creation wizard holes in tops

[Tantocattivo]

Hello.
Obviously after searching in the forum using screw, thread, hole, drilling, I found nothing useful and so I ask.
I have to make holes in the field together and I should practically combine a structure of a locker made with the structural members and a sheet that covers them. what I would like to do is a 7 mm hole in the sheet (one part) and a threaded hole m6 in the structural member (another part).
Let us say that I could solve the problem by providing the sheet (7mm) in part, and then make concentric holes (6mm) in the field together in the structural member.

Thank you in advance.

 

[Mike1967]

Hello.
Obviously after searching in the forum using screw, thread, hole, drilling, I found nothing useful and so I ask.
I have to make holes in the field together and I should practically combine a structure of a locker made with the structural members and a sheet that covers them. what I would like to do is a 7 mm hole in the sheet (one part) and a threaded hole m6 in the structural member (another part).
Let us say that I could solve the problem by providing the sheet (7mm) in part, and then make concentric holes (6mm) in the field together in the structural member.

Thank you in advance.

in the environment together you can use the "hole series" function that allows you to choose the types of holes to perform.
I personally prefer the system you thought.

I almost forgot... Hello compaesano... :smile:

 

[Tantocattivo]

I have difficulty "say" to drill the sheet of 7 mm and make a threaded hole m6 in the structural member, what kind of hole do I have to choose? do you prefer to use the method that I said because it is lighter or why better controllable?
then I would like to put the screws of the toolbox as well, so much the design is not big, the more necessary I want to do it because it seems more beautiful (which sometimes is a necessity).

 

[Mike1967]

I have difficulty "say" to drill the sheet of 7 mm and make a threaded hole m6 in the structural member, what kind of hole do I have to choose? do you prefer to use the method that I said because it is lighter or why better controllable?
then I would like to put the screws of the toolbox as well, so much the design is not big, the more necessary I want to do it because it seems more beautiful (which sometimes is a necessity).

Do you use 2011 or 2010??

 

[Tantocattivo]

use the 2010 version

 

[Mike1967]

use the 2010 version

Okay, then I see if I can get a proper file and I'll put it, by the way, read la guide, she's exhaustive.
even you can choose the screw for mating.
I repeat, I do it "hand", but if you learn it is convenient also this system (hole series).

Hi.

 

[Mike1967]

I couldn't put the screws because of a little messed up installation, it's a mule
That pc...

 

[Tantocattivo]

Thank you.
I saw and clenched your holes (very bad to say I know) .
but I figured out where I was wrong, as far as driving, I read it but actually I find the guide not very practical or complete, surely it will be my brain that is reluctant to changes!
cmq now I try in my design!

Hi.

 

[Tantocattivo]

Mah! I will not be practical, but it seems to me that there is some bugs in the file you sent me!.
I go to the hole "crew hole m6-1" and not to make the threaded hole that passes all the part I try to change the drop down menu "conical puncture" where I put offset from the surface (see attachment) as soon as I get out of the change function I see that I did not get the result that I wanted and then return to the change function, I try to put everything as an erea before (I also did the print screen) but I can no longer get back to the initial condition.

 

[Mike1967]

Mah! I will not be practical, but it seems to me that there is some bugs in the file you sent me!.
I go to the hole "crew hole m6-1" and not to make the threaded hole that passes all the part I try to change the drop down menu "conical puncture" where I put offset from the surface (see attachment) as soon as I get out of the change function I see that I did not get the result that I wanted and then return to the change function, I try to put everything as an erea before (I also did the print screen) but I can no longer get back to the initial condition.

Okay, now you've made me come back to mind because I don't usually use that function:
in practice takes as the final component "the last body" that finds in the drilling path.
that function is "usable" only with couplings type: plate-plate.
in practice in the "echo" voice the measure you put the use for the last body that
find, what a mischief.
Now you understand why I discarded her. .

 

[Mike1967]

per capirci:

 

[Tantocattivo]

Okay, now you've made me come back to mind because I don't usually use that function:
in practice takes as the final component "the last body" that finds in the drilling path.
that function is "usable" only with couplings type: plate-plate.
in practice in the "echo" voice the measure you put the use for the last body that
find, what a mischief.
Now you understand why I discarded her. .

But is there no way to correct this? Sorry, but the other 6 million people using solidworks they do? I'm sorry, is it a kind of kiss or is there any philosophical reasoning behind it? cmq in the meantime I make hand holes in the parts and then talk about it. cmq thanks so much for your time.

 

[Mike1967]

But is there no way to correct this? Sorry, but the other 6 million people using solidworks they do? I'm sorry, is it a kind of kiss or is there any philosophical reasoning behind it? cmq in the meantime I make hand holes in the parts and then talk about it. cmq thanks so much for your time.

I hope someone more experienced than me will enlighten us, but I fear that function
for drilling between two components such as flange plates and what else
are single bodies inside a file, I hope to be wrong but...

 

[Tantocattivo]

no, but handing them is too long, ance because then I have to do them in the underlying part in the context of the axieme (the structural member).

 

[Mike1967]

no, but handing them is too long, ance because then I have to do them in the underlying part in the context of the axieme (the structural member).

You do it on the sheet and then you do it through the sketch rep.
If I get rid of the mule I put a sample.. .

 

[Tantocattivo]

I made the holes in the sheet at one by one as a fool, then I did a sketch putting only the drilling points (all in part) then went in the whole, I made a hole in the structure (structural size) and then I made repetition of the function guided by the sketch using the sheet sketch containing the points. but the thing that makes me train is that I don't think you do this, I mean, drilling and screws are an important thing in a mechanical cad, if now I have to remake some hole I have to remake almost everything. If so, sometimes I regret autocad, at least you didn't expect anything, you were resigned and did everything by hand.

 

[SolidUser]

I can't understand the problem.
I attach an image of what I would do to fix plate+ welded element.

 

[Mike1967]

I can't understand the problem.
I attach an image of what I would do to fix plate+ welded element.

Well, did it suck to make us understand where we're wrong?? :biggrin: or post the file...
I follow him so I can get what you see in the video
I went logically, but obviously slwks sometimes do not work logically.
I am based on the guide that says:select a term condition between those in the list. blind, passing, to the surface, surface offset. set other options of the term condition depending on the type of hole.


blind blind is the distance measured by the first face intersected by the axis of the hole in the last component. bohh!

illuminam... :smile:

 

[Mike1967]

Well, did it suck to make us understand where we're wrong?? :biggrin: or post the file...
I follow him so I can get what you see in the video
I went logically, but obviously slwks sometimes do not work logically.
I am based on the guide that says:select a term condition between those in the list. blind, passing, to the surface, surface offset. set other options of the term condition depending on the type of hole.


blind blind is the distance measured by the first face intersected by the axis of the hole in the last component. bohh!

illuminam... :smile:

Caxxo... I did it.... but it has no logic...
I think if I give him depth... That must take... not the surface. .
I'd like to know why...

@evil... thanks to soliduser that spronato me we solved.
Look at the video and do some evidence. :finger:

 

[Tantocattivo]

Caxxo... I did it.... but it has no logic...
I think if I give him depth... That must take... not the surface. .
I'd like to know why...

@evil... thanks to soliduser that spronato me we solved.
Look at the video and do some evidence. :finger:

thanks to your tenacity and soliduser sympathy you solved! !
cmq I remember doing tests and it didn't seem to me, I tried with offset from the supercie. cmq tomorrow when I get to work I try with the model.