design and develop sheet tub

[Antares89]

Also in my work it is necessary to create stilts and tanks and I developed another method, but I think it is more Moroccan than that of tarkus.

in my method design in part a solid with the internal volume of the tub through a crossroads of the two views of the tub (one that generates the first solid and the other that cuts it). save this file as a skeleton.
At this point I create another normal part, comes the solid first as a surface, I create a sketch on every face I want to have in a single sheet of sheet. Now I convert the sheet file and use the face command on each sketch. inventor will automatically add the necessary fittings and create the correct development.
the problem of this method is that in the end you find yourself with a design part for each sheet you use and they van assembled in a set. the procedure is not long since being created on a derivative has in common the same origin and you can bind them to each other on the plans of origin.
another problem is that the blades generated van welded edge edge and therefore is an external development compared to the volume used. if you want to make an internal development van considered the thicknesses in creating the reference solid.

I hope I have been clear in the explanation of the procedure.

 

[nikkke]

The problem is that I was looking for a system similar to what I've been using for years but trying to scrape old programs. . .
the fact is that I have 1 cad 3d of 98 on an old repentum 2 with windows 95 I still retain as to model sheet from what I saw to inventor from 10 to 0...

I am accustomed since I started drawing in 3d that the models for the sheet are made to zero thickness.. and only 1 time converted into sheet metal gives it the direction of thickness x each single face.. without worrying what length draw a flange if it goes inside or outside.. It's not worth it. .
so you do on topsolid x example. . .

I was very ill when I tried inventor and solidworks and I saw that you can't do this. .
seems that x-built controls have been removed from all programs.. in their place sketch 2d and for each cable you have to build the plan x 3points where to draw the sketch 2d..
besides designing the solid interior?? But I don't even think about it... I'm looking elsewhere. .

take a parallelepipedo and model it with the boolean until it becomes the figure I need to try to do it only if it can not do otherwise, I prefer to add 1 surface at a time so I see the actual form of the object from immediately. .
However tastes are tastes. .

 

[Tarkus]

Thank you

Uninstalled inventor!!!! I don't like x anything.. I look for other solutions more suitable for sheet metal parts. .
Anyway, he really disappointed me. .
x I can close the discussion

Thanks again!!!

and that I must say, I read your posts (up to 22) and I think you do well to uninstall it if you just need to make the developments you need, since it is obvious that you do not need precise developments.
in fact you talk about making developments to thickness 0 and giving the thickness after.
for precise development the dimensions change depending on the thickness, that is why there is difference between my development (the precise one) and your (the approximate one).
anyway so much to say the last, it is not true that you have to draw by force the internal volume, you can do it also with the outside,
change the separation fittings or simply, as I did in the sketch (see my models), give the odds as : external dimension - thickness.
but maybe we'll talk about it when you need precise development.
remains a good discussion for the forum.:finger:

 

[nikkke]

that needs approximate developments I never said! !
On the contrary, I need precise developments, such as that done by me, even if quickly, to tell the truth, I do not find any difference with your development. do you find any x case given that your development is accurate and mine is approximate?? ? ? ?
Do you know what changes "1 mm incline" (not in length) on a 1200 mm long tub??? ? nothing always that is right that you have seen those three bangs on the junctions with 70 flanges.. operation made evidently because if no inventor did not open the tub.. And I'd stop here. This already makes me discard the precise adjective x 1 such development. . Those short cuts, they are then soldered and in a workshop they make you correct them. .
Anyway: when I make 1 x development something and that something is bent always goes well to the first hit.. except distraction errors, this would not be possible with "approximate" developments
I know well what the sheet metal retreats are.. I'm ten years old and I've been developing x lamiere and I can judge the programs. said this is not 1 polemic towards you and I renew thanks x helped me, it was only 1 clarify things, hello

 

[Tarkus]

only to specify, without any animosity, we would miss:

that needs approximate developments I never said! !
On the contrary, I need precise developments, such as that done by me, even if quickly, to tell the truth, I do not find any difference with your development. do you find any x case given that your development is accurate and mine is approximate?? ? ? ?

You told me in post 18 that yours was different from mine!

you know what changes "1 mm inclination"

note

(not long) on a 1200 mm long tub???? ? nothing always that is right that you have seen those three bangs on the junctions with 70 flanges.. operation made evidently because if no inventor did not open the tub.. And I'd stop here. This already makes me discard the precise adjective x 1 such development. . Those short cuts, they are then soldered and in a workshop they make you correct them. .

the decrease in flunge measurement is a parameter that inventor still applies (as I think many solid modelers) and is called "game".
Those "cuts" are called in inventor "empty corner" and are also necessary.
Keep in mind that these work I've done is done automatically by inventor as necessary for proper development.

Anyway: when I make 1 x development something and that something is bent always goes well to the first hit.. except distraction errors, this would not be possible with "approximate" developments
I know well what the sheet metal retreats are.. I'm ten years old and I've been developing x lamiere and I can judge the programs. said this is not 1 polemic towards you and I renew thanks x helped me, it was only 1 clarify things, hello

Good holidays to all and good work to those who don't.