date csys

[avalon3d]

Good morning, everyone!
again to ask for a little help, indeed two!

I thought there was a way to put notes in the dynamic sketch odds, didn't I?

Then, I struggle to understand with nx8: I have my absolute reference datum csys, in the head of the tree of features. when I create a sketch, the specifics I want "on plane" with plane method set on "existing plane", select my orientation, create my sketch and when I close it known that he created a second csys before the feature

more: I replace the csys with the absolute one, the sketch loses the orientation: I give him the "reattach" command, I re-create another csys... :36_1_28:

Does anyone know if there is a way to disable (or incorporate) this creation?

 

[axa]

Good morning, everyone!
again to ask for a little help, indeed two!

I thought there was a way to put notes in the dynamic sketch odds, didn't I?

Then, I struggle to understand with nx8: I have my absolute reference datum csys, in the head of the tree of features. when I create a sketch, the specifics I want "on plane" with plane method set on "existing plane", select my orientation, create my sketch and when I close it known that he created a second csys before the feature

more: I replace the csys with the absolute one, the sketch loses the orientation: I give him the "reattach" command, I re-create another csys... :36_1_28:

Does anyone know if there is a way to disable (or incorporate) this creation?

file-utilities-customer-defaults-sketch-general-session settings
remove the flag from
create intermediate datum csys through create sketch dialogue.

even if I think it is more convenient to create the intermediate csys.

I didn't understand the question about quotas.

 

[avalon3d]

Great axa, thank you very much!

I thought there was a chance to put memos in the sketch, if I'm not mistaken in parentheses after the value:

eg. p15=8.25 (h), or something like that.. .

I also take advantage of it for another question: in modeling I see in "transparency" the previous condition of the solid, for example I see smiley faces with direct modelling.
How do you delete this option?

However it may be convenient in some cases, but I prefer to create the reference plan when I need it rather than having an 850 feature tree!

 

[ceschi1959]

Great axa, thank you very much!

I thought there was a chance to put memos in the sketch, if I'm not mistaken in parentheses after the value:

eg. p15=8.25 (h), or something like that.. .

I also take advantage of it for another question: in modeling I see in "transparency" the previous condition of the solid, for example I see smiley faces with direct modelling.
How do you delete this option?

However it may be convenient in some cases, but I prefer to create the reference plan when I need it rather than having an 850 feature tree!

for the first one is written: p6=25/ comment

for the second view image

for the third good Christmas!!!:smile:

 

[axa]

However it may be convenient in some cases, but I prefer to create the reference plan when I need it rather than having an 850 feature tree!

Do you know that datums and sketches can be incorporated into their parent feature?

 

[avalon3d]

for the first one is written: p6=25/ comment

for the second view image

for the third good Christmas!!!:smile:

There she is... perfect!
Thank you very much, a great basket! :finger:

Good Christmas to you too!

 

[avalon3d]

Do you know that datums and sketches can be incorporated into their parent feature?

thanks axa, I know that you can incorporate some features between them, but personally I prefer to keep them peeled to give "a logical thread" to the tree.. .
old hard habits to die you know...

 

[The_Matrix]

thanks axa, I know that you can incorporate some features between them, but personally I prefer to keep them peeled to give "a logical thread" to the tree.. .
old hard habits to die you know...

usati i feature group!as soon as you get them you will not be able to do without them.
I am now "feature group dependent".
no layer

 

[matfio]

usati i feature group!as soon as you get them you will not be able to do without them.
I am now "feature group dependent".
no layer

If you make me some examples of use it would please, I tried but I can't, maybe bad habits, type of work....I don't know, if you help me understand more I would be happy ....... since at the doors is native.......:smile:

 

[axa]

If you make me some examples of use it would please, I tried but I can't, maybe bad habits, type of work....I don't know, if you help me understand more I would be happy ....... since at the doors is native.......:smile:

I think that, with regard to the discussion, matrix can refer to the fact that the new groups are of help to organize the features more cleverly than before (old groups), in the sense that seeing them as folders you can manage more easily.
for gifts tell me when I have to pass
Bye.

I'm swype's caxxo puts all the capitals on me, now I have to study it: )

 

[The_Matrix]

I think that, with regard to the discussion, matrix can refer to the fact that the new groups are of help to organize the features more cleverly than before (old groups), in the sense that seeing them as folders you can manage more easily.
for gifts tell me when I have to pass
Bye.

I'm swype's caxxo puts all the capitals on me, now I have to study it: )

That's right.
I haven't been using + layers and other fines, but only groups, which I switch on/off etc.
I find them a highly efficient and understandable method of work.
waiting for the "part module".

 

[IB-Motorsport]

I could also use the features groups.... One day...

:bekle:but I’m a fan of the layers!!! and you’ll get stuck in the next versions I’ll rip your arms off!!! ! : : Jigggrin:
Conservative to the bone!!! !

 

[IPdesign]

I could also use the features groups.... One day...

:bekle:but I am a fan of the layers!!! and you get angry to take them off in the next versions I'll rip your arms off!:biggrin:

Conservative to the bone!!!!

I'm also the old guard and I think it exactly like you.
Cuff layer :tongue:

 

[The_Matrix]

You don't understand a fava. :tongue:
I would like you to try to work on a pattern made with layers from another... ah ah ah

Don't worry, girl, you know nothing's going to be destroyed in the nook, do you? including mating conditions. :wink:

 

[ceschi1959]

Don't worry, girl, you know nothing's going to be destroyed in the nook, do you? including mating conditions. :wink:

What??? When do I return? mating conditions 2 revenge!

 

[The_Matrix]

What??? When do I return? mating conditions 2 revenge!

They're not coming back. .
They're not being removed. even if you don't see them. :wink:

 

[avalon3d]

They're not coming back. .
They're not being removed. even if you don't see them. :wink:

but how come all these upheavals?
True, new functions have been implemented, some of which are really useful in work, other upheavals instead take me longer to trace to what I did.
is it about trying to make the program more user friendly for a new user or what is the reason?

 

[IB-Motorsport]

You don't understand a fava.
I would like you to try to work on a pattern made with layers from another... ah ah ah

Don't worry, girl, you know nothing's going to be destroyed in the nook, do you? including mating conditions. :wink:

You're right... on this I have to acknowledge... I was used well because in gm there were strict rules:mixed: on the use of layers ... controlled by a final check-mate!

in other companies where I was each using layers and categories that invented at the moment ... result a marasma ...

in a technical office with many people and many projects it takes a standardization of them set and respected by everyone!

 

[The_Matrix]

but how come all these upheavals?
True, new functions have been implemented, some of which are really useful in work, other upheavals instead take me longer to trace to what I did.
is it about trying to make the program more user friendly for a new user or what is the reason?

I meant that even if a function is "retired" the nx code is not removed... access to these functions is hidden.
There's always a "magic" variable that, if you want, makes them reappear...

definitely we are working to make ennecs + simple and accessible to all... not easy.
What are these things that have so upset you? :tongue:

 

[The_Matrix]

You're right... on this I have to acknowledge... I was used well because in gm there were strict rules:mixed: on the use of layers ... controlled by a final check-mate!

in other companies where I was each using layers and categories that invented at the moment ... result a marasma ...

in a technical office with many people and many projects it takes a standardization of them set and respected by everyone!

I know.
and 100% shared what you say about standardization and its control.
but do you know that in Italy only 3 companies use check mate to control the quality of what is produced in ut? Amazing. . .

Anyway, take a tour of the feature groups... You'll see they're so comfortable that you can't help it, and you'll forget the layers... categories and menate various... :finger: