• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

deletion of the couple to the cancellation of a part

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atreiou
  • Start date Start date

Atreiou

Guest
question, is it possible to make sure that in a joint when I delete a part or subaxieme, that the couplings are deleted and not suspended? I have to do it by hand otherwise in some cases they still seem to have effect even if suspended.
 
I don't find where to pounce, the pup-up chede me only if you delete the whole subaxieme or only the selected part
 
when you click on one of the two options you should appear a second pop up where you can poke
 
ok, if I delete a part directly in its main set appears a different pop-up with the choice to delete the child functions or absorbed them, etc.
If I run out of a top-level group instead of not.
 
but do you delete the parts in the subarms working in the main axieme?
If you do it by changing subaxes?
 
Sometimes it happens
to reread what this phrase means?
sometimes does it happen to erase a part of a subaxieme directly from the upper-level axieme without entering into subaxieme modification?
sometimes does it happen to erase a part of a subaxieme directly from the upper-level axieme by entering into subaxieme modification?
Does it happen to erase a part of a subaxieme?

I did some tests with a multi-tier set and also deleting a part in the 3/4° level, without getting into sub-assiem modification, the part is erased and the window that asks for confirmation to delete all the dependent couplings.
look in the options that have not been inhibited the warning message otherwise it explains well what you do and what happens because we started to delete a part in a set and we arrived to clear a part of sub-axis. . I wouldn't have forgotten something else.
 
I hook up to the discussion x ask you this... what sense does it give the possibility to leave the suspended couple when removing a component from the axieme? I did not understand the utility of this option that from sw and that seems to me, but maybe I remember badly, that before
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top