• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

creo 1.0 beta

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prof.
  • Start date Start date
The_Matrix said:
then think if one of the three is ozzy... :tongue:
Click to expand...
In short, I miss you on my wedding trip, leave me alone, appoint my name in vain! shame! :-)
If one of those 3 had been ozzy, the 1500 features first of all would have been 500, because I am capable! ahahahaha
Second, I would have thought:
dick if I had the explicit indeed I should not have remembered which sketch rules the skeleton of the rib so I would not have lost minutes to look for it in the model tree and break @@ to redefine all the fittings that failed to cascade.. .
boys for changes like those the explicit will be like the cigarette after a beautiful trumpet... a beautiful trumpet obviously. :wink:
or for those who do not smoke, after a beautiful trumpet stay alone without the woman talking in the background... :-)
impagable! :smile:
 
Parametric_Ozzy said:
boys for changes like those the explicit will be like the cigarette after a beautiful trumpet... a beautiful trumpet obviously. :wink:
or for those who do not smoke, after a beautiful trumpet stay alone without the woman talking in the background... :-)
impagable! :smile:
Click to expand...
happy not to be your wife!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
:wink:
 
Parametric_Ozzy said:
In short, I miss you on my wedding trip, leave me alone, appoint my name in vain! shame! :-)
If one of those 3 had been ozzy, the 1500 features first of all would have been 500, because I am capable! ahahahaha
Second, I would have thought:
dick if I had the explicit indeed I should not have remembered which sketch rules the skeleton of the rib so I would not have lost minutes to look for it in the model tree and break @@ to redefine all the fittings that failed to cascade.. .
boys for changes like those the explicit will be like the cigarette after a beautiful trumpet... a beautiful trumpet obviously. :wink:or for those who do not smoke, after a beautiful trumpet stay alone without the woman talking in the background... :-)
pricelessSmile:
Click to expand...
you are my idol!!! :biggrin:
thanks to exist!
 
I received a message: "Is creo 1.0"... usual advertising?
I think the release will happen at the end of August, right?
 
hello to everyone, I also introduce myself, since the conversation seems very loose, but also weighted!
creo 1.0 is a bit like saying wildfire 6, to understand. only that instead of working on the optimization of classical wildfire, ptc jumped on the fusion of wildfire with tools from explicit modeling.
creo differs from st of siemens because when you pass a file through instrumentation type parametric->direct->parametric do not miss the originality parameters, which instead in st is canceled and no longer reusable, as in the old "fulmina" key in catia. This exists and works (we still don't understand how, but funcy) not simply using the same file (which then reopens in parametric no longer has a feature, and so it was "fulminate"...or "syncronized"!), but thanks to a basic technology, a structure of the data they created and that is called common data model. more, n'in so.

Moreover, and here the users of the various sw or inventor understand me well, the approach to the program is made extremely immediate, while so far the user has always found himself, even in wildfire environment (which should be the easy environment of proe), however to face the thousand options and potential enclosed in each command. these, for charity, are the true power of proes (in some post I read of cad of level "top"), but in terms "cree" are also an obstacle sometimes.
in the details of this prof. is kindly illuminating us.

the official position ptc in fact is more or less this: "There is nothing that allows you control, planning, design power like parametric, and we in the parametric are very strong, on multiple levels of complexity. to meet the needs of users who, however, often use the parametric as an explicit, to allow quick geometric changes without having to restructure or know complex model trees, to begin to converge the two technologies ptc, pro|engineer and cocreate, to solve the problem still open of the hybrid use of parametric and explicit technology, here, we pass everything to creo".

actually cocreate (onespace, me10...same thing), or as it is called now, I create elements/direct, will remain for at least 18-24 months still a line to itself, waiting for convergence.
for the record, it is a rather widespread product (even I imagined so much!), and likes, a lot, to those who have it! Although, it is also true, those who know how to use the parametric as such, by structuring their projects and masters of the developed products, still have some advantage. .

I hope I have cleared the ideas to those who asked for clarification!
 
El_Bluesss said:
....
create differs from st of siemens because when you pass a file through instrumentation type parametric->direct->parametric do not miss the originality parameters. ...
Click to expand...
Hello, little note,
it has been said several times that with nx you do not lose, if you want, the parameterization.
 
wired said:
Hello, little note,
it has been said several times that with nx you do not lose, if you want, the parameterization.
Click to expand...
Uh, yeah, sorry, right. Sorry, but by default (too much advertising braces your brain) when I think about st I think about solid edge st. my mistake!
 
I think I remember something like this, but concerning updates to I create in Italian for e-learning, the web portal of formation of ptc. they spoke of availability localized courses in language about 2 months after the end of June...maybe it was this. Mah.
 
El_Bluesss said:
I think I remember something like this, but concerning updates to I create in Italian for e-learning, the web portal of formation of ptc. they spoke of availability localized courses in language about 2 months after the end of June...maybe it was this. Mah.
Click to expand...
I think you're right, the news was March 3, so we should be there.
http://creo. ptc.com/2011/03/creo-1-0-just-the-apps-ma’am/better so, from good slender I am curious to see the news.
 
in modena I will also be present at the stand, so I hope to see you numerous!:smile:
just to clarify some ideas, in March was released the beta version in test to the customers who wanted it, in June will be launched the f000 and that is the first edition, while from September onwards you will start with the m010 and go.

greetings
 
personally regarding creo 1.0 beta, I was quite disappointed...
I have always worked as var for cocreate, and now I have passed (obviously) to ptc.
the potential of modeling with its explicit modeling are far from what was introduced in creo 1.0.
However, I am convinced that the union of the two technologies, if done well, is the very best way to follow.

Hopefully...
 
Tuli said:
personally regarding creo 1.0 beta, I was quite disappointed...
I have always worked as var for cocreate, and now I have passed (obviously) to ptc.
the potential of modeling with its explicit modeling are far from what was introduced in creo 1.0.
However, I am convinced that the union of the two technologies, if done well, is the very best way to follow.

Hopefully...
Click to expand...
I create parametric is not create direct, so I don't know what you should be disappointed.
if you want such functions and which to your dear old cocreate use direct non parametric.
It is as if I were disappointed by the direct functions after years of advisory on pro/e hoping that direct has parametric features comparative to the old pro/e, we try not to confuse the ideas to the users to make.

greetings
 
Okay.
then if the problem is not making confusion to other users we say things as they are:
exists creo element pro (pro-e)
exists creo element direct modeling (cocreate)
and there exists creo 1.0 (for now beta).

I don't think I've dreamed that when installing I create 1.0 you'll be asked what applications you want to install (see attachment):

parametric
♪
♪

what I meant is simply that the direct part that is installed to you with creo 1.0 beta and really limited.

Obviously I didn't expect to find all the cocreated features within creo 1.0 direct... but something more yes.

However, not to argue, but perhaps confusion in other users also comes from the fact that ptc has decided to call in the same way 3 software radically different?! :confused:

greetings
 

Attachments

  • Setup_creo.webp
    Setup_creo.webp
    12 KB · Views: 14
Parametric_Ozzy said:
In short, I miss you on my wedding trip, leave me alone, appoint my name in vain! shame! :-)
If one of those 3 had been ozzy, the 1500 features first of all would have been 500, because I am capable! ahahahaha
Second, I would have thought:
dick if I had the explicit indeed I should not have remembered which sketch rules the skeleton of the rib so I would not have lost minutes to look for it in the model tree and break @@ to redefine all the fittings that failed to cascade.. .
boys for changes like those the explicit will be like the cigarette after a beautiful trumpet... a beautiful trumpet obviously. :wink:
or for those who do not smoke, after a beautiful trumpet stay alone without the woman talking in the background... :-)
impagable! :smile:
Click to expand...
??? and what about the cigarette pair+silenzio? paradisiac:biggrin::biggrin:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 94 (members: 0, guests: 94)
Back
Top