distinct base and assembly

[Musical76]

Hi.
are a user of nx4
I have to manage n versions of a product including n components.

I created a master model drafting of this together by setting
on the model a set reference that excludes me from displaying some components.

At this point I'd like the separate base to list me
only the visible components.

How can I do that? ?

I thank you since now for the kind answers.

 

[Utente NX]

You have to use the arrangements.

 

[The_Matrix]

You have to use the arrangements.

Wow!
I am really pleased that a user knows about arrangements and respond so strongly!
:finger:

 

[Musical76]

Hi.

I tried with arangment, but it doesn't allow me to hide the details. ..what instead allow me reference set...
I also tried to move the objects on different layers, but in any case the list of the part list remains inclusive of "hidden" objects.
Basically what I'm doing is a configurator. ..I would like to get a distinct list of components in a drafting and a list of components for a different configuration on another drafting, but I would like them to refer to the same model. .
for vs experience is something that exists and can you do and manage? ?

Thank you.

greetings

 

[Utente NX]

Hi.

I tried with arangment, but it doesn't allow me to hide the details. ..what instead allow me reference set...
I also tried to move the objects on different layers, but in any case the list of the part list remains inclusive of "hidden" objects.
Basically what I'm doing is a configurator. ..I would like to get a distinct list of components in a drafting and a list of components for a different configuration on another drafting, but I would like them to refer to the same model. .
for vs experience is something that exists and can you do and manage? ?

Thank you.

greetings

the 'arrangement' uses the suspension of the component, so it disappears both graphically and from ram memory.
see the 'arrangement' to simulate variants of your set or different positions of some axioms/components.

 

[Musical76]

Perfect!! I saw it working!! Thank you.
I can create arrangement with various product configurations by suppressing components. in this way the distinct design of the overall is updated.

But one thing is not very clear to me.
the repositioning of the components, at this moment I can only do it with the "reposition" I can not make the arrangement work with the material condition.. .
or: we consider having a pneumatic cylinder of 100mm stroke.
I must be able to make tables where this cylinder is displayed with race 100, 50, and 0 on 3 different boards.
Is there a different beard? ?
Do I create a skeleton?? and act on that? ?

 

[Utente NX]

Perfect!! I saw it working!! Thank you.
I can create arrangement with various product configurations by suppressing components. in this way the distinct design of the overall is updated.

But one thing is not very clear to me.
the repositioning of the components, at this moment I can only do it with the "reposition" I can not make the arrangement work with the material condition.. .
or: we consider having a pneumatic cylinder of 100mm stroke.
I must be able to make tables where this cylinder is displayed with race 100, 50, and 0 on 3 different boards.
Is there a different beard? ?
Do I create a skeleton?? and act on that? ?

in this case you will use a distance coupling, which with the right mouse button you will say 'arrangement spcific' and various value.
so for the rest.
proof...it is easier to make than to describe step by step.

 

[Musical76]

Thank you for your kind answers.

I'm trying to print the job.

Thank you.

Hi.