created directly and created parametric

[maxopus]

I open a survey, because someone asked me if it is not the case of grouping under a single macroarea that of software osd (now I create direct) and pro/e (now I create parametric).

It is clear that the two groups will remain distinct within the macroarea.

 

[Trotto@81]

I can't vote because I don't know what bouquet they are and see the video of the ptc I understood even less, because they say it's not a simple rename, but a completely new program.

 

[Matteo]

According to me I create 1.0 direct or parametric should be in the same section, while I create elements direct (osd) could remain to itself (the name creates confusion, but it is something different from creo 1.0 direct and is still on sale).

creo 1.0 direct is not osd, it is rewritten from zero
creo elements direct coincides with osd

 

[MBT]

I believe that to someone will come a syncope and a grip of the wheelchair to the view of osd together with pro/e ....

 

[Matteo]

I believe that to someone will come a syncope and a grip of the wheelchair to the view of osd together with pro/e ....

ma osd (alias "I create direct elements" will never be "set" to proe (not even on the forum:smile... will remain alive a few years (I believe without substantial developments) until they harden the ex osd customers to migrate to the integrated environment I create 1.0 param + direct where the module "direct" will be a code that nothing will have to do with osd, me10 etc etc...

 

[maxopus]

creo direct 1.0 already has the granite kernel.
in fact the file format became that of pro/e prt.1 ... etc.
It will be a challenge to exchange files with the president as if you had the same cad.

those indicated (rear element direct and parametric) are versions of passage destined to obsolescence also for their very short presence on the market (lasted a few months).

 

[Matteo]

creo direct 1.0 already has the granite kernel.
in fact the file format became that of pro/e prt.1 ... etc.
It will be a challenge to exchange files with the president as if you had the same cad.

those indicated (rear element direct and parametric) are versions of passage destined to obsolescence also for their very short presence on the market (lasted a few months).

creo elements direct (osd) I think it will have a long transition...

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

creo elements direct (osd) I think it will have a long transition...

you quoto...:redface

I give you a maximum advice, to avoid confusion to users.
create a macro category called creo:
instead of having modeling parts, configuration,lamiera,ass,ecc..
I would only do the part:
parametric (ex proe)
direct (which is not ex osd)
to which will be added
layout (the 2d integrated to 2)

The fem part of pro/mechanica is now called a simulated creo.

greetings

 

[Matteo]

The fem part of pro/mechanica is now called a simulated creo.

I got it!
By the way: but do you create simulate is something different from creo analyst? I don't remember where I read this name.

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

I got it!
By the way: but do you create simulate is something different from creo analyst? I don't remember where I read this name.

creo analyst is a package consisting of:

- creo direct
- simulated creo (ex pro/mechnica)
- creo advanced simulation extension (ex advanced mechanica)

These packages have been created for role, let's just say what it would do for you.:smile:

 

[Matteo]

creo analyst is a package consisting of:

- creo direct
- simulated creo (ex pro/mechnica)
- creo advanced simulation extension (ex advanced mechanica)

These packages have been created for role, let's just say what it would do for you.:smile:

Exactly. You know how excited I am about promechanica:finger:

 

[Er Presidente]

ma creo elements and enough, cosa e'?

 

[Er Presidente]

I open a survey, because someone asked me if it is not the case of grouping under a single macroarea that of software osd (now I create direct) and pro/e (now I create parametric).

It is clear that the two groups will remain distinct within the macroarea.

put us somewhere "ex cocreate" etc.

 

[cacciatorino]

only as a point, this is how the "cugini" of www.cad.de:
http://ww3.cad.de/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimate.cgi?action=intro&category=18&mystyle=

 

[maxopus]

Good hunting, it's not bad as a solution.
We'll take care of it.