verdone: I miss the basics... Hey.
abracc and respect
 
In fact I think the interface the menu is a little ostico but reading forums on the world web it is worthwhile that in many find astico the interface and some "burocratic" over... the potential as mentioned already do not discuss but the usability is tough to digest. And that's tough. I don't understand how much god can be wasted with some questionable choices. true that it is a mix of various programs but has not yet taken the best of everything or even of the competitions - also looking at the middle.range programs that I think can for usability teach so much. Sometimes it seems like some programs have to stay complicated and that you have to go over 5 years before you understand them and exploit them... I think it's different today.
Okay, we're just saying it's a tough program, but some talk about the complicated interface, the over-respect and the usability for me is totally inappropriate.
today as today I create parametric has put on a interface so amazing that it makes you want to work to press all the colorful icons (which among other things take away more to the level of graphic performance). I'm convinced that if I did a class of mechanics in a high school or in a professional school using the new creo they would learn to make models in four and eight with all those "semanettoni" that are there!
regarding the menu I would not say that it is ostico but that it is simply logical, and set as it is allows you to do much more at modeling level using half of the features than the mid-range, with the consequence of being able to obtain lighter and manageable models more easily.
Are you talking about over-clicking bureaucrats? do you know that the central key exists in pro/e? that you can confirm every feature with that there!?? Try to see if with solidworks you can for example... You can't do it because there's no central key, I've already tried! you have to move your beautiful cursor to the colorful green v and confirm it. This is inefficiency unfortunately, what if you say so! but an average cad user does not think about it, because it is invaded by the colorful icon in the background that is beautiful. a little like children who hypnotize themselves with the special effects of cartoons.
from up there, before shooting too rash judgments we really try to reason by advanced users. things before judging them you have to know them well.
 
Hello, stef.
This discussion, like so many others that have happened over the years in this forum, which contain criticism to the pro-e interface, leave the time they find, can be a rash, but do not solve the problem, I do not think ptc makes you a program ad oc. so try to be flexible, and be you to adapt to a high-end program. I have also worked with other programs and each one has merits and defects, there is no perfect cad.
before losing time to personalizations, accept it as it shows up, learn it well and then you can try to make targeted improvements.
 
Hello, stef.
This discussion, like so many others that have happened over the years in this forum, which contain criticism to the pro-e interface, leave the time they find, can be a rash, but do not solve the problem, I do not think ptc makes you a program ad oc. so try to be flexible, and be you to adapt to a high-end program. I have also worked with other programs and each one has merits and defects, there is no perfect cad.
before losing time to personalizations, accept it as it shows up, learn it well and then you can try to make targeted improvements.
Hello, dan.
thanks to the intervention - this last one of mine, was in fact more a vent, that I will repeat for every new user, in different forms, than to ask info on the tools.
I answer to you but indirectly to others... It is clear that as a neophyte it is my limit, but that ptc can do more to make usable the interface is not only right, but should be part of the philosophy of a company - listen to different needs and draw a synthesis. Clearly I did not expect to find on this forum, the senior manager of the ptc who asked me how I wanted the program;) but surely they can do so much. as the criticisms are always constructive if done politely and respectfully - as said I will put myself low head to learn it even if some jobs if they enter will make me have less time.
Hello
 
... but that ptc can do more to make the interface accessible not only is right, but should be part of the philosophy of a company ...
Surely at the ptc know what to do, I don't think they're missing, they're probably looking for continuity with the past at the expense of new users, if from one version to another, suddenly changing all the menus, even to make them more user friendly, I don't think that the thousands of users who have been using pro-and for years will be happy.
I have already changed 3 versions of pro-e and the adaptation was immediate.
 
Surely at the ptc know what to do, I don't think they're missing, they're probably looking for continuity with the past at the expense of new users, if from one version to another, suddenly changing all the menus, even to make them more user friendly, I don't think that the thousands of users who have been using pro-and for years will be happy.
I have already changed 3 versions of pro-e and the adaptation was immediate.
Hi, dani,
I don't agree. I explain - I think they have changed a lot, but I think that so much can be done in terms of usability (not in terms of quantity) the introduction of freeform modules means an openness to other worlds, which are not the narrow ones of engineering. This does not mean that you have to change everything, but it is not possible that even experts should ask how to make a config of their interface as and where to change colors without resorting to the "notepad". He doesn't take anything from anyone. I also use c4d and rhino but if tomorrow the maxon makes the management of 3d animations easier I think it is good for everyone. otherwise it seems, that I must maintain my know-how acquired in 12 years of frustration, while new users will have the cake served. (relative concept according to tech advance;))) I believe that the version of pro/e v1 has improved also thanks to substantial changes not of quantity... everything will be easier epr you and for the new.
Hello
 
Hi calacc,
I believe from the fervour with which you write that you are a real fan of creo.bello. I believe with experience that I can say, that you defend the program in an egregious way, but I do not think so many others to question the program, because many criticisms in the forums come from people who use it or used it in previous versions (not other names that only marketing can invent;)). on the potential of which I am interested, there is no doubt why I chose it.
but of a product should be evaluated not only the experience treated by those who work from a lot in specific areas but also of those who have no experience with that object/programme. also because the program with some new triggers you want to open to other uses and ways to use/users. therefore also other logics. for me the interface, sitting in front of the pc, but also following the video tutorials or reading of other professionals also on forums in use, it is not clear and " simply logical" (citing) as it is for you. - I add that many wf users did not find some tools, renamed or moved, so there are problems.
Clearly, if I have to wait for 5 years of learning, I think it's useless. If I put you in front of the site of the Lazio region and cannot navigate (and like you many others) like the employee who has been working for us for 12 years, I don't think you should not consider your opinion (as a user), I think the improvements arise from comparison. if you look at the words of john buchowski vp product management. He says that and I think they will continue to change even in creo3... also thanks to the suggestions of all, old new users -
Hi.
 
I don't agree. . .
I'm sorry, but mene will do a reason. :biggrin:
However, too often it is more important to form than to substance. the input data that serve a cad system are always the same: points, lines, quotas, texts etc. .. given in one way or another, I don't find much difference.
What I'm interested in is the push parameterization, the management of big projects is so many other things that not all cads have.
 
regarding the menu I would not say that it is ostic but that it is simply logical, and set as it is allows you to do much more at modeling level using half the features compared to mid-range, with the consequence of achieving lighter and more manageable models more easily.
bum!!! I propose this for the best shot of 2013:tongue:
Are you talking about over-clicking bureaucrats? do you know that the central key exists in pro/e? that you can confirm every feature with that there!?? Try to see if with solidworks you can for example... You can't do it because there's no central key, I've already tried! you have to move your beautiful cursor to the colorful green v and confirm it. This is inefficiency unfortunately, what if you say so!
this instead the candid of the official as best shot valid also for 2014!
from calacc, that you must have tried badly obstinately to click on the wrong mouse button. try with solidworks instead to press the right button on any element you have under the cursor (model, tree feature, menu, graphic elements etc.) and you will see that, you will open a way that until now you totally ignored.
as to the confirmation of the commands with swx, when confirming, the mouse icon is attached to the pointer with the right key highlighted; just click with the right and confirm it without even looking where you click.
the central key... but rotlf!
from up there, before shooting too rash judgments we really try to reason by advanced users. things before judging them you have to know them well.
Right. . .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top