• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

divide a solid into two sections

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spit19
  • Start date Start date

Spit19

Guest
I appeal to you because after several attempts with "search" option I found nothing... .
I'll explain.
arrived to draw my object, now I should divide it into two sections.. .
the problem is that I tried with the cutting plan then went to draw king with the respective command but no n get nothing... .
in autocad there is the specific command draw, after you have designed a passing surface where you want the cut, select the latter and the solid is divided.. .
how can I get this solution?? ? ? ?
Greetings... .
 
If I understand correctly, you want to divide a solid into two parts, so that these are autonomous solids.
I do so: I cover the solid in question and, with the "Bolean difference", I subtract from the two solids the opposite parts regarding the section line in order to obtain the two complementary parts divided.
 
I appeal to you because after several attempts with "search" option I found nothing... .
I'll explain.
arrived to draw my object, now I should divide it into two sections.. .
the problem is that I tried with the cutting plan then went to draw king with the respective command but no n get nothing... .
in autocad there is the specific command draw, after you have designed a passing surface where you want the cut, select the latter and the solid is divided.. .
how can I get this solution?? ? ? ?
Greetings... .
the command you are looking for is _booleansplit .

you will find it under the solid menu, under the boolean split (if you have the English version) or Boolean division (if you have the Italian version).

Anyway, it's the last option on the list. :biggrin:
 
the command you are looking for is _booleansplit .

you will find it under the solid menu, under the boolean split (if you have the English version) or Boolean division (if you have the Italian version).

Anyway, it's the last option on the list. :biggrin:
Thank you so much I try and let you know if everything went well!!!:wink:
 
Thanks mariuss.
I had tried that command on a relatively complex solid, long ago, with the result of obtaining an invalid polysurface, so I had solved with the described method that I instinctively stored, completely removing that command from the mind.
So I tried again: on a relatively simple solid worked egregiously; on a more complex one the section plan doubled and each one of the two remained attached to one of the parts that I had to explode in order to erase it.
there was no way to separate the section surface from the top and therefore the result is an open polysurface. I had to rebuild the section surface.
I always get an unsuccessful polysurface... .
will I find the right method? !
 
Thanks mariuss.
I had tried that command on a relatively complex solid, long ago, with the result of obtaining an invalid polysurface, so I had solved with the described method that I instinctively stored, completely removing that command from the mind.
So I tried again: on a relatively simple solid worked egregiously; on a more complex one the section plan doubled and each one of the two remained attached to one of the parts that I had to explode in order to erase it.
there was no way to separate the section surface from the top and therefore the result is an open polysurface. I had to rebuild the section surface.
I always get an unsuccessful polysurface... .
will I find the right method? !
bhe! solids in rhino 4 are not the most...:rolleyes:
net improvements in the rhino 5 version, but still in the wip phase.
 
sometimes for operations of this type you can use the command cutafilo (or _wirecut), I find it convenient
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top