cswp certification - step 2

[gianniturbina]

hello to all;
I recently performed the test for the second segment cswp; Although I have passed it, I have found myself in front of two questions which I have not been able to answer;
in the multibody part in the example, the question required to eliminate the internal excavation, along the whole bielletta, on the only right side.
How would you do that?
I attach the file.

 

[gianniturbina]

In essence, how to eliminate the excavation highlighted in violet (so it is clearer what it means with the question

 

[New Rider]

In essence, how to eliminate the excavation highlighted in violet (so it is clearer what it means with the question

you must go to remove the solid union flag in the ''specchiatura6' and bring it before ''svuota4''

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

could just a face delete, but I have no way to download the zip, which I hope is part 3d, to make a test

 

[gianniturbina]

Yes it is part 3d; I tried with facial elimination, but he won't let me do it.

 

[gianniturbina]

you must go to remove the solid union flag in the ''specchiatura6' and bring it before ''svuota4''

ok, however in this way it does not remain as indicated by the question, where you see that the solid remains "only" and not separated in two parts;
in fact it was asked both the inertia moment and the weight in g.
I don't think it's okay. More than anything, it's just that I don't get a match.

 

[New Rider]

you must go to remove the solid union flag in the ''specchiatura6' and bring it before ''svuota4''

ok, however in this way it does not remain as indicated by the question, where you see that the solid remains "only" and not separated in two parts;
in fact it was asked both the inertia moment and the weight in g.
I don't think it's okay. More than anything, it's just that I don't get a match.

I also did the cswp and I passed it. the answer was correct. I believe that the difference between being unique or separated in two parts serves to do these things. propitiages do not vary (mass,iners,baricentres etc.)

 

[gianniturbina]

Okay, thank you all! by the way with the sw2018 sp2 does not let me join the bodies with match, while with the sw2017 yes... I managed! Or how could you do it? apart from manually filling through extrusions various solid sectors?

 

[gianniturbina]

I also did the cswp and I passed it. the answer was correct. I believe that the difference between being unique or separated in two parts serves to do these things. propitiages do not vary (mass,iners,baricentres etc.)

Do you remember the topics for the cswp segment 3?
Thank you! ! !

 

[New Rider]

Do you remember the topics for the cswp segment 3?
Thank you! ! !

I also miss segment 3

 

[gianniturbina]

 

[Strego]

Hello, everyone. I just faced segment 2 and had the same model here described. I confirm that to empty the component only on one side must deflag the union of the results and then combine the two obtained solids.
I would like to ask how you would solve this question instead (photos).

practically the thickness of 1mm for the external profile is unaltered and internally is thickened. How would you solve it?

Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

system l'allegato

 

[Strego]

Hello, everyone. I just faced segment 2 and had the same model here described. I confirm that to empty the component only on one side must deflag the union of the results and then combine the two obtained solids.
I would like to ask how you would solve this question instead (photos).

practically the thickness of 1mm for the external profile is unaltered and internally is thickened. How would you solve it?

Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I have no way to yield how the model is made and what ropes are used to create that thickness.
hypothesized to have to intervene without touching the existing functions, then to do a posthumous correction, without knowing if the radius must remain equal (si hypotizo) you do a face erase to eliminate the rays, a face shift with offset option to thicken, finally you restore the radiation