demolish component

[Reg_Rev]

Bye to all,

I have to demolish a part of object built by local component "magical model" or "wall model" or as a family, the problem lies in the fact that once built the qusto object cannot be divided into two or more parts to please and then decide to demolish those desired. I noticed however that the command size works well when I have to for example dissect a standard beam or drawn by family beams as profile extrusion. I can't understand the difference because in one case it works and in the other you can't do it.

Another drawback is to demolish a part of a wall with an irregular profile, I cannot associate "modification profile" to a work phase or demolition.

thank you for your help!! !

 

[gfrank]

you have to build the generic objects "mirror" (even with irregular profile) so that they are already "divided" for the subsequent demolition, in practice build a wall with two or more parts of wall (accostate) and then demolish one or more parts

 

[Reg_Rev]

Thank you.

I believe that it is important as a problem, this requires prior planning to the realization of a state of fact is not a matter of little account,

I don't understand how a beam can be divided and a generic model can be.

We hope we can solve this. . .

 

[Tristan]

We hope we can solve this. . .

If I understand the problem well, it will be resolved in 2012 with "parts"

 

[Reg_Rev]

OK we wait

while we experience, if you have information about it, maybe using a family
especially as "trave" to create objects to be dissected with the command cut let us know. . .

 

[Reg_Rev]

with regard to the demolition of an opening in the wall, in a standard wall, in a floor or in a roof you could use the creation of a local component and use the opening command that allows to create a generic profile opening in the case of a standard wall while in the case of an irregular roof e.g. from extrusion etc. you should use subtraction of a vacuum in entrmbi cases the opening or subtraction of the vacuum to the project phase.

In other cases of generic objects or other objects it is necessary to use the prior design in the design of the state of fact by drawing individually the parts that will then have to be demolished e.g. in a scale of which later a part will have to be demolished.