differences between st and st2, and which of the two take.

[Er Presidente]

You're right, even if st is still very immature and hard to use when the game gets tough, to hear who's really working on it.
In fact, solidedge-st was rejected more for the new user interface than for the st itself.



I don't understand that. already st allows to bind imported solids, but maybe you mean more, like to recognize that a certain face gets by cutting revolution and make sure that the cad snaps me and automatically binds that cut?

recognize the "works" from tool and bind them automatically.
type of fittings, bevels (easy), holes, axes (medium), symmetries, parallels, coincidences, forms, (a little less easy), pattern, folds, sheet metal processing (to be worked on).

make sure that an imported "stupid" can be worked "stuiously" with the st and then, to pleasure, automatically bound.

The future is this, I have the doubt that parasolid is the right horse, but I cannot express myself on this, I want the right skills.

 

[cacciatorino]

recognize the "works" from tool and bind them automatically.
type of fittings, bevels (easy), holes, axes (medium), symmetries, parallels, coincidences, forms, (a little less easy), pattern, folds, sheet metal processing (to be worked on).

These functions already exist on most parameters: in solid edge the function is called afr =automatic feature recognizer.
useless to say that they only work on simple solids, typically those made for machining to the tool machine.

I find it much more frustrating, at least because of my activity I cannot have:
1) possibility to transmit metadata between different cads (codes descriptions etc)
2) transfer the bonds between different countries
3) model-table association by transferring a project between different cad

1 and 2 would be very trivial to obtain with a revision of the specific step, but it would go against the software house business that span on closed formats, so I think we will never see it.
3 I think it would be more complicated.

The fact that an imported solid no longer has the features has never bothered me so much, apart from losing the threads.

ps.: the jt format promises to make 1 and 2 (on 2 I'm not very sure, let's see if the_matrix lights us up), but check out the other software houses make an effort to implement jt support on their cad.

 

[Tequila]

you, who debate you by denying the truth, you, who act against morality and justice, you, who deny the truth and act in the shadow of falsehood and falsehood, you, do not seek the justification for your petty acts!

the verb, the truth is there under your eyes and you continue to consider your turpiloquious lame as worthy of the intellect!

out of your shell, from darkness and look to the light, the future will be radiant and eber of happiness!

p.s.: sick, cured!! ! !
:biggrin:

Yes! as says Leso, it's so bad to work on Saturday:

 

[Tequila]

Once you implement the st in a "transparent" way and integrated into it and together with the "features & history based", you will have the most powerful work tool you can imagine.

definitely in a future (it hopes very near) this technology and also other of new implemented will allow us to work very quickly, powerful and those who more have it put, fact that as already said at the first exit of the st was for the in fact a technology still young and immature, not complete and not reversible and not integrable in all office environments and that is why it aroused controversy (beside the new system of 2007). it had already been said that it would take 3-4 releases to see its actual potential and will be so.already with the st2 they have implemented the sheets and improved stability, with the 3 in addition to the customizations of the menus there will also be other news (including that of the hallway voice that will simplify the environments), so surely from the 3 on there will be a lot more people who will begin to use more massively this new way of modeling.

only one dowel is missing:
the "post modelling featuring" (invented "on site"). can insert features (such as constraints) even after modeling (or imported) the piece.

there are already, not just at the level that you just look at the model on the monitor and impart voice or mental commands that updates and changes in real time, but there are

 

[Er Presidente]

there are already, not just at the level that you just look at the model on the monitor and impart voice or mental commands that updates and changes in real time, but there are

I meant something like the one that makes spaceclaim, you put the cursor on the model and, according to the context, the program issues the constraints, the flight or already defined.

sc has traced the groove, it is up to others to carp its potential and implement its philosophies.

 

[Tequila]

I meant something like the one that makes spaceclaim, you put the cursor on the model and, according to the context, the program issues the constraints, the flight or already defined.

sc has traced the groove, it is up to others to carp its potential and implement its philosophies.

Unfortunately I don't know sc, I'm watching some videos posted and also on youtube but I can't find anything that suits you. If by chance you know there's some specific video on this post that I'm curious.
Hi.

 

[max2]

I would like to know the main differences between the two versions of the program.. .

and some I should take...I mainly use it for the drawing of sheets.

Thank you very much.

Matteo

I think it is not satisfactory. For example, when working in synchronous, it did not thread on external diameters. and lacked other things, always in synchronous.
st2 allows to work in synchronous quite well.

of course both st and st2 are fine if you do not use synchronous.