• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

document management

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtemp
  • Start date Start date

gtemp

Guest
I put this discussion here, tell me if I have to move it.

all of us have created, or we have let it create itself, a folder system on the server, or on the pc where to hold the relatic documents to the contract that we are performing.
Now I was reading a book, the author recommends to adopt the subdivision by subject, assigning to each folder a number followed by the topic name.
es 01_projects
02_work
and under folders are so divided
01_projects
1_xx_denomination_committee
1-xxx-0_gest_comm

and so to follow.
the author says it is a numbering model used in the Anglo-Saxon world.
any of you use this method?
Thank you.
 
Hi.
already and the files contained in the folders how it is recommended to detect them?
or can we get rid of it?

In the second case we would no longer be consistent with the nomenclature philosophy used for folders.

thanks for the answer
 
Hi.
Sorry to write about this post after almost 5 months.
documents follow the folder nomenclature.
I'm trying to get in touch with the author of the text to ask for lumens.
meanwhile I invite everyone to report their storage method.
Thank you.
 
our method is a software that allows to record all the data of the contract, including the documents, any type it is and deciding whether to register it within the database or register the link to manage it externally, however internal or external that we always manage the revisions and versions for each individual component, the result is that you no longer lose anything and you manage the big data of the orders with components, assemblies and multiaxis processing
ah already we are software developers plm for manufacturing as well as micromechanical manufacturers specialized in products for dynamic modeling............. .
 
I personally abhor the nomenclatures "parlanti".
with current technology are useless, indeed, harmful.. .
I think everything has to be in a "big" and with research you extract what you want.
absolutely alphanumeric/sequential nomenclature.
attributes that allow the most advanced and imaginative research.
If the attributes are many and you want to have a "hierarchical" organization you can use a classification tool.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top