• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

differences in sw versions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ipotemusa
  • Start date Start date

ipotemusa

Guest
Excuse me if I "intruff" but I will have to make a small relationship to a "almost customer", to convince him to update his version of solidworks 2007.
I ask you kindly if there is any link or other where you can find the improvements between the various versions, so as to "convince" it to update.
I know ke has 2008 in the drawer, but I would like to understand if big steps have been made on the next vers.
I'm interested in this because I'm a solid edge, and if everything's okay, I'll have to "unhook" in his technical office; I would therefore have an updated and working sw, as I will have to learn it myself, quickly and almost in secret.
Is there also any user who has passed from solid edge to solid works that can give me 2/3 straight? :mixed:
greetings
silvio
 
Excuse me if I "intruff" but I will have to make a small relationship to a "almost customer", to convince him to update his version of solidworks 2007.
I ask you kindly if there is any link or other where you can find the improvements between the various versions, so as to "convince" it to update.
I know ke has 2008 in the drawer, but I would like to understand if big steps have been made on the next vers.
I'm interested in this because I'm a solid edge, and if everything's okay, I'll have to "unhook" in his technical office; I would therefore have an updated and working sw, as I will have to learn it myself, quickly and almost in secret.
Is there also any user who has passed from solid edge to solid works that can give me 2/3 straight? :mixed:
greetings
silvio
Take a look qui
 
Bye to all,
I would not recommend 2008 to anyone because I consider it one of the worst releases: slow and slender.

I passed to 2009 (sp2) after reading some recommended articles on this forum and I am fully satisfied.
the tables are smooth and quite functional.

I participated in the presentation of 2010 but I am not fully convinced.

I hope I could have been helpful.

dancer
 
Is there also any user who has passed from solid edge to solid works that can give me 2/3 straight? :mixed:
greetings
silvio
http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/search.php?searchid=1070564with this research you find the discussions that I started, to make me advise on things that I can do with if and that I found difficult or impossible with swx. Many problems I reported were resolved by the forum colleagues, in the various discussions everything is indicated.
 
I started from 2007 and now I'm using 2010, passing through all versions. between 2007 and 2008 there is a world...
Since 2008 they have been improving on many details and on the stability of the sw.
for now the best version I used is definitely 2009 sp5. both for stability and for functions. in 2010 they introduced some useful things but other questionable. there is to consider that I work with the basic module of solidworks, so I do not use routing, surfaces but only sheets and welded.
greetings
Michael
 
I also find that 2008 was one of the worst. 2007, as stability, one of the best. 2009 sp 5.1 is fine. I haven't tried it yet, but I find there are some very interesting functions.
 
my sad experience was as follows: 2007 xp32 card ati a weeping, 2008 xp32 and view64 picture card a despair, 2009 vista64 picture card up to the irritating sp4, 2009 vista64 after sp4 usable, 2010 I don't know but until the sp5 I don't put it.
According to the dealer, instability problems were due to the configuration of the workstation and the network environment. now we have reduced to have the clean workstation with only installed swx and a virtual machine with vmware with inside all other programs.... it is not the maximum comfort with a monitor only but it works.
 
I started from 2007 and now I'm using 2010, passing through all versions. between 2007 and 2008 there is a world...
Since 2008 they have been improving on many details and on the stability of the sw.
for now the best version I used is definitely 2009 sp5. both for stability and for functions. in 2010 they introduced some useful things but other questionable. there is to consider that I work with the basic module of solidworks, so I do not use routing, surfaces but solo lamiere e was buried.
salute
michele
Okkio to multibody plates. . .

I opened a service pack request...
 
sometimes there are tribulations based reasons. a single driver of a device that has nothing to do with swx can put in crisis the stability of a workstation.
 
sometimes there are tribulations based reasons. a single driver of a device that has nothing to do with swx can put in crisis the stability of a workstation.
!
in our office we have 7400 ws with 3700 painting.
an uncertified driver created artifacts in a car
with welding functions.
installed the confirmed drivers, the problem is missing.
However, 2010 is, in my opinion, the best release made until now.
sin that multibody plates have some youth problem
(here I give responsibility to betatesters for not having noticed a bug
giant) has many tools of rapid implementation, the muose
becomes interactive in the quick selection of preset functions.
the notes in the quotations of the tables can be fried of a pane
which stores the latest notes/tolerances/formats added to
table quotations.
Moreover, sheet functions are much more reliable and often solve
very complex carter developments without those annoying messages
to impose a flange.
now, after only 15 days of use, I would not be able to return to versions
Previously... who remembers that in the first versions was not even
possible to have more than one (one) body per file? than times.. .
 
!
in our office we have 7400 ws with 3700 painting.
an uncertified driver created artifacts in a car
with welding functions.
installed the confirmed drivers, the problem is missing.
However, 2010 is, in my opinion, the best release made until now.
sin that multibody plates have some youth problem
(here I give responsibility to betatesters for not having noticed a bug
giant) has many tools of rapid implementation, the muose
becomes interactive in the quick selection of preset functions.
the notes in the quotations of the tables can be fried of a pane
which stores the latest notes/tolerances/formats added to
table quotations.
Moreover, sheet functions are much more reliable and often solve
very complex carter developments without those annoying messages
to impose a flange.
now, after only 15 days of use, I would not be able to return to versions
Previously... who remembers that in the first versions was not even
possible to have more than one (one) body per file? than times.. .
I don't know what to do, in 2010 there are some functions that would solve me many problems like the mirror well done together and the explosion of the separate elements, but I don't trust.
apart from multibody sheets that I don't care about (I think solidworks continues to carry out a non-optimal system with these multibody and I use them little and only in certain porductive circumstances)
is it really stable? how is the comparison of stability between 2009 and 2010? Do you work decently? how long do you use it?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top