division bodies

[MassiVonWeizen]

When I did the various extrusions I always selected as a plan to draw the sketch one of the already existing bodies surfaces....so in this case the nn bodies are solidarity between them?

No. Moreover if you could remove the check today, praise can also do to the creation of the function.

 

[SimoneF]

and how can I make them supportive? I have seen that there is the welding environment where I can select the welding cord and apply it to the common contours to two different bodies... is the right path?

 

[Mike1967]

and how can I make them supportive? I have seen that there is the welding environment where I can select the welding cord and apply it to the common contours to two different bodies... is the right path?

I highly recommend that you perform the tutorials in solidworks.
I've already explained how to make the various bodies solid, let the welds you're talking about, do nothing.
search also on youtube, I for example have a small channel.https://www.youtube.com/channel/ucdf2pud4yvhysysozlkteoqalso the program guide can be useful.

ps: in my opinion the term "solidal" is improper, simply if you want to represent an object whose pieces are in contact must only be "coincidents" by starting/reaching the extrusions directly on the body, as you have already done.

 

[marcof]

mike1967 I when I did the various extrusions I have always selected as a plan to draw the sketch one of the surfaces of the already existing bodies....so in this case the nn bodies are solidarity between them?

From the point of view of the cad si model, the solids of the part are solidarity with each other, in the sense that their relative positions do not change, regardless of whether the new extrusion is or not physically attached to the rest of the model.

 

[SimoneF]

I would like to make an example to clear my ideas (almost confused) hypothesize to have the following body:after they select the upper face as sketch plane:extruded without uniting the bodies:thus obtaining the following model:in this case the base of the second parallelepiped is coincident with the lateral surface of the first (from which I extruded it)?
If I applied a pressure on the lateral surface of the second and fixed the first two bodies would remain attached with the appropriate deformations?

 

[marcof]

From the point of view of the cad si model, the solids of the part are solidarity with each other, in the sense that their relative positions do not change, regardless of whether the new extrusion is or not physically attached to the rest of the model.

I add to the written above that I am doubtful that you are making confusion between assemblies and parts.. .

 

[Mike1967]

I would like to make an example to clear my ideas (almost confused) hypothesize to have the following body:View attachment 37829after they select the upper face as sketch plane:View attachment 37830extruded without uniting the bodies:View attachment 37831thus obtaining the following model:View attachment 37832in this case the base of the second parallelepiped is coincident with the lateral surface of the first (from which I extruded it)?
If I applied a pressure on the lateral surface of the second and fixed the first two bodies would remain attached with the appropriate deformations?

1-si
2-si

.........

 

[SimoneF]

Okay then it looks like that's how things work. . .
Would it work even if (as in my case) not removing the check initially I would have provided to remove it later?

 

[Mike1967]

Okay then it looks like that's how things work. . .
Would it work even if (as in my case) not removing the check initially I would have provided to remove it later?

Yes, and I add, even in the presence of adverse weather conditions, volcanic eruptions, magnetic storms and...
:smile:

 

[SimoneF]

:biggrin: ok.... now is much clearer.... if you have any other doubts we will consult again (and I am sure I will have other doubts)....
Thank you very much to all and soon.