design design

[Anna14]

Hello, guys, I'm a first year aerospace engineering student and I'd need a hand to figure out how the pieces of this together are called and how could I perform assembly?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

They are called trees, bearings, flanges, gears....the name only serves to give it a general indication.
for assembly draw them one by one and then put them one by the other according to the drawing.

 

[Anna14]

Yes. I have already done the design. but in the exercise it is written to assign to all elements of the axieme an increasing number in order to define a correct sequence of assembly

 

[meccanicamg]

This reducer is years that talk about it all, as well as us.
Propose a mounting sequence and let's talk about it if you've been able to give some sensible names to the elements.
I'd say if you have this engineering problem, you didn't do the mechanical expert.... are you sure you want to become an engineer?

 

[meccanicamg]

to be an engineer, you must be an engineer. Surely a reducer sell it....so a catalog to see something there is.... then you have to understand who goes before and who goes after and how to mount.
inspired by explosions or thissomething will be preassembled and then assembled to the rest.

 

[volaff]

to be an engineer, you must be an engineer. Surely a reducer sell it....so a catalog to see something there is.... then you have to understand who goes before and who goes after and how to mount.
inspired by explosions View attachment 51954or thisView attachment 51955something will be preassembled and then assembled to the rest.

Hi, you can tell me where you got the above explosives.
Thank you.

sent by my sm-a750fn using tapatalk

 

[welcome to the machine]

that below is a classic angle gear but I think the American house that produced them no longer exists. on their paper catalog there was the explosive and there were even glosses in a4, (other than download 3d.... )
I'm not sure there's the explosive.

 

[ramjet]

I ask who is more experienced than I am: does the drawing from anna seem correct?
I am referring to having ball bearings on shafts with conical wheels, as if there were no axial thrusts.
It is true that we do not know the entity of the couple (and therefore of the axial force) but I would never venture to put ball bearings instead of tapering rollers.

I don't know about you.
I have opinions.
Thank you.

 

[meccanicamg]

I ask who is more experienced than I am: does the drawing from anna seem correct?
I am referring to having ball bearings on shafts with conical wheels, as if there were no axial thrusts.
It is true that we do not know the entity of the couple (and therefore of the axial force) but I would never venture to put ball bearings instead of tapering rollers.

I don't know about you.
I have opinions.
Thank you.

I would not even mount ball bearings, but they can bear in a combined way even the axial load. We don't know the couple to pass on.