cutting distinct, recovering prop from inactive config

[cacciatorino]

Hi.
I am putting in the table of welded frames (multibody) in which some parts are to be obtained from bone. These pantographs are "configurations" that are obtained from welded, through the suppression of features and/or bodies.

when I put on the table the welded obviously insert the separate cut on the config. "complete", however, I would like that in the same separate, the line of the component to be oxytaglio, appeared also the identification code of the pantograph (my client manages these parts in his database as separate codes). The problem is that this code is inserted into the side file as an anagram property, but it's a specific propie of the "pantographed" configuration, so I don't know how to call it back when I'm in the config. "complete."

I hope the question is clear, otherwise I will try to explain myself better.

 

[re_solidworks]

you can fill out the properties of the separate folder containing the body with the desired code property. this operation is to be managed by hand and the correctness of the idem connection.
keep in mind that it could be more practical to bring out the body (in a new part) while keeping the connection with the original body.
in my opinion even if you have to manage an extra file is easier than suspending and reactivating in the model functions and bodies.
if instead you have made a multibody with the functions of sheet metal the speech changes as it thinks swx to manage the suspension or activation of the features to keep only the body concerned.
I don't know if I explained, if it's not clear I see to be more detailed.

 

[cacciatorino]

you can fill out the properties of the separate folder containing the body with the desired code property. this operation is to be managed by hand and the correctness of the idem connection.

Now I'm doing this. I was hoping I could somehow use automatism to prevent someone from disproportionately updating.

keep in mind that it could be more practical to bring out the body (in a new part) while keeping the connection with the original body.

I'll check it out for a moment, even if my client doesn't work like that and I don't want it to cause pdm problems, but it would be good to have the crude with the supermmetals.

 

[SolidUser]

no cad has this automatism, as the assignment of the code of the crude takes place by the hand of the management or the pdm.
what suggests you king does not bring automatism, as the assignment of the code field you have to do anyway by hand.
he uses a pdm that does it and you use dbworks that does it.
exploits the potential of your pdm in conjunction with solidworks.